Before the Israel/US/UK attack on Iran, some background

Nice spin job. I noticed they didn't get into Iran in the 30s and 40s back when they changed their name to Iran from Persia. That was after they began to support Hitler. Iran in Farsi means "Aryan." As far as their "peaceful" nuclear power goes: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-08/iran-worked-to-miniaturize-weapon-design.html Nor did the video go into the specific death loving Muslim sect that the heads of Iran practice. Nor did the video (think it was old, to be fair) go into the current regime's brutal put down of protesters that Obama failed to support. Nor did the video go into the threats to burn Israel (nuclear weapons maybe?) to the ground. Nor did the video go into Iran's use of Chemical weapons. Nor did the video go into the MRBM that Iran has now successfully launched.

So how is Canada taking the lead to solve this Crises?
 
This strikes me as an odd sub-heading:

What every Ron Paul Supporter & American Needs To Know
Click to expand...



Is RP pushing for an attack on Iran or something?
 
Dammy said:
I noticed they didn't get into Iran in the 30s and 40s back when they changed their name to Iran from Persia.
Click to expand...

Are you suggesting that the real reason to invade is because the country changed it's name or are you just falling back to your old Roger Irrelevant stance?

That was after they began to support Hitler.
Click to expand...

See above.

Iran in Farsi means "Aryan."
Click to expand...

Ditto.

Etcetera, etcetera.....
 
I think Dammy is suggesting that the Persians are romanticizing their old empire days, which may be true. And they certainly have a lot more enemies then just the US/UK/Israel. And to be honest, I find the current Iranian regime likes to fan the flames of hate towards the West a lot more than it needs to. In my opinion, the entire Iran vs US/Israel drama is a nationalistic ploy to draw support from the people. I see little reason for Iran to be at odds with the US/Isreal and vise verse. And no I don't think past conflicts contribute much to current events either.
 
Dammy said:
So how is Canada taking the lead to solve this Crises?
Click to expand...

You are implying that there is a crisis. It it a crisis of choice, however, manufactured by your government in collaboration with the UK and Israel, just as Saddam's WMD were - all built by PR companies to get you to support massive borrowing for military exploits to control the oil producing Middle East - oil which will be sold to you for the profit of the energy companies while you pay the debt and interest on the cost of winning it for them. Whenever the elites want more of your money all they have to do is scare you - and you scare so easily.
 
Personally, I'm not happy with Iran getting the bomb. I don't think anyone should be. I'm kinda surprised that Russia is taking the stance that it is, you'd think they'd be the first to object to having another nuclear power in such close proximity. However, I also think that a nuclear Iran is something we're just gonna have to get used to. I really don't see the military option here. A full invasion is out of the question, and a precision strike is way too risky and with potentially catastrophic consequences. The best option here is negotiations.
 
I know one thing: attacking Iran would cast a grim cloud over the liberal movement in the Arabian world.
 
metalman said:
What liberal movement in the Arab world?

Arabs consider the Iranians more of a threat than the Israelis
Click to expand...
The US controlled puppet states of the middle east are anything but liberal - that is to say, the leadership. The people, on the other hand, have different priorities. That's why they protest against their governments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top