Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
14,966
Reaction score
2,154
Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal

In news that will surprise absolutely no one, a new study reveals that girly men are more likely to favor socialist policies. The study, conducted by researchers at Brunel University London, looked at the height, weight, physical strength, and bicep circumference of 171 men, along with their views on wealth redistribution and income inequality.

The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.
 
First of all, the sample size is very small. So, the findings should be taken with an adequate amount of salt.

Furthermore, it is worth pointing out that the study was done in a country where being conservative means raising the budget of your national 'socialist' single payer healthcare system by 8 billion UKP... In fact, the study found a correlation (not causation) between the amount of hours a particpant spend in a gym per week and views on 'wealth distribution'. Considering that athletes who are in the age group of this study are in fact more likely to require medical attention (due to a higher risk for self-inflicted injuries), it would have been extremely interesting to see how these supposedly anti-egalitarian gym rats would have felt about the idea of a completely privatized for-profit healthcare system in which each patient fully pays for their own medical bills...
 
:lol:
So does that mean strong men tend to be fascists?
 
First of all, the sample size is very small. So, the findings should be taken with an adequate amount of salt.

Have you watched videos of Antifa? Like, any of them?

 
I am strong but gentle. This has always left me confused about my identity :(
 

There is no great surprise in this statement. What it boils down to is essentially, people who can take whatever they want from other people have no problem with a system that allows them to do that, but those from whom things are taken find it less congenial. Those that can dominate don't have to worry so much about playing nice. Those at the other end have to build broader alliances and have to be more accommodating of a wider variety of views because they need a bigger tent.
 
So a caveman knocks down a guy he totally knows he can take - what's the point you are trying to prove?

It isn't just this one example, but in this example the guy didn't lay his hand on the wimp first either. Someone tries shoving me, I'd lay them out too.

Watch any video of antifa and you will notice they are all tiny girly men, which is why they stay in packs and usually have weapons. It is always Antifa starting the violence anyhow, so they can't whine when someone strikes back.
 
f10c321c01885be37b440485a493b368e509fef486353e53b1c44255bbb00422.jpg
 
Back
Top