I did, indeed, read the entire article. I have to question if you did. Most of it is such a parody, that I had to double check to make sure I didn't somehow end up on the Onion.
I did read everything and did not notice anything truly controversial being mentioned.
So you agree with their opinion that the same immigrants that help manufacturing in the US, hurt Mexico when they go back...?
The article does not reference the effects of immigration on the US.
I do know it is more nuanced than that. And certainly there are immigrants that do grow the US economy. And, being the US, we do have a tradition and history of immigration far different from Mexico's that needs to be considered... But you gotta admire the sheer level of ridiculousness in stating that the US is fine by gaining an estimated 200,000-300,000 Mexicans a year, but a one time send back of small fraction of that will devistate Mexico's economy.
But the article
does not state that at all.
You are totally projecting.
Once again, the article does not discuss whether immigration is good or bad for the United States. Furthermore, the article does
not state that deportations from the US will devastate the Mexican economy. It does mention that some economists expect salaries to fall in certain blue-collar professions but it also says: "At the same time, though, there will be more English-speaking Mexicans entering the workforce who’ve honed their skills in the United States,
a development that in the long run could position Mexico to be a stronger player in the global economy, analysts say."
Also: "'We suffered a cost as a nation by sending those hard workers to the U.S., in the sense that we lost a lot of talent,' de la Calle said. 'When they come back to Mexico and they are properly trained, they will make more than a proportional contribution to Mexico.'"
Does this sound like the Mexican economy is going to implode due to deportations from the US to Mexico? No, it does not. The article references potential short- and long-term effects. Some good, some bad. It seems pretty even-handed to me.
Also, I do not know the latest numbers but between 2009 and 2014, the net immigration between the US and Mexico was negative, i.e. more people went back to Mexico than moved to the US.
I do get that you disagree that immigration from Mexico is beneficial for the US and that you are sick and tired of reading articles that express this view. I have no issue with that. What I do not understand is why this particular article is "offensive" in any way or why you would possibly expect every article in the same publication to express the exact same "consistent" points of views even when they are written by entirely different authors.
