Dammy you are wrong

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
14,974
Reaction score
2,156
No I am not back, but I have to post this. Dammy you are wrong about Ron Paul.


A real republican would not blindly support Romney. We have to get away from the bullshit 2 party system. It is complete bullshit. Obama is a total piece of shit. Romney is a total piece of shit
 
Which is a story titled "Ron Paul Is Basically Dropping Out" because they can't say "Ron Paul Is Dropping Out" since that would be a lie - but they want it to read like "Ron Paul Is Dropping Out". That "Basically" makes it an opinion, so they're safe.

He's not going to waste any more money on big ads because he doesn't have to fight anyone but Mitt now. He's running with his enthusiastic ground teams (that's where stuff happens). He brings in the people through his network now. He's probably fine with going underground right now as it will make it harder for Mitt to bring in voters if everyone thinks it's all sown up. Only the RP people will bother to show. Mitt might even have to run some ads mentioning that Ron Paul is still in the race just to get some people out for him.

Ron Paul will continue fighting were it counts - for delegates - just as he has been doing.
 
What exactly will the Paul delegates want from the GOP platform that won’t be in there anyway??
I’m reasonably sure debt and spending will be covered

There are only 11 primaries left. but two of those left are Kentucky and Texas. Santorum decided to quit before Pennsylvania to spare himself the bad press of home field loss.
 
What exactly will the Paul delegates want from the GOP platform that won’t be in there anyway??
Bringing the troops home and winding down world military engagements.
Deep cuts to the military (funding only defense).
Ending the Federal Reserve.
Legalizing Marijuana.
Repealing the NDAA and the PATRIOT act.

I'm sure there will be common ground in the area of deregulation, but I'm pretty sure those points I just listed won't be near the top of the GOP priorities.
 
What exactly will the Paul delegates want from the GOP platform that won’t be in there anyway??
I’m reasonably sure debt and spending will be covered

im not a paulite by any stretch but im sure he knows what mittens has planned for this country, and is no more "comfortable" about it than he is with obamas plan...
 
You can stick a fork in Paul, because he is done.

Well why isn't he quitting?

Same reason that Newt didn't quit. If you quit, then you can't continue to collect political donations to pay off your political debts. They (all the other candidates) will quit after the convention. If they haven't paid off all their political debts by then, they will make the rounds giving speeches for a fee, to pay off those debts.

Also, as stated in this video, someone might take out Romney before the convention, then where would Ron Paul be if he has already quit? Don't be too quick to scoff at that idea, because it has happened multiple times before.

But here is the deal. Will Ron Paul supporters stick out their bottom lip, pick up their ball, and go home?

That's what the Socialists/Progressives/Democrats are praying for. That's what Fluffy and his toadies hope you will do. You have got to remember who your dealing with here. If the shoe were on the other foot and Ron Paul had that big lead and Romney had few delegates, those same Socialists/Progressives/Democrats that say that Ron Paul is the best Republican candidate now, would be singing the praises of Romney and demonizing Ron Paul.

All those folks on Whyzzat that were in love with Obama last election, who now think he stinks, because he did exactly the things he said he would do, now look very foolish.

You can try to deny it all you want, but people remember who you are. That's why your opinions on American politics don't amount to squat.

Amen.
 
i know my vote dont count... i live in kansas... but i voted to put buddy roemer on the ticket... he's actually ron paul without elite approval... you know they been financing a third party since they realized we were too evenly divided... ross perot for example... dr paul is largely a good man i think; but if he were given the reigns, would he go this way or that?, all my instincts balk... mr roemer talks to me like eisenhower should have, but when he had a chance, one of histories most favoured generals bailed on the same nation he swore a lifelong oath to protect. eisenhowers failure to rise to that moment in history can be attributed to a good many things in his personal life at the time, much probably just due to the way old soldiers think when they get old... the generals always know where diplomacy will fail...after a lifetime of loyal service to this nation, old ike got tired... buddy seems strong and ready and he's willing to put an end to it all by executive order...for profit prisons, drug war, oil wars, all of it, quit shipping jobs overseas,merchants of death, patriot act, common sense immigration reform, finance reform, CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM.... and thats what i want to hear from a man that wants to lead the free world... im an american... i been in worse shape than this nation is now... just gotta stand up and fix it...
 
Well why isn't he quitting?

Same reason that Newt didn't quit. If you quit, then you can't continue to collect political donations to pay off your political debts.
Ron Paul is currently debt free.

That's what the Socialists/Progressives/Democrats are praying for. That's what Fluffy and his toadies hope you will do.
The question is, will the libertarians rather vote for Obama, White-Mormon-Obama, or stay home?

If the shoe were on the other foot and Ron Paul had that big lead and Romney had few delegates, those same Socialists/Progressives/Democrats that say that Ron Paul is the best Republican candidate now, would be singing the praises of Romney and demonizing Ron Paul.
Nah. You don't appear to understand at all.

All those folks on Whyzzat that were in love with Obama last election, who now think he stinks, because he did exactly the things he said he would do, now look very foolish.
You live in fantasy land. Even the unions voted Republican in 2010 because they were so hacked off at Obama for failing to do the important stuff he said he'd do.
You can try to deny it all you want, but people remember who you are.
Or we could just let people go through the whyzzat history and see that you are not telling the truth.
 
Secret Service spokesman Brian Leary said "We are aware of this issue and we are conducting the appropriate follow-up." Threatening the life of a major presidential candidate is against federal law and carries a fine or sentence of up to five years in federal prison.

oh my gawd....!!!!:lol:... jeezum petes... is he or isnt he, bet some media shill saw that release and laughed in a pavlovian fashion as theyve been trained... are they protecting that jailed feller that got 40% against obama too? prison dangerous place to be... wouldnt look too cool if president of free world had butch the cellmate story... this election season is gonna be better than CHRISTMAS!!!!
 
Yeah but he will need a war chest to run for reelection in Texas and won't get much from home. Gotta get it while he can, cause he is going to have a hard time back home.
----------------------------

I watched most of it, slow link up at the lake.

I invite any and all newcomers to go over the old threads. I won't argue the point with you, I'll let your own words speak for themselves.
 
No I am not back, but I have to post this. Dammy you are wrong about Ron Paul.

Why was he financially backed by Bilderberg Steering Committee member? Why did Ron Paul join in with Barney Frank (and to be fair, two other idiot congress critters) while 11 of the 14 working group is paid by Soros, directly or indirectly? Romney has the nomination, and Ron Paul's money dries up and he stops campaigning. Connect the freaking dots Red, connect the freaking dots.
 
i too would be happier knowing he was on here hating me than patrolling his florida neighborhood promoting "stand your ground laws".... heh heh :lol:
yeah, there's NO way I'm going to FL. I own too many jackets with hoods. :lol:
 
The question is, will the libertarians rather vote for Obama, White-Mormon-Obama, or stay home?

That's the only hope Obama has, the Tea Party folks stay at home rather then vote for a Socialist. Problem is, Tea Party is scared that the Marxist will ruin their country beyond anyone's redemption if he is given another four years. Rahm's old saying of "Never let a crises go to waste" will come true during these upcoming bad times, and the Tea Party knows it. Tea Party knows the Marxist will push for unbelievable power and authority to upsert the US Constitution when people are scared and hungry.

Tea Party has to make a decision on which Global Elite faction to back. End product will be different, one has a glimmer of hope of an intact US Constitution vs complete subjectation of rights and economic freedoms by Marxist. Lousy choice, but it might be the last choice any American may ever have for a very long time.

Libertarians will vote for their Party's candidate in those states which they already know what the outcome is going to be. Question is for the Libertarians in the swing states, will they vote for their party's candidate which means the directly opposite to their core beliefs will gain power over them that knows no bounds since he can not be re-elected. It will be interesting to see if the swing state Libertarians stick with their ideolog candidate or opt for the prudent candidate. No Fluffy, I can't see the Libertarians voting for a Marxist nor sitting at home, tyranny is knocking at their door and they know it.
 
Romney has the nomination, and Ron Paul's money dries up and he stops campaigning. Connect the freaking dots Red, connect the freaking dots.
That either means Soros is out of money OR Soros was funding Ron Paul to make Romney the GOP candidate because Santorum so had a chance otherwise.

(Paul isn't drawing any votes from anyone. Paul brings his own votes to the party.)
 
That's the only hope Obama has, the Tea Party folks stay at home rather then vote for a Socialist.
Much of the Tea Party has been co-opted but a large percentage of them are Ron Paul supporters and were back when Ron Paul was throwing Tea Parties, before the Tea Party started.

Tea Party knows the Marxist will push for unbelievable power and authority to upsert the US Constitution when people are scared and hungry.
If by Marxist you mean the Oligarchs ...
Tea Party has to make a decision on which Global Elite faction to back.
The lesser of two evils is still evil. The Tea Party is captured, but they don't even have the capacity to know who they are really backing. They are, in fact, backing exactly the same oligarchs as the other parties. It's just a new flavour to capture those dissatisfied with the other products. I can't convince you of that, I know, but I've seen who they've voted for.

It will be interesting to see if the swing state Libertarians stick with their ideolog candidate or opt for the prudent candidate. No Fluffy, I can't see the Libertarians voting for a Marxist nor sitting at home, tyranny is knocking at their door and they know it.
The only way to get what you want is to fight for what you want, not go along with what you don't want. If having things worsen is what it takes to wake people up then that will have to be what happens. Why vote for something that you don't want when you can have a clear conscience when the worst happens and at the same time you can show that there IS another way. People who pretend that there is a "prudent" candidate just perpetuate the system and the elites know that they are weak and unprincipled and can be shafted.
 
Back
Top