- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Messages
- 7,710
- Reaction score
- 2,587
I have to confess to enjoying this thread on fake blue tick brands but I've a feeling the advertisers might be a wee bit uppity about this kind of thing. Especially Chiquita Bananas.
Gotta admire the old lefty culture jamming. This should be technically solvable though but ultimately any solution that doesn't reduce advertiser power (or get rid of advertisers) is not going to result in a free speech platform. Advertiser control is a primary problem with social and traditional media these days.I have to confess to enjoying this thread on fake blue tick brands but I've a feeling the advertisers might be a wee bit uppity about this kind of thing. Especially Chiquita Bananas.
Indeed. There was never anyway I could see for Musk to achieve his twin goals of free speech and profitability. How someone like him managed to miss that is a little perplexing, without invoking the "powerful dude surrounded by sycophantic yes-men" clause.any solution that doesn't reduce advertiser power (or get rid of advertisers) is not going to result in a free speech platform.
the entire thread is genius.I have to confess to enjoying this thread on fake blue tick brands but I've a feeling the advertisers might be a wee bit uppity about this kind of thing. Especially Chiquita Bananas.
The algorithm and reporting system remain garbage. The most egregious part of the system, though, is the bit where you can appeal, it probably doesn't get seen by a human (and if it does then it will likely get seen by a human who has been trained to see everything as racist,sexist,homo & transphobic all at once) and then you must delete the tweet to regain access BUT the act of deleting the tweet means that you are admitting that your tweet broke the rules (that is explicitly stated by twitter right before the delete button) so if you feel you have been falsely flagged or your tweet has been misconstrued and that you have not actually violated the terms you must, in effect, sign a false confession to get back on. If this fellow is still tweeting then know that he has admitted that his tweet broke the terms of service."DELETE TWEET" @FluffyMcDeath this reminded me of you saying you were asked to delete an innocuous Tweet.
Whether he actually believes it or not, yes, he's effectively admitted that in order to post. As could you if your circumstances were such that your desire to use the platform outweighed your distaste for such an "admission of guilt". Mileage here will vary depending on the person and context. From the Twitter perspective I suppose it was implemented as a controlling mechanism of sorts, and I can sort of see the logic in it, up to a point. OTOH, I doubt it's particularly effective at influencing behaviour. Some people don't care enough about Twitter to cave in to such coercion, as appears to be your position. Of those that do cave in and delete the Tweet, how many actually agree with the charge? And how many actually change their behaviour in ways Twitter wants, whatever those ways may be?he has admitted that his tweet broke the terms of service.
Who is "we"?I have no idea if this is really true but the ensuing tweets make thIs all very FUNNY/SAD
Like a lot of social media users with absurd amounts of followers, this lad seems to have a somewhat inflated sense of self importance.Who is "we"?
Seems it's also gone from "everyone must come into the office" to "no one is allowed into the office" overnight.
elon always thinks he is funny.Still, at least he sees the funny side.