- Joined
- Apr 2, 2005
- Messages
- 14,970
- Reaction score
- 2,154
redrumloa said:I usually scoff at celebrities involved in such things, like Obama using James Cameron as an advisor on the oil leak,
FluffyMcDeath said:redrumloa said:I usually scoff at celebrities involved in such things, like Obama using James Cameron as an advisor on the oil leak,
Cameron was consulting on deep water work, a thing that he has a lot of experience with.
redrumloa said:FluffyMcDeath said:redrumloa said:I usually scoff at celebrities involved in such things, like Obama using James Cameron as an advisor on the oil leak,
Cameron was consulting on deep water work, a thing that he has a lot of experience with.
He's a director.
redrumloa said:
In his congressional testimony, Costner recounted his struggle to effectively market the centrifuge. He explained that although the machines are quite effective, they can still leave trace amounts of oil in the treated water that exceeds current environmental regulations.
TMT officials said the company does not yet have US government approval to assist in the cleanup. Because the process wouldn't remove all traces of oil from the seawater, TMT will likely have to gain a special permit from the EPA. TMT also is working with the Coast Guard to gain approval to operate in the gulf, which may require a waiver from the Jones act a 90-year-old maritime act that restricts foreign-flagged vessels from operating in U.S. waters
metalman said:Requiring water to be 99.985% pure to be discharged by oil skimmers is Obama EPA stupidity.
Costner's is not the only skimmer being blocked from clean up by the EPA & Coast Guard
FluffyMcDeath said:The article suggests that the relevant authorities are currently looking at this vessel and working on a waiver that will permit it to work in the gulf. The article also mentions (though extremely briefly) one other stumbling block. The vessel has no contract yet with BP.
And Ronald Reagan was an actor, and a pretty bad one too.redrumloa said:FluffyMcDeath said:redrumloa said:I usually scoff at celebrities involved in such things, like Obama using James Cameron as an advisor on the oil leak,
Cameron was consulting on deep water work, a thing that he has a lot of experience with.
He's a director.
Why does neither the U.S. government nor U.S. energy companies have on hand the cleanup technology available in Europe? Ironically, the superior European technology runs afoul of U.S. environmental rules. The voracious Dutch vessels, for example, continuously suck up vast quantities of oily water, extract most of the oil and then spit overboard vast quantities of nearly oil-free water. Nearly oil-free isn't good enough for the U.S. regulators, who have a standard of 15 parts per million -- if water isn't at least 99.9985% pure, it may not be returned to the Gulf of Mexico.
When ships in U.S. waters take in oil-contaminated water, they are forced to store it. As U.S. Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen explained in a press briefing on June 11, "We have skimmed, to date, about 18 million gallons of oily water--the oil has to be decanted from that [and] our yield is usually somewhere around 10% or 15% on that." In other words, U.S. skimmer ships have mostly been removing water from the Gulf
Another clear demonstration of the Bush Socialist agenda. He forced companies to not operate in a free market when disaster struck. I will call him Pinko and he'll be my own banana dictator..metalman said:Bush suspend EPA regulations in the aftermath of Katrina, to allow the use of available fuel supplies from refineries, even if it was not the correct EPA mandated blend required for the area. This stopped severe price gouging on the Atlantic seaboard from major fuel pipeline & refinery disruptions.