Colin Powell Endorses Obama

ltstanfo

Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
578
Reaction score
42
I am finally impressed by someone who has endorsed Obama. Now I am just trying to understand why. From what I heard (and read) and read of Powell's comments on "Meet the Press", he offerred more (of what I regard as) platitudes to Barack than explainations for why he prefers him. Obviously he can support anyone he chooses but the decision does (at least a little) puzzle me.

While Colin Powell will always have the albatross of the Iraq invasion over his head, I would contend that he is possibly the most respected (former) politician / military leader in the US today (I met him once, in passing, at the Atlanta airport) and as such I view his support for Obama as potentially lethal for McCain, especially in swing states like Florida where there are large numbers of retired military (and still undecided) voters.

I'll be curious to see if his endorsement reflects in the polls over the coming days.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
On the contrary, he offered some excellent explanations

General Powell laid out the case pretty clearly. I would highly recommend seeing it all or at least reading the entire transcript. Here are a few highlights.

MR. BROKAW: General Powell, actually you gave a campaign contribution to Senator McCain. You have met twice at least with Barack Obama. Are you prepared to make a public declaration of which of these two candidates that you're prepared to support?

GEN. POWELL: Yes, but let me lead into it this way. I know both of these individuals very well now. I've known John for 25 years as your setup said. And I've gotten to know Mr. Obama quite well over the past two years. Both of them are distinguished Americans who are patriotic, who are dedicated to the welfare of our country. Either one of them, I think, would be a good president. I have said to Mr. McCain that I admire all he has done. I have some concerns about the direction that the party has taken in recent years. It has moved more to the right than I would like to see it, but that's a choice the party makes. And I've said to Mr. Obama, "You have to pass a test of do you have enough experience, and do you bring the judgment to the table that would give us confidence that you would be a good president."

And I've watched him over the past two years, frankly, and I've had this conversation with him. I have especially watched over the last six of seven weeks as both of them have really taken a final exam with respect to this economic crisis that we are in and coming out of the conventions. And I must say that I've gotten a good measure of both. In the case of Mr. McCain, I found that he was a little unsure as to deal with the economic problems that we were having and almost every day there was a different approach to the problem. And that concerned me, sensing that he didn't have a complete grasp of the economic problems that we had. And I was also concerned at the selection of Governor Palin. She's a very distinguished woman, and she's to be admired; but at the same time, now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don't believe she's ready to be president of the United States, which is the job of the vice president. And so that raised some question in my mind as to the judgment that Senator McCain made.

On the Obama side, I watched Mr. Obama and I watched him during this seven-week period. And he displayed a steadiness, an intellectual curiosity, a depth of knowledge and an approach to looking at problems like this and picking a vice president that, I think, is ready to be president on day one. And also, in not just jumping in and changing every day, but showing intellectual vigor. I think that he has a, a definitive way of doing business that would serve us well. I also believe that on the Republican side over the last seven weeks, the approach of the Republican Party and Mr. McCain has become narrower and narrower. Mr. Obama, at the same time, has given us a more inclusive, broader reach into the needs and aspirations of our people. He's crossing lines--ethnic lines, racial lines, generational lines. He's thinking about all villages have values, all towns have values, not just small towns have values.

And I've also been disappointed, frankly, by some of the approaches that Senator McCain has taken recently, or his campaign ads, on issues that are not really central to the problems that the American people are worried about. This Bill Ayers situation that's been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign. But Mr. McCain says that he's a washed-out terrorist. Well, then, why do we keep talking about him? And why do we have these robocalls going on around the country trying to suggest that, because of this very, very limited relationship that Senator Obama has had with Mr. Ayers, somehow, Mr. Obama is tainted. What they're trying to connect him to is some kind of terrorist feelings. And I think that's inappropriate.

Now, I understand what politics is all about. I know how you can go after one another, and that's good. But I think this goes too far. And I think it has made the McCain campaign look a little narrow. It's not what the American people are looking for. And I look at these kinds of approaches to the campaign and they trouble me. And the party has moved even further to the right, and Governor Palin has indicated a further rightward shift. I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration. I'm also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, "He's a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists." This is not the way we should be doing it in America.

I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine. It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son's grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards--Purple Heart, Bronze Star--showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn't have a Christian cross, it didn't have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and he gave his life. Now, we have got to stop polarizing ourself in this way. And John McCain is as nondiscriminatory as anyone I know. But I'm troubled about the fact that, within the party, we have these kinds of expressions.

So, when I look at all of this and I think back to my Army career, we've got two individuals, either one of them could be a good president. But which is the president that we need now? Which is the individual that serves the needs of the nation for the next period of time? And I come to the conclusion that because of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities--and we have to take that into account--as well as his substance--he has both style and substance--he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president. I think he is a transformational figure. He is a new generation coming into the world--onto the world stage, onto the American stage, and for that reason I'll be voting for Senator Barack Obama.

You can read the entire interview at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27266223/
 
The truth is, Powell should be running for president, but he clearly has too much class, intellect and integrity. He is right though, Obama is the man for this job. And McCain needs give a rest to all the terrorist smears. It's beyond pathetic.
 
Glaucus said:
The truth is, Powell should be running for president, but he clearly has too much class, intellect and integrity. He is right though, Obama is the man for this job. And McCain needs give a rest to all the terrorist smears. It's beyond pathetic.

I will agree with you that Powell should be running for President. I would easily have supported him.

Regards,
Ltstanfo
 
ltstanfo said:
Glaucus said:
The truth is, Powell should be running for president, but he clearly has too much class, intellect and integrity. He is right though, Obama is the man for this job. And McCain needs give a rest to all the terrorist smears. It's beyond pathetic.

I will agree with you that Powell should be running for President. I would easily have supported him.

I had a lot of respect for him until his transparent lying to the UN. I haven't been able to take him seriously since.
 
Glaucus said:
And McCain needs give a rest to all the terrorist smears. It's beyond pathetic.

Obama IS friends with a terrorist, even Obama does not deny this.
 
redrumloa said:
Glaucus said:
And McCain needs give a rest to all the terrorist smears. It's beyond pathetic.

Obama IS friends with a terrorist, even Obama does not deny this.

“Just a guy who lives in the neighborhood…”

" A Kind and Just Parent: The Children of Juvenile Court"
Beacon Press; 1 edition (June 1, 1998)

Barack Obama’s blurbed and reviewed William Ayers' book in the Chicago Tribune, December 21, 1997

On page 82 of the book, Ayers mentions Obama.

"Our neighbors include Muhammad Ali, former mayor Eugene Sawyer, poets Gwendolyn Brooks and Elizabeth Alexander, and writer Barack Obama. Minister Louis Farrakhan lives a block from our home and adds, we think a unique dimension to the idea of "safe neighborhood watch": the Fruit of Islam, his security force has an eye on things twenty-four-hours a day."

It’s a beautiful day in this neighborhood,
A beautiful day for a neighbor,
Would you be mine? Could you be mine?
 
redrumloa said:
Obama IS friends with a terrorist, even Obama does not deny this.
Ayres was a really bad terrorist his attacks/bombs didn't kill anyone.

Though we should not forget by today's standards...George Washington was a terrorist.

McCain is close to G Gordon Liddy. So McCain IS friends with a terrorist too. Liddy went to jail but for the Watergate break in. He was involved in kidnappings, assainations, and fire bombings. Liddy encouraged people to shoot and kill law officers of the ATF. Liddy likely had a larger negative impact to society then Ayers did.

So in my book they both have terrorists on their side.


I agree Powell should be running for President. However, I think Powell killed his career at the UN by bearing false witness.
 
I'll go one better than that

For the better part of a couple of decades the Republican party (and some Democrats too - they are not free of blame for this) have coddled a lot of terrorists living right here in the United States. For some people the fact that these Cuban exiles have directed much of their terrorist acts toward Castro and Cuba somehow makes it ok. Ever heard of Orlando Bosch? Or Luis Posada Carriles? Or Eduardo Arocena? Between them all these guys were responsible for all sorts of terrorist acts. Here's a decent article that summarizes them - http://www.slate.com/id/2202183/pagenum/all/

As a result, McCain's campaign and advisers find themselves allied with and/or supporting militants who have committed acts that any reasonable observer would define as terrorism. On July 20, while campaigning for McCain in Miami and just prior to speaking at a McCain event, Sen. Joe Lieberman met with the wife of convicted serial bomber Eduardo Arocena and promised to pursue a presidential pardon on his behalf. Arocena is the founder of the notorious Cuban exile militant group Omega 7, renowned for a string of bombings from 1975 to 1983. Arocena was convicted of the 1980 murder of a Cuban diplomat in Manhattan. In 1983, Arocena was arrested and charged with 42 counts pertaining to conspiracy, explosives, firearms, and destruction of foreign government property within the United States. He is currently serving a life sentence in federal prison in Indiana. His targets included:

*
Madison Square Garden (he blew up an adjacent store);
*
JFK airport (Arocena's group planted a suitcase bomb intended for a TWA flight to Los Angeles—in protest of the airline's flights to Cuba. The plane would have exploded if not for the fact that the bomb went off on the tarmac prior to being loaded);
*
Avery Fisher Hall at Lincoln Center (causing damage to three levels of the theater and halting the performance of a music group from Cuba);
*
the ticket office of the Soviet airline Aeroflot;
*
and a church.

He also attempted to assassinate the Cuban ambassador to the United Nations.

Nor has McCain's senior adviser Diaz-Balart ever wavered in seeking "due process" for legendary bombers and would-be Castro assassins Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch. Both were charged with the bombing of a Cuban airliner in 1976, killing all 73 civilian passengers—the first act of airline terrorism in the Americas. In 2005, when I asked him about those who died—many of them teenage athletes—Bosch responded, "We were at war with Castro, and in war, everything is valid."

These guys have a lot of politicians - almost entirely Republicans, with a few exceptions like Lieberman, as far as I can tell* - who have acted on their behalf for years. The Republicans in particular have cultivated some of the most extreme ultra-conservative parts of the Cuban exile community in exchange for their political support. McCain's campaign is no different.

*Whether or not Lieberman can really be considered a Democrat anymore is debatable.
 
redrumloa said:
Glaucus said:
And McCain needs give a rest to all the terrorist smears. It's beyond pathetic.

Obama IS friends with a terrorist, even Obama does not deny this.
We should be clear that Obama was not associated with Ayers in any way during the time when Ayers actively conducted terror attacks (with a zero body count). He didn't meet with Ayers until after Ayers had turned himself in to authorities and served his time. He's now a legally free man. He has also publicly apologized for his prior actions and has shown remorse. I think few people consider Ayers a real threat to the US today. Regardless, Obama was a teenager when Ayers was a terrorist and the relationship between Obama and Ayers wasn't that close to begin with. He's more of an associate then a friend, someone he happened to work alongside at a charity organization. So what if Ayers contributed cash to Obama, so have thousands of others, does that mean they are all best friends with Obama now?

It is my opinion that the McCain camp is conducting a two pronged attack against Obama. 1) They keep trying to paint him as a Muslim. Not directly, but his supporters like Rush Limbaugh (and average guys like our dear friend metalman) keep those flames blowing by reminding us all that his middle name is Hussein. 2) His links to so-call "terrorists". And although they don't really want to link the two together publicly, there is an implicit connection there that Obama may be soft on al-Qaeda because deed down inside he's one of "them". And as silly as it may seem, I think it may actually be working.

- Mike
 
faethor said:
McCain is close to G Gordon Liddy. So McCain IS friends with a terrorist too. Liddy went to jail but for the Watergate break in. He was involved in kidnappings, assainations, and fire bombings. Liddy encouraged people to shoot and kill law officers of the ATF. Liddy likely had a larger negative impact to society then Ayers did.
Thanks Faethor, I was not aware of that connection. Looked it up on wikipedia. Interesting read: George Gordon Battle Liddy

Liddy's connections to John McCain

In 1998 Liddy hosted a fundraiser at his house for John McCain's re-election campaign at which guests could have their pictures taken with McCain and Liddy.[6] Over the years, Liddy, who has referred to McCain as "an old friend," has made at least four contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator's campaigns -- including $1,000 in 2008. When David Letterman asked McCain about his relationship with Liddy, McCain said, "I know Gordon Liddy. He paid his debt. He went to prison and paid his debt, as people do. I'm not in any way embarrassed to know Gordon Liddy."

- Mike
 
Regardless, Obama was a teenager when Ayers was a terrorist and the relationship between Obama and Ayers wasn't that close to begin with.
I thought Obama was 8 years old - but your point is the same.

anyway, Mccain is friends with bush annd I consider HIM a terrorist
 
btw, great response by Powell. Well thought out. It's hard not to agree with it
 
Glaucus said:
We should be clear that Obama was not associated with Ayers in any way during the time when Ayers actively conducted terror attacks (with a zero body count). He didn't meet with Ayers until after Ayers had turned himself in to authorities and served his time. He's now a legally free man. He has also publicly apologized for his prior actions and has shown remorse. I think few people consider Ayers a real threat to the US today. Regardless, Obama was a teenager when Ayers was a terrorist and the relationship between Obama and Ayers wasn't that close to begin with. He's more of an associate then a friend, someone he happened to work alongside at a charity organization. So what if Ayers contributed cash to Obama, so have thousands of others, does that mean they are all best friends with Obama now?

- Mike

The unrepentant terrorist Ayers summed up the Weatherman's ideology as follows: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."

''I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.''

Ayers then girlfriend Diana Oughton and three other Weather Underground members died when a nail bomb they were building prematurely detonated. Ayers was the bomb designer. It was intended to be detonated in a Ft Dix Dance Hall.

Charges against Ayres were dismissed because of prosecutorial misconduct (an Illegal wiretap).

Obama and Ayres served together on two boards "The Woods Fund" and the "Chicago Annenberg Challenge". Ayers and Obama together funneled CAC money to groups like ACORN and the Developing Communities Project, groups working in the radical tradition of Saul Alinsky.

Obama’s 1995 political coming-out party was at the home of Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn, the former co-leader of the Weather Underground.

Ayers and Dohrn have never been quiet about their time as a Weather underground revolutionaries. Ayres wrote a book about it in 2001. Chicago Magazine did a lengthy profile of him complete with pictures of Ayers standing on an American flag thrown on the ground.

Ayres has been Obama's mentor.
 
Let's talk about "unrepentant"

let's say that a Presidential candidate had a friend. Let's say that friend was a convicted criminal - a guy who had served prison time for several felonies, and had his sentence cut short when it was commuted by the President. Let's say that this particular felon was completely unrepentant about the things he did, and in fact flaunted them, even boasted about them, and then used his notoriety to create a second career for himself on talk radio. Let's say that over time, he admitted doing all sorts of other things, like planning to burn down the offices of political opponents, even planning the murders of people who he felt were his political enemies. Let's say this guy also continued to flaunt the law, such as talking on air about how he still owned a lot of firearms, even though it was probably illegal for him to do so. He talked about how he named his paper targets after the President and First Lady. He gave explicit instructions on how to make sure you kill a law enforcement officer by shooting them NOT in the chest, where they likely have a bulletproof vest on, but in the head.

Well, guess what? In case you hadn't guessed already, none of this is theoretical. I just described Gordon Liddy, a friend of John McCain.

Now, I am not sure how you are interpreting "unrepentant" as far as Ayers goes, but I seem to remember reading a letter to the editor published in the Chicago Tribune a few weeks after the September 11th attack in which he broadly condemned all terrorism and specifically condemned the September 11th attacks. Did you read that letter and come away with a completely different interpretaation than me, or are you just repeating the condemnations of Ayers that you have heard on Fox News and such?
 
redrumloa said:
Glaucus said:
And McCain needs give a rest to all the terrorist smears. It's beyond pathetic.

Obama IS friends with a terrorist, even Obama does not deny this.

Well, I'm sure that he's met Bush and Cheney but I don't think that he's "friends".
 
metalman said:
"Idon't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.''
Appearantly most of your assertions are true. The conclusion on the other hand.

Ayres has been Obama's mentor.
However little to nothing about the statements show this is true. Serving on a board shows a relationship on this issue. It doesn't show mentorship. It doesn't show that Obama supported Ayers days during his failed attempts at terrorism. In fact Obama has come out against this time. What Obama working with Republicans on a board and funded by Republicans to improve education shows is that Obama is concerned about poor education and has seeken to improve education by working bilaterally.

Chicago Annenberg Challenge -- Funded by Republican Annenberg. Annenberg was an ambassador under Nixon and a close friend of Reagan. The Republican Gov of Illinois, Jim Edgar, requested the funds for Chicago schools and for Ayers. The board was a mix of backgrounds both Democratic and Republican cooperation existed. It seems Republicans liked this Terrorist enough to fund him with $100M. So if we want to ding Obama for his association in a Republican funded terrorist led organization.. OK.
:wink:
 
Re: Let's talk about "unrepentant"

eleventhma said:
let's say that a Presidential candidate had a friend. Let's say that friend was a convicted criminal - a guy who had served prison time for several felonies, and had his sentence cut short when it was commuted by the President. Let's say that this particular felon was completely unrepentant about the things he did, and in fact flaunted them, even boasted about them, and then used his notoriety to create a second career for himself on talk radio. Let's say that over time, he admitted doing all sorts of other things, like planning to burn down the offices of political opponents, even planning the murders of people who he felt were his political enemies. Let's say this guy also continued to flaunt the law, such as talking on air about how he still owned a lot of firearms, even though it was probably illegal for him to do so. He talked about how he named his paper targets after the President and First Lady. He gave explicit instructions on how to make sure you kill a law enforcement officer by shooting them NOT in the chest, where they likely have a bulletproof vest on, but in the head.

Well, guess what? In case you hadn't guessed already, none of this is theoretical. I just described Gordon Liddy, a friend of John McCain.

Now, I am not sure how you are interpreting "unrepentant" as far as Ayers goes, but I seem to remember reading a letter to the editor published in the Chicago Tribune a few weeks after the September 11th attack in which he broadly condemned all terrorism and specifically condemned the September 11th attacks. Did you read that letter and come away with a completely different interpretaation than me, or are you just repeating the condemnations of Ayers that you have heard on Fox News and such?
how dare you come here and be rational!!

:D
 
Back
Top