Assange has been illegally detained

I smell a rat. I don't trust the UN for obvious reasons.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
You mean how they are like a wing of US policy in general.
Click to expand...

More like the US is a lapdog to the UN, who are lapdogs to the globalists elites. This concept has gone from conspiracy theory to undeniable facts in the last few years, largely due to Wikileaks. There was likely an attempt on Assange's life last week, but it was thwarted. They want to lure Assange out to have an easy target.



 
One of my favorite guys ever in politics, Ron Paul, has written a terrific article in defense of Assange. Not too long and well worth a read.

Assange’s Fate

Assange has done more than any single figure to expose the machinations of governments worldwide to murder and plunder the rest of us: as the declared enemy of the powerful, he is their principal target – and it behooves those of us who defend liberty and transparency to rally around the banner of Wikileaks.

Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since August of 2012, with governments all over the world – and especially our government – determined to get him, smear him, and discredit him by any means necessary. Yet he continues to expose them, even in these straitened circumstances, without regard for his own health, happiness, or ultimate fate. He is a hero for our times – in an age when the heroic seems entirely absent. And he is now in more danger than ever before: what with the leftist Ecuadorian government, eager to curry favor with Hillary Clinton, wavering in his defense, and with Mrs. Clinton herself wondering “Can’t we just drone this guy?”

Assange’s fate, whatever it turns out to be, limns our own: if he goes down, then, in a sense, so do we all. Because what that means is that there’s no room for truth-tellers in our world, and no tolerance for heroes. And that’s not the kind of world I care to live in.
 
redrumloa said:
Click to expand...
Do you ever hesitate and spend just a few seconds to do a quick online search for recent news about a subject or individual before you publicly share another outrageous (and obviously false) conspiracy theory?
 
JoBBo said:
Do you ever hesitate and spend just a few seconds to do a quick online search for recent news about a subject or individual before you publicly share another outrageous (and obviously false) conspiracy theory?
Click to expand...

As a matter of fact yes, yes I did. There has been no contact with Assange for quite some time now. I assume you are going to point to some Snopes article or something?
 
JoBBo said:
Is The Guardian too mainstream for you? The original seems to be here.
Click to expand...

A statement to a media outlet is hardly a proof of life. Please do follow the conspiracy theory a little closer. As for the second link, interesting.

r786eh.jpg
 
redrumloa said:
A statement to a media outlet is hardly a proof of life.
Click to expand...
It was not just any media outlet... It was justice4assange.

Also, Pamela Anderson visited him again last week.

Please do follow the conspiracy theory a little closer. As for the second link, interesting.
Click to expand...
Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me 100 times with bogus stories, ...
 
JoBBo said:
This is a problem on your end. Try a different browser or clean your cache. I checked the website's certificate and it will not expire before some time next year...
Click to expand...

Yup, that is just a generic certificate validation error from Firefox. The certificate I got from the site was resolved as valid from 12/1/16 to some time in March 2017. SSL certificates don't really offer verification or repudiation anyhow. They are merely an attempt to hinder the effectiveness of man-in-the-middle attacks.
 
Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers

A Wikileaks envoy today claims he personally received Clinton campaign emails in Washington D.C. after they were leaked by 'disgusted' whisteblowers - and not hacked by Russia.

Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.

'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'
 
redrumloa said:
A statement to a media outlet is hardly a proof of life. Please do follow the conspiracy theory a little closer.
Click to expand...
So, did his January interview with Fox News make you finally realize that this conspiracy theory is utter nonsense?

How about yesterday`s Periscope chat session with Assange?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top