The Great Whyzzat "Liberals Ruin Everything" Files

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
As we saw with the total desecration of the "Ghostbusters" reboot, which was such a bomb that it burried the entire franchise for decades to come, liberals ruin everything they touch. Let's track their epic failures in Hollywood here.

They decided to ruin Goldie Hawn's career for the rest of her life. She came out of a self imposed 15 year retirement, for a historic train wreck of a film.

Snatched (2017) IMDB
2.5/10 Stars

No One Wants To See ‘Snatched’ With Amy Schumer
Do you think Amy will blame this failure on “alt-right trolls,” too?

Yeah probably! She'll need a scapegoat even though she's getting friendly fire from fellow Libertards too.

Liberals target their own when it suits them, as new movie 'Snatched' is called racist and xenophobic

But with her film now exposed to audiences and critics, Schumer is facing backlash from her own side, the same side her comedy and political rants are supporting.

The New York Times has claimed “Snatched” is racist and said it is populated by “dark-skinned thugs with funny accents” who are killed off just for “laughs.”

The headline in the Village Voice was even harsher: “‘Snatched’ Is Perfect for Mother’s Day if Mom Hates and Fears Other Countries.” Ouch.

The movie has been called everything from racist to xenophobic to lazy. It appears Amy Schumer's past attempts to cater to the Left and the politically correct of this world have failed because they think she and her movie are racist.


Besides just being a talentless hack who is in a bottom feeding worst of the worst type of movie, Schumer is now finding out that it isn't an idea to support an ideology that demonizes white people, when you yourself are a white person. Pandering ain't gonna give you a pass.

Libertards ruin everything. Libertards just ruined Goldie Hawn's legacy.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
Here's what happens if you are a conservative in Hollywood and speak your mind.

Tim Allen’s curiously canceled conservative ‘Last Man Standing’

“Last Man Standing,” the top-ranked television sitcom starring comedian Tim Allen, has been axed.

And fans are now wondering: Is it ‘cause Allen’s a conservative? Well, here’s a thought: Of course it is. Why else?

The network’s side is — silence. The unstated argument? Don’t be a conspiracy theorist. It’s all about the ratings, ratings, ratings.

But then again, ratings for the show, in its sixth season, were top. As Deadline reported, the show was the second-highest comedy this past season, second only to “Modern Family.” And for a contrast in numbers?

“Last Man Standing” brought in 8.1 million viewers. “Modern Family” averaged around 8.7 million.


Gee, terrible numbers? Oh, wait...

As one tweeted, noted by Fox News: “Last Man Standing was the last thing I was watching on @ABC anyways. Bummed it’s gone, but they can’t handle conservatism apparently. #weak.”

Another: “Wow ABC good job showing free speech by ending a conservative tv show cause you don’t agree with it.

And one more: “I am so upset that #ABC has decided to cancel Last Man Standing because Tim Allen is conservative. It’s funny.”

Allen, a staunch supporter of President Donald Trump, has played a conservative voice on his “Last Man Standing” show as well, oftentimes mocking the liberal line of thought and the Democratic Party’s policies — particularly the ones that fuel and fire up the snowflake insensibilities.

The long-time comedian just went on Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night talk show in March to say: “You got to be real careful around here [Hollywood]. You get beat up if you don’t believe what everybody else believes. This is like ‘30s Germany.”

Indeed.


That last part? It was just less than 2 months ago, and exactly what he predicted came true. Top rated show, but dare to speak out as a conservative? Begone! We've killed your career!!

 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
As we saw with the total desecration of the "Ghostbusters" reboot, which was such a bomb that it burried the entire franchise for decades to come, liberals ruin everything they touch. Let's track their epic failures in Hollywood here.

They decided to ruin Goldie Hawn's career for the rest of her life. She came out of a self imposed 15 year retirement, for a historic train wreck of a film.

Snatched (2017) IMDB
2.5/10 Stars

No One Wants To See ‘Snatched’ With Amy Schumer
Do you think Amy will blame this failure on “alt-right trolls,” too?

Yeah probably! She'll need a scapegoat even though she's getting friendly fire from fellow Libertards too.

Liberals target their own when it suits them, as new movie 'Snatched' is called racist and xenophobic

But with her film now exposed to audiences and critics, Schumer is facing backlash from her own side, the same side her comedy and political rants are supporting.

The New York Times has claimed “Snatched” is racist and said it is populated by “dark-skinned thugs with funny accents” who are killed off just for “laughs.”

The headline in the Village Voice was even harsher: “‘Snatched’ Is Perfect for Mother’s Day if Mom Hates and Fears Other Countries.” Ouch.

The movie has been called everything from racist to xenophobic to lazy. It appears Amy Schumer's past attempts to cater to the Left and the politically correct of this world have failed because they think she and her movie are racist.


Besides just being a talentless hack who is in a bottom feeding worst of the worst type of movie, Schumer is now finding out that it isn't an idea to support an ideology that demonizes white people, when you yourself are a white person. Pandering ain't gonna give you a pass.

Libertards ruin everything. Libertards just ruined Goldie Hawn's legacy.

Funny how anyone with a brain sees the trainwreck before it happens, except the Libertard echo chamber in Hollywood.

5 Key Lessons from ‘Snatched’s’ Box Office Fizzle

-snip-

Yet those box office figures aren’t impressive. Here are five reasons why they suggest Schumer’s fledgling film career already looks dubious.

Schumer’s Brand Is Officially Toxic

Schumer isn’t just a take-no-prisoners comic, the kind we haven’t seen since Sarah Silverman first opened up her potty mouth. She’s aggressively political. Schumer uses her bully pulpit like … a bully. She savaged gun rights advocates on her TV show “Inside Amy Schumer” and her limp Netflix comedy special.

She speaks out in the press about her political views. And, of course, she famously called Trump supporters KKK members on social media.

Think that doesn’t leave some sort of mark?

-snip-
 

JoBBo

Member
Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2005
Messages
517
Reaction score
138
But then again, ratings for the show, in its sixth season, were top. As Deadline reported, the show was the second-highest comedy this past season, second only to “Modern Family.”
On ad-financed channels, such as ABC, the total number of viewers is not even remotely as important as the ratings in the advertiser-coveted 'demo' (of 18-49 year-olds) as this is the number that dictates what prices you can charge per TV advert. (ABC did not make these rules... They just have to work with them.)

In its very first season in 2011/2012, "Last Man Standing" had an average 'demo' rating of 2.4, which is quite good, and an average total viewership of 8.6 million per episode. By comparison, the most recent season had an average 1.15 'demo' rating, which - since the article made that comparison - is well below Modern Family's numbers (and far below The Big Bang Theory on CBS, for instance), and an average total viewership of 6.4 million.

Top rated show, but dare to speak out as a conservative? Begone! We've killed your career!!
Right... A well-known 'conservative' in Hollywood ... who has ranted publicly against liberals for years... who plays a conservative character and makes fun of liberals in every episode of his TV show.... who is paid millions and millions of dollars every season... "only" gets 6 SEASONS on the air.

ABC are pretty bad at killing careers as far as I can tell... They also cancelled all their other Friday night comedies headlined by "fellow Hollywood marxists" to hide that it was all part of a big anti-conservative conspiracy.

If that is a career being killed, I am sure there are thousands of struggling actors and comedians in Hollywood who would love to sign up as a Republican so they can live through the same "ordeal".
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
Right... A well-known 'conservative' in Hollywood ... who has ranted publicly against liberals for years... who plays a conservative character and makes fun of liberals in every episode of his TV show.... who is paid millions and millions of dollars every season... "only" gets 6 SEASONS on the air.

You seem to miss the point entirely. Tim Allen has actually been pretty quiet about his political views. The first time I even found out he was a conservative was when he went on Jimmy Kimmel and made his now famous statement about being a conservative in Hollywood and having to hide it, comparing to being a Jew in Nazi Germany. After 6 seasons he makes this statement that went extremely viral, and almost immediately the show is canceled. If you can't see the connection, I can't help you.
 

JoBBo

Member
Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2005
Messages
517
Reaction score
138
You seem to miss the point entirely.
I did not miss the point at all. You just choose to ignore all the facts that do not fit to yet another one of your simplistic conspiracy theories.

In reality, the most recent season of Allen's show had slipped quite a bit in the ratings that advertisers care about. Plus, ABC gave up on all comedies on Friday which indicates that this was a strategic decision, not something that was focused on a single show.

Tim Allen has actually been pretty quiet about his political views. The first time I even found out he was a conservative was when he went on Jimmy Kimmel and made his now famous statement about being a conservative in Hollywood and having to hide it, comparing to being a Jew in Nazi Germany. After 6 seasons he makes this statement that went extremely viral, and almost immediately the show is canceled. If you can't see the connection, I can't help you.
He has made plenty of public statements for years including several appearances on Fox News. For instance, while the article you quoted called him a "Trump supporter", I have not only known for years that he is a 'conservative' but I also remember very well that he stated Trump "says a lot of stupid stuff" (duh!) and endorsed Kasich for president... Kasich even used Allen's voice in advertisements!
 

Kesa

Member
Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
352
Reaction score
128
Don't forget that liberals gave us star trek so they can't be that bad.
 

Kesa

Member
Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
352
Reaction score
128
If i have any gripes i would say that feminism is going too far. I am all for female empowerment but more often than not it is overpowerment in that when i see a woman i know she is going to have some kind of extraordinary power just because she's a woman. It makes for predictable storytelling.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
Don't forget that liberals gave us star trek so they can't be that bad.

STAR TREK: DISCOVERY

Not a single negative review by critics? I just completely lost faith in the so called professionals that this site pools from. If great production is all it takes to dazzle, it doesn't say much for the future.

I seriously wanted to love this. I am a Trek fan for sure, but would fail on all but the easiest trivia. I don't care about if it stays true to timelines or technology and never have. It's always been about the storytelling and thoughts it provokes. This feels like a high school script with a Hollywood production budget. I take that back. A high schooler with passion could do better.
 

Kesa

Member
Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
352
Reaction score
128
There was criticism a while ago about the lack of white people but I haven't seen the show yet because i don't have an internet connection. I am using only my phone for internet so must be careful.

To be honest i have a tradition of disliking Star Trek shows when i first encounter them. The first time i saw Voyager and DS9 i was unimpressed and bored but over time i came to really enjoy them. ST: Enterprise i really disliked because it wasn't canon but it has grown on me and am now more forgiving.

The new JJ Abrams movies on the other hand are complete garbage. I refuse to watch them. The movies are so dumbed down only 15 year old's could enjoy them.

I am thinking maybe ST: Discovery could find a place with the disgruntled fans the Abram movies have alienated?
 

Kesa

Member
Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
352
Reaction score
128
Speaking of trivia did you notice the uniform insignias are wrong? In that era every starship had a unique insignia until Kirks first 5 year mission at which point the Enterprise insignia was adopted by all Starfleet. ST: Discovery is based 5(?) years before Kirks 5 year mission.
 

ilwrath

Active Member
Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
475
STAR TREK: DISCOVERY

Not a single negative review by critics? I just completely lost faith in the so called professionals that this site pools from. If great production is all it takes to dazzle, it doesn't say much for the future.

I seriously wanted to love this. I am a Trek fan for sure, but would fail on all but the easiest trivia. I don't care about if it stays true to timelines or technology and never have. It's always been about the storytelling and thoughts it provokes. This feels like a high school script with a Hollywood production budget. I take that back. A high schooler with passion could do better.

Has anyone even watched Star Trek: Discovery? When you put a show no one cares about behind a paywall, people tend to shrug and ignore it. I know I have. I might have watched an episode or two if they were free, but I'm not shelling out for something unknown from a brand so tarnished. I'm sure I could don the ole' pirate hat and download it somewhere, but at this point, I'm so far out of that scene that I wouldn't even know where to go to find out where to go to get it. I'd literally be hitting up Duck Duck Go, or something.

I used to be a big Trek fan, too. But after they let Abrams shit all over the universe, I truly stopped caring. In hindsight, Star Trek's quality started fading around the time DS9 started trying to become Babylon 5. It just took me a few series more before I couldn't stomach it, anymore.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
Has anyone even watched Star Trek: Discovery?

Nope! I've never been a Star Trek fan. I've at times when I was younger watched the original series when rerun, but partially for the campiness. I don't think I've even sat through any of the original movies all the way through. When Star Trek NG came out I think I watched half the first episode. That's the last time I gave any Star Trek a chance.

Here's the thing, Star Trek has always had a leftist political slant since the very beginning. Their hardcore fans know this and never had a problem with it. The complaints I have heard about Discovery are coming from Star Trek fanboys. They claim the writing and story-lines are god-awful and the political angle is overwhelming. I've heard viewership is plummeting. Supposedly it is was renewed for a second season long ago, but no one expects a third season based on plummeting viewership.

Just second hand and third hand rumblings I've heard.
 

ilwrath

Active Member
Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
1,199
Reaction score
475
Here's the thing, Star Trek has always had a leftist political slant since the very beginning. Their hardcore fans know this and never had a problem with it.

Well, I'll admit, it was a bit leftist in tone. It was subtle, though. And it fit well with the general optimistic look at the future Trek offered. To me, that was the defining feature of Star Trek vs your average Sci-Fi fare. Star Trek is supposed to be unabashedly optimistic. The idea that we'd have a box in the wall that could make any damn thing we needed at that moment isn't what defined Star Trek. The idea that we'd actually use it as a tool to really eliminate poverty and hunger amongst our people, to me, that is what defined Star Trek. The idea that things might actually get better. That a post-scarcity future might actually bring about a renaissance rather than a mad power struggle. That was my Star Trek. I haven't really seen evidence of that kind of forethought in anything with the Star Trek name in a long time.
 

Kesa

Member
Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
352
Reaction score
128
If i could make any criticisms on trek is that it is supposed to be a humanity united utopia spreading peace, love and enlightenment across the galaxy but it is really about America vs everyone else. As a non American i always found Starfleet kind of annoying. I always found the non humans more interesting but that was a problem because well, if you are not an American you are stupid and evil.
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
Well, I'll admit, it was a bit leftist in tone. It was subtle, though. And it fit well with the general optimistic look at the future Trek offered. To me, that was the defining feature of Star Trek vs your average Sci-Fi fare.

To be clear when I did watch the original Star Trek I didn't care about tone. I also didn't not watch (yes, double negative) any of the later output due to it, it just didn't resonate with me. I like the original Star Trek partially for the campiness, but also it was pretty much in a class of it's own with it's vision of the future and of space travel. Nothing I tried to watch after that broke any new ground IMO and the campiness was gone.

Also, if I didn't accept subtle leftist tone, I wouldn't have much of a choice in music or movies the last few decades. If the substance to it is high quality, I can overlook the undertones. When there is no substance and it is just a lazy way to push through a heavy-handed political view or outright propaganda, I simply tune out completely.

I'll admit that if something like a movie came out with an extreme right-wing message, I might be shocked enough to go see it. Just it's very existence would be shocking enough. Think of an end-of-the-world blockbuster not based on the premise that Global Warming is what killed us, but the Globalists following through on Agenda 21, Illuminati and Georgia Guidestones trying to liquidate 99% of the world's population to return the planet to nature and rid it of man. I'd go see it. Now if that became the new norm and every single TV show and every single Hollywood Blockbuster was doing the same thing and getting lazy about it? I'd get tired of it really, really quick.

Maybe that is finally happening to even the left. Maybe they are tired of politics over substance at long last.

/rant
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
Paul's letter to Rolling Stone on their ignoring Eric Carr's death.

23915999_10212714073265108_7011889441416459553_n.jpg
 

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
13,976
Reaction score
2,030
U.S. News Crowns California Worst State for ‘Quality of Life’

U.S. News found that California’s infrastructure and housing availability have not kept up with an immigrant population surge over the last two decades. Three in 10 Californians were born outside the U.S. — the highest in the nation — with about half of the immigrants moving up from Latin America and about 39 percent coming from Asia.

Breitbart News reported in December that Southern California’s resident population experienced a “net domestic outmigration” of 64,953 for the last 12-month period. About 85 percent of California’s outmigration was concentrated in the middle 20 percent income bracket and the next lower quintile bracket.
 
Top