Dumbest Professor in the World Explains Why Mohammed Filmmaker Should Go To Jail

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
14,974
Reaction score
2,156
Would be hilarious if not so sad. And y'all wonder why the right shakes their heads about what our leftist universities are churning out.




If there’s anything that nullifies the argument for a college education, it would be the fact that Anthea Butler, despite having fewer brain cells than most lab monkeys and no ability to detect when she is contradicting herself in the same sentence, is a college professor at UPenn.
My initial tweet about Bacile, the person said to be responsible for the film mocking the prophet Mohammed, was not because I am against the First Amendment.
Clearly not. Suggesting that people go to jail for their speech is what supporters of the First Amendment usually do.
If there is anyone who values free speech, it is a tenured professor!
Tenured professors value their speech, not the free speech of people who disagree with them, which is what her entire response proves.
So why did I tweet that Bacile should be in jail? The “free speech” in Bacile’s film is not about expressing a personal opinion about Islam. It denigrates the religion by depicting the faith’s founder in several ludicrous and historically inaccurate scenes to incite and inflame viewers.
So which part of that isn’t a personal opinion?
Is Anthea Butler saying that personal opinions become illegal when in the opinion of an Associate Prof at UPenn they are “historically inaccurate”. Or is she saying that inflammatory personal opinions can be illegal?
 
Or is she saying that inflammatory personal opinions can be illegal?

Now that is a good question. If you're a person in a position of power and you week in week out make the case that someone should be killed, and one of your readers/listeners/followers takes you up on it, where exactly does your personal responsibility lay in the resulting murder?

One might recall the case of Bill O'Reilly's calls for an abortion doctor to be executed, and after months of him saying this Dr should be killed, guess what...

One can support free speech and at the same time expect that people be held accountable for the results of that speech. There is no contradiction in these two views.
 
that is a horribly written article.
If there’s anything that nullifies the argument for a college education
really? THAT is all this guy needs to hate education?? Wow, sad, just sad. Obviously he has no education and knows no one With an education. I do. And having an education is way better than not having one. Better for one quality of life, better for dealing with the ups and downs of survival, better for one's enjoyment.....etc.

plus, who bases their entire thesis on a stupid tweet ?
ALL tweets are moronic. :rolleyes:


the only purpose of this lame article is to slam one person and NOT to discus the very important purpose of the First Amendment.


"satire is protected speech - even when the person being satirized doesn't get it" - Al Franken
 
Free Speech does not protect incitement and that is a fairly long standing and accepted legal principle. It's like the old "You can't yell fire in a crowded theatre" thing. If it's likely to cause trouble then you have a responsibility not to do it. If you actually use your speech to make trouble then you are definitely running afoul of the law and here is where I think the professor is wrong - this "movie" was created to incite a violent reaction.

Of course, there is a very simple reason Bacile should go to jail. He's a crook and a serial offender - but he turned informant for the FBI. Who knows, he may still be working for them - trying to flush out "extremists" and provoke violence.
 
Wow, so much opinion before I could even form one myself!
Perhaps you should show some respect to your readers and come up with her original speech, and THEN you point out where you disagree with her?
DING DING DING!!!!

by the way, I just saw an interview with this woman (the professor) so if it isn't on line yet i'll bet it shows up soon. (and too lazy to look it up now) :D
 
gawd, i wish society would just let ya'll say nigger when that's what you mean.... :confused:

It is clear who the racists are on Whyzzat, very clear. You only have to see who uses what language. You and other "liberals" drop the N-word at every possible occasion. Get with the 21st century you knuckle-dragger!:mad:
 
It is clear who the racists are on Whyzzat, very clear. You only have to see who uses what language. You and other "liberals" drop the N-word at every possible occasion. Get with the 21st century you knuckle-dragger!:mad:

lmao... :lol:
 
good luck sellin that red....

Victoria, Kansas Census Data

RACE

One Race Percent in Victoria, KS
At the time of the last census survey, the number of people of one race in Victoria, KS was 1,202.

White Population in Victoria, KS
The estimated White population in the Victoria community is 1,202, which is 99.5 percent of the total population (The U.S. average is 75.10%).

Black Population in Victoria, Kansas
The estimated Black/African American population is 0, which is 0 percent of the total population in town (The U.S. average is 12.30%).

American Indian and Alaska Native Population in Victoria, KS
In 2000, the number of American Indians or Alaska Natives in Victoria, KS was 0.

Asian Population in Victoria, Kansas
At the last survey, the total Asian population in the community was 0.

Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander Population in Victoria, KS
The number of Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders living in Victoria was an estimated 0.

Other/Multiple Races
The number of residents identified as “some other race” was 0, while those of “two or more races” was 6 at the time of the last census.

Hispanic Population
The Hispanic population in the Victoria community was 10, or 0.8 percent of the total population (compared to the national average of 12.50% percent).
 
Back
Top