Egg on the face of AGW scammers

[redrumloa]

This scam keeps getting uglier by the minute. As you have probably seen, the IPCC finally admits Himalayan glacier melt figures were fake.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/newdelhi/ ... 99098.aspx

The IPCC claim that glaciers will vanish by 2035 was not based on iota of scientific evidence. IPCC has to do a lot of answering on how it reached the 2035 figure, which created such a scare.

Doh!

Most studies on the glaciers are from the West. Why?

It is true. Our scientific input on glaciology has eroded in recent years. It is for the second time, western studies have been proven wrong. In 1990, US Environment Protection Agency reported that 39 million tonnes of methane emitted each year was from wet paddy cultivation (mostly from India). We then found that it was actually 2 to 6 million tonnes. It emphasises that we need to improve our scientific capabilities on climate science.

Double doh!!!

Does it get any worse than this?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/james ... -glaciers/

So, to recap: in the course of a garbled phone conversation a scientist accidentally invents a problem that doesn’t exist. This gets reported as if gospel in an influential Warmist science magazine and repeated by a Warmist NGO, before being lent the full authority of the IPCC’s fourth assessment report which, as we know, can’t be wrong because it is vetted by around 2,500 scientists. Then, on the back of this untrue story, the scientist gets a cushy job at the institution whose director is also in charge of the IPCC.

Nice work if you can invent it, eh?

Yup, the sh*t is getting deep in this hoax.