- Joined
- Mar 30, 2011
- Messages
- 234
- Reaction score
- 11
I did not want to highjack from another thread that was talking about pay per mile.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42919365/ns ... cy-threat/
In the US, The DOT are studies Pay-Per-Mile idea as well.
I do have a mix point of view. If they get rid of the gas tax and created a pay per mile. I hope they will add a the weight/mile twist seems to take all main contributing factors into account.They need to use "pound-miles". Heavier vehicles use more gas and of course, damage roads more. They need to tax on a pound-mile rather than just mile. Also, driving during winter can be costlier due to surface clearning and salt damage. So, a new unit of "weather-pound-miles" travelled would not only track the vehicle weight but also weight impacts during inclement weather. Studded snow tires, worse damage, so take that into account too. I suppose you could leave it to the taxpayer to indicate percentages traveled in each state. Even though it would be imperfect, I hate the idea of GPS tracking our every move (even though cell phones and laptops apparently already do that quite well). I am already frisked and x-rayed at the airport like a prisoner moving between cell block in a prison, I don't need or want a tracking collar on top of that. It a matter of time that cars may runs on with a mix of electric, gas, CNG, hydrogen (?) propelling our vehicles in the years to come, miles traveled seems the only equitable way to do it. If the dot going to do by pay per mile then I know I would be looking for ways to reduce my mileage the same as I do to reduce gas MPG.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42919365/ns ... cy-threat/
In the US, The DOT are studies Pay-Per-Mile idea as well.
I do have a mix point of view. If they get rid of the gas tax and created a pay per mile. I hope they will add a the weight/mile twist seems to take all main contributing factors into account.They need to use "pound-miles". Heavier vehicles use more gas and of course, damage roads more. They need to tax on a pound-mile rather than just mile. Also, driving during winter can be costlier due to surface clearning and salt damage. So, a new unit of "weather-pound-miles" travelled would not only track the vehicle weight but also weight impacts during inclement weather. Studded snow tires, worse damage, so take that into account too. I suppose you could leave it to the taxpayer to indicate percentages traveled in each state. Even though it would be imperfect, I hate the idea of GPS tracking our every move (even though cell phones and laptops apparently already do that quite well). I am already frisked and x-rayed at the airport like a prisoner moving between cell block in a prison, I don't need or want a tracking collar on top of that. It a matter of time that cars may runs on with a mix of electric, gas, CNG, hydrogen (?) propelling our vehicles in the years to come, miles traveled seems the only equitable way to do it. If the dot going to do by pay per mile then I know I would be looking for ways to reduce my mileage the same as I do to reduce gas MPG.