Alan Keyes calls Obama a radical communist

the_leander said:
Oh look, another yank displaying their ignorance on what communism is.
I agree communism is something we should be worried about. The misuse and overuse of the word does nothing more than devalue the item. If real communism comes to the USA most people will be so used to the Republicans crying wolf that they'll ignore the true cries for help.
 
Not just your run of the mill commie, but a radical one too. Careful Red, you'll soon be running out of extremist vocabulary to use on Obama. :roll:
 
Funny stuff guys, considering his own advisors openly admit to being "radical Communist" and White House X-mas tree has a Mao Tse-Tung ornament. Not to admit Obama's own writings...

Hmmm... 2+2 must equal 5 in Obamaland
 
Obama_XmasTree2009_Mao.jpg
 
President Obama was a member of a communist organization called "New Party" in 1995-1996. He was trained by Marxist Professors (his own words).

President Obama stated that a mentor to him in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis, who was a member of the Communist Party. He writes in his book that when he was "confused", he would seek out communist rallies with Marxist speakers.

President Obama's book was written by a communist (Bill Ayers)

President Obama hired communist advisors and czars.
 
One more link and I get back to work. This read from Oct 08 is worth it.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/ ... ectio.html

What does it all mean for November 2008? It means that millions of modern Americans, when they hear that Barack Obama has deep roots with communist radicals like Bill Ayers and Frank Marshall Davis, don't care; they don't get it. Moreover, the leftist establishment -- from academia to media to Hollywood -- will not help them get it. To the contrary, the left responds to these accusations by not only downplaying or dismissing them but by ridiculing or even vilifying them, given the left's reflexive anti-anti-communism. The left will create bad guys out of the anti-communists who are legitimately blowing the whistle on the real bad guys.

When the leftists of the ‘60s took over higher education and the media, they really knew what they were doing. This was brilliant, masterful, a tactical slam-dunk, a tremendous coup for them and their worldview, with ripple effects we can scarcely imagine.

Does this mean that the McCain camp, talk radio and conservatives generally shouldn't bother exposing these things? Not at all. The truth is the truth, and needs to be told. Moderates especially need to be informed that Barack Obama is not your typical liberal: he is the most hard-left Democrat that his party has ever nominated for the presidency. It is absolutely not a coincidence that the man with these far-left associations just so happens to be ranked -- quantifiably, objectively, by non-partisan, respected sources like National Journal -- the most far-left member of the U.S. Senate, which is no small thing given the leftward drift of the modern Democratic Party. In other words, Obama's extremist associations matter; they are fully revealing, illustrative of the political-ideological realities that the pro-Obama media will not expose. His voting record bears this out.

That said, I warn my fellow conservatives: Be prepared to be really, really frustrated when few people seem to care.
 
redrumloa said:
That said, I warn my fellow conservatives: Be prepared to be really, really frustrated when few people seem to care.
Wow 1 enlightened fellow. I'm sure the other 50% of the population are just easily deluded. :roflmao:

Seriously Obama has been in charge for ~11 months. I think you'll find left wing liberals as disappointed as right wing conservatives. I'd put him a very small amount left of Clinton. Economically he's looking about as conservative as Clinton.

But, afterall Clinton was the best Republican president yet.

EDIT:misspelling.
 
cecilia said:
Speelgoedmannetje said:
:roflmao:

we have another Senator McCarthy to look under beds for commies

:roflmao:

hahahah....

White House X-mas tree has a Mao Tse-Tung ornament.

Not an *ornament*? Oh-my-God! Won't someone think of the children?
 
Back
Top