Obama/Soros/UN/Deep State/Globalism/Shadow Government/Elites

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
Catch all for news and events specifically related to the "deep state", aka Globalism's shadow government.

Barack Obama meets with Warren Buffett in Omaha

Barack Obama [/a] stopped off in Omaha , Nebraska , Sunday to meet with billionaire investor Warren Buffett , the Omaha World-Herald reports.

Obama had lunch with Warren and Susie Buffett, an unannounced visit that involved no press corps. There's no official word on what the former president discussed with the Buffetts.

"I'm not going to talk about the meeting," Susie Buffett told the Omaha World-Herald. "The three of us ate lunch."


Obama meeting with one of the worst Robber Barons of modern history off the records? The same Robber Baron that pretty openly was the ghost writer of much of Obama's financial/banking reforms?

It is well known Obama is working with the Deep State to try to undermine Trump, but that just scratches the surface.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
Troma’s Lloyd Kaufman: “Most People In Mainstream Cinema Are Scum”

Some snippets.

Kaufman: Well, firstly people need to realise the independent pathway is the pathway to oblivion. If you want to make any money you are going to need to become a partner with one of the giant devil-worshipping media companies.
-
The industry has become an oligopoly of people like Rupert Murdoch and unless you partner up with his kind it’s hopeless. Well, you don’t need money any more. There are movies out there made for under £5,000 that are spectacular. So you can be a real person and have a decent position in society.

If you want to be part of that you’ve got to join a gang. All those people are sucking off the teat of Rupert Murdoch and all those people. It didn’t used to be that way. There used to be competition.

-
Sorry, but most people in mainstream cinema are scum. There are some good films but most of them are sausages. They are not films, they are making sausages.

Not everyone of course. James Gunn made a great movie with Guardians of the Galaxy but most of them are horrible. Dr Strange? That was just like 100 other $200m movie. Like sausages. No originality, no emotion.

Just safe, familiar baby food and as long as they brainwash the public enough people will go. That isn’t art.
-
A lot of people have never heard of Toxic Avenger. These days it’s all about Kim Kardashian, Leonardo DiCaprio and Merill Lynch. Give Casey Affleck and Oscar and let him settle out of court. It’s a fucked up system.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
This is actually pretty interesting viewed with 2017 eyes.

 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
This is all connected. PP shows it's hand and it isn't about "women's health care", it's about killing babies to control the population of undesirables. PP was founded on eugenics and is still all about eugenics.

Of course, the killing of undesirables is what Planned Parenthood is about. It supporters know that, too. That is why Planned Parenthood locates in poor communities, particularly minority communities. It is no accident that for every 1000 live births by a black mother that there are 420 abortions.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
The deep state has struck out against Trump today.

Rachel Maddow Releases Trump Tax Returns

Despite committing a felony, it was a non-event as he paid $38M tax on $150M income. The real story should be who fed this to her from within Obummer's IRS? Anyhow, will she go to prison?

It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution


And who exactly is Rachel Maddow? Some unbiased news reporter with no agenda?

17309092_867674680037095_5178538641401145627_n.jpg


This whole interweb is sure putting a damper on the Globalist ability to control information. Watch them continue to try to censor the internet.
 

ilwrath

Active Member
Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
475
The deep state has struck out against Trump today.

Watch them continue to try to censor the internet.

Of course, the only way you can do that is by killing Net Neutrality laws, and stripping ISPs of FCC regulations such as Title II communications, and Section 706 requirements. In other words, the exact things Trump's pick of Ajit Pai is working on this very second.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
So a Federal Judge in Hawaii of all places blocks Trump's most recent "travel ban". Why? Let's take a closer look.

Obama Makes Surprise Visit to Hawaii 48 Hours Before Judge Blocks Trump Travel Ban

Hmm. Obama made a surprise visit to Hawaii and visited areas within minutes of the courthouse and the judges home. Coincidence? This judge was a classmate of the Obama at Harvard and graduated the same year as him. Obama appointed this judge and is said to be personal friends of his.

Gee golly, still a coincidence right? I mean Hawaii is as leftist as you can get for a state, so certainly they are doing their part when if comes to refugees?

HYPOCRITES: Hawaii to Ignore ‘Travel Ban.’ But They Weren’t Taking Refugees Anyway…

This week, Hawaii virtue signaled to the world that, yes, they too would oppose Trump’s so-called “travel ban” (which simply vets people from certain terroristy countries from entering the USA). How woke, lofty and noble of Hawaii. Except… they weren’t taking refugees to begin with.

This week, Hawaii virtue signaled to the world that, yes, they too would oppose Trump’s so-called “travel ban” (which simply vets people from certain terroristy countries from entering the USA). How woke, lofty and noble of Hawaii. Except… they weren’t taking refugees to begin with.

Aaaaawwwwkwaaaaaard!

In Fiscal year 2015, Hawaii accepted seven refugees as per records from the Office of Refugee Resettlement. The recorded refugee acceptance for that fiscal year, only District of Columbia accepted fewer refugees with five for the same period.

The seven refugees the state accepted, one came from Ukraine, one from China and five from Burma. Notably, none of the refugees came from any terror-torn countries in the Middle East.

Which means what Hawaii is doing now is what leftists world-wide do every day: change and enforce the rules for everyone but themselves. Shorter: embody douchbaggery. Shorter still: asshats.

Obama/Soros still pulling strings, making their puppets move.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
I told you this was coming! It would have been fast tracked with Hildabeast & TPP (Hillary was for TPP, don't fool yourself), but the Globalists are trying other methods since both TPP and Hildabeast were defeated.

New York Assemblyman Unveils Bill To Suppress Non-Government-Approved Free Speech (not satire)

In a bill aimed at securing a "right to be forgotten," introduced by Assemblyman David I. Weprin and (as Senate Bill 4561 by state Sen. Tony Avella), liberal New York politicians would require people to remove ‘inaccurate,’ ‘irrelevant,’ ‘inadequate’ or ‘excessive’ statements about others...
  • Within 30 days of a ”request from an individual,”
  • “all search engines and online speakers] shall remove … content about such individual, and links or indexes to any of the same, that is ‘inaccurate’, ‘irrelevant’, ‘inadequate’ or ‘excessive,’ ”
  • “and without replacing such removed … content with any disclaimer [or] takedown notice.”
  • “ ‘naccurate’, ‘irrelevant’, ‘inadequate’, or ‘excessive’ shall mean content,”
    [*]“which after a significant lapse in time from its first publication,”
    [*]“is no longer material to current public debate or discourse,”
    [*]“especially when considered in light of the financial, reputational and/or demonstrable other harm that the information … is causing to the requester’s professional, financial, reputational or other interest,”
    [*]“with the exception of content related to convicted felonies, legal matters relating to violence, or a matter that is of significant current public interest, and as to which the requester’s role with regard to the matter is central and substantial.”

Failure to comply would make the search engines or speakers liable for, at least, statutory damages of $250/day plus attorney fees.

As The Washington Post's Eugene Volokh rages, under this bill, newspapers, scholarly works, copies of books on Google Books and Amazon, online encyclopedias (Wikipedia and others) — all would have to be censored whenever a judge and jury found (or the author expected them to find) that the speech was “no longer material to current public debate or discourse” (except when it was “related to convicted felonies” or “legal matters relating to violence” in which the subject played a “central and substantial” role).

And of course the bill contains no exception even for material of genuine historical interest; after all, such speech would have to be removed if it was “no longer material to current public debate.” Nor is there an exception for autobiographic material, whether in a book, on a blog or anywhere else. Nor is there an exception for political figures, prominent businesspeople and others.

But the deeper problem with the bill is simply that it aims to censor what people say, under a broad, vague test based on what the government thinks the public should or shouldn’t be discussing. It is clearly unconstitutional under current First Amendment law, and I hope First Amendment law will stay that way (no matter what rules other countries might have adopted).
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
At least we now know that drinking babies blood doesn't make you immortal - but 101 though. Hmm. Maybe it works a bit.

Indeed. It is rather odd the top of the top of the so called "Elites" all sem to live much, much longer than the average Joe Sixpack.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
He crawled into my head and channeled my words through his mouth! :eek:

 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
I don't think this is an accident, so will drop it here. There is a reason Globlalist stooges hate the US Constitution, and the first (and second) Amendment.

Canadian Parliament Passes Controversial Islamophobia Motion

The Canadian House of Commons has passed motion M103 which singles out the criticism of Islam as a form of “Islamophobia”. Critics condemn it as an attack on free speech.

Well duh!

The text of the motion does not clarify what constitutes “Islamophobia” and has led many to speculate what that may mean in the future, with some critics fearing it could lead to Shariah law courts.

Duh!

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who during the election campaign championed Muslim women wearing hijabs and full face niqabs, dropped an appeal by the previous government that would not allow women to wear niqabs to Canadian citizenship ceremonies.

Trudeau has also appeared at many mosques, including one where the women weren’t allowed in the main prayer room with the men but were forced to pray in a separate area upstairs.


This is what happens when you elect a Soros stooge.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
Rather odd considering Soros was a literal Nazi Collaborator that openly stated it was the best time of his life. Why would he not like a shell casing? Oh right, only the Nazis can have bullets.

4-year-old Suspended from Pre-School For Shell Casing!

“The Collinsville mom behind a viral Facebook post spoke to Fox 2/News 11 Wednesday. Her son, Hunter, 4, has been suspended from his preschool for bringing a shell casing from a fired bullet to school.

He’d been at the preschool for about a year, she said, and now was in tears. Neither she nor Hunter’s dad knew it, but he found something he thought was pretty neat and he took it to school Tuesday to show his friends.

“This is a spent .22 caliber bullet casing,” Kristy Jackson said, holding the object that got Hunter into so much trouble.”

The mystery of where Hunter came across the shell was quickly solved. The Fox2 story continues:

It turns out the casing came from a visit with Hunter’s grandpa who is a Caseyville police officer, Jackson said.

He’s made it a point to teach Hunter about hunting and responsible gun use at a young age.


17362444_10157040166533647_7752315188389371335_n.jpg


Gotta demasculate them young and indoctrinate them to never touch a fire arm! A .22 shell casing is so dangerous donchaknow? :rolleyes:
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
Funny how Libertards/Leftists are so eager to accept the revisionist history that only white Americans ever owned slaves.

UN DEMANDS America Pay Black People. For… Slavery

That’s right, the UN is cracking down on slavery… From hundreds of years ago, that is. Not to be confused with current slavery. You know, like what’s going on in the Middle East or Africa right now. Because that stuff isn’t pressing – but you know what is? Giving tons of money to people who were born years after slavery and racism were abolished in America. See, the UN says they deserve it because cops are mean.

The sheeple are so stupid they actually think the only people to ever own slaves were white Americans. They also think every white American owned slaves at the time, not the 1.5% reality.

The UN knows exactly what it is doing. They continue to play the leftist sheeple as the complete and total chump fool morons they are.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,975
Reaction score
2,030
The Globalists hate Putin already. This could get very interesting. I'm sure this will make Fluffy happy.

Russia threatens to leak info Obama would want to ‘keep secret’

During a press conference on Friday, Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova dropped a bombshell that her country has damaging information the Obama administration asked them to “keep secret” — and they just might leak it.

While answering a question about how she sees “the future of Russian-US diplomatic relations in the context of the current atmosphere in Washington,” Zakharova said they have soured over the last few years.

She used as her example, the announcement of details for official visits, according to an English transcript provided by the Kremlin.

“To tell the truth,” Zakharova said, “over the past few years we’ve seen many strange things happen in Washington in connection with preparations for visits or talks by our foreign ministers. The US Department of State has more than once asked us not to announce planned visits until the last minute. This is not our tradition. We have been operating openly for years, but we have respected the requests we have received from our colleagues in Washington in the past few years.

“But what happened after that? First, the US Department of State asked us to keep the planned visit quiet and not to announce it until the last possible minute, until we coordinated the date. We did as they asked. But a day or two later the information was leaked by the US State Department and sometimes by the US administration. Frankly, this put Russia and the media in a strange situation, because they didn’t know who to believe – the official agencies or the many leaks,” Zakharova said.

She said the Russian government would be transparent about such visits.

“As I said, such cases in our relations with the US Department of State have become a bad tradition over the past few years. So, I can say in response to your question that we will make the date and format of contacts between the Russian and US foreign ministers public after we coordinate them. We won’t keep them quiet.

“At this point, I don’t have any information I can share with you. I can say that this visit and such contacts are possible in principle, but it would be premature to talk about timeframes.”

She then said if things continue on the present course, it may be damaging for former President Barack Obama.

“Also, I would like to say that if the practice of leaking information that concerns not just the United States but also Russia, which has become a tradition in Washington in the past few years, continues, there will come a day when the media will publish leaks about the things that Washington asked us to keep secret, for example, things that happened during President Obama’s terms in office. Believe me, this could be very interesting information,” Zakharova said, according to the English transcript.

“Our American colleagues must decide if they respect the diplomatic procedure, if they keep their word on the arrangements made between us, primarily arrangements made at their own request, or we create a few very nice surprises for each other.”

Obummer secrets? Wait, I thought he was the "most transparent president in history"? :roll eyes:
 
Top