- Joined
- May 17, 2005
- Messages
- 12,258
- Reaction score
- 2,693
There was something that metalman stated here and that I had somewhat alluded to. The phrase he used was
This is similar to the environment that has been steadily building in the US (and the UK) and other places for the last decade in. During the lead-up to the Iraq war the media coordinated attacks against anyone who disagreed and talk radio personalities were able to issue death threats or call for people to kill certain people with contrary opinions with impunity.
During the Bush administration you had to agree with Bush. Now you have to agree with Obama. The reason is that they represent the same interests in many ways - and they are implementing the same plan.
As we get more and more social surveillance we get less and less freedoms to express contrary opinions - we all have to cry in the streets when Kim Jong Il dies (figuratively).
Jonathan Turley gives a great interview on C-SPAN about where things are going. (A little long but very interesting).
i.e. the public display must be in line with the expectation of the regime.Insufficient anguish could result "reeducation"
This is similar to the environment that has been steadily building in the US (and the UK) and other places for the last decade in. During the lead-up to the Iraq war the media coordinated attacks against anyone who disagreed and talk radio personalities were able to issue death threats or call for people to kill certain people with contrary opinions with impunity.
During the Bush administration you had to agree with Bush. Now you have to agree with Obama. The reason is that they represent the same interests in many ways - and they are implementing the same plan.
As we get more and more social surveillance we get less and less freedoms to express contrary opinions - we all have to cry in the streets when Kim Jong Il dies (figuratively).
Jonathan Turley gives a great interview on C-SPAN about where things are going. (A little long but very interesting).