Names of government agents who masterminded Rawesome Foods raid

[redrumloa]

NaturalNews publishes names of government agents who masterminded Rawesome Foods raid

The Rawesome Foods raid that took place August 3, 2011, is being publicly described by many as an act of "government terrorism" against innocents. And yet there has been very little information published about the names of the government instigators who masterminded these armed raids and oversaw the pillaging of Rawesome Foods and the destruction of tens of thousands of dollars worth of food.

Today, NaturalNews is publishing the names of five government agents who masterminded this raid and / or took part in the raid. This is all part of a campaign to protest these acts of government tyranny by sending emails, making phone calls, sending letters and otherwise making it very clear to these agents that We the People will not tolerate this kind of treatment.

 

[faethor]

The question here again is what harm is acceptable or not to society.

The article advocates raw milk for infants. It's been established through illnesses and hospitalization of the more sensitive people in our society (infants, elderly, weakened immunes) that Raw Goats Milk can cause bacteria infections and other problems. The raw goat's milk advocates claim pasteurization causes the proteins and fats to change and this form too will cause harm. Raw is proven harm. Pasteurized is unproven. But, let's accept the anti-pasteurization fans are correct. Then both cause harm and the response shouldn't be to legallized but to make all forms illegal.

People are advocating writing hate letters to the enforcers. I see this as an ineffective response. They'll most likely toss them out. Do you think the police will stop if they get hate letters? Nah. The effect will be to not get the message to the people who really need to know this, the elected Local, State, and Federal representation in government.

In short - the policy advocating position is wrong and the message is getting to a level that can't impact change so is very ineffective.

 

[Dammy]

The question here again is what harm is acceptable or not to society.

The article advocates raw milk for infants. It's been established through illnesses and hospitalization of the more sensitive people in our society (infants, elderly, weakened immunes) that Raw Goats Milk can cause bacteria infections and other problems. The raw goat's milk advocates claim pasteurization causes the proteins and fats to change and this form too will cause harm. Raw is proven harm. Pasteurized is unproven. But, let's accept the anti-pasteurization fans are correct. Then both cause harm and the response shouldn't be to legallized but to make all forms illegal.

People are advocating writing hate letters to the enforcers. I see this as an ineffective response. They'll most likely toss them out. Do you think the police will stop if they get hate letters? Nah. The effect will be to not get the message to the people who really need to know this, the elected Local, State, and Federal representation in government.

In short - the policy advocating position is wrong and the message is getting to a level that can't impact change so is very ineffective.

The point is that it should be the individual that determines what is best, not the government. I'm also fully open to legalization of all drugs. It's not the government's role nor responsibility to tell people what they may or may not do to their own bodies as long as it does not effect other humans or property. If you want to argue that it may harm infants, that's fine and take it up with the individual family and not the company distributing a natural product.

 

[redrumloa]

The question here again is what harm is acceptable or not to society.

I think it is more a question of personal freedoms. I don't know if I would personally drink raw milk, but someone else doing it does not harm me. Humans drank raw milk for centuries, if not millenniums.

Even throwing this out, the bigger problem here is the method they are enforcing the law. Federal and local law enforcement did swat style raids, jailed the people operating the private club, took $12,000 in cash and destroyed not just the raw milk and raw cheese but an entire inventory of organic fruit and vegetables. Is this was just about raw dairy products why not issue a citation or take legal action? Why treat club members and in other instances Amish farmers like hardened terrorists? Why destroy non related inventory? Why confiscate cash? Why put a gag order on the people you arrested? There is more going on here than just raw milk, which is apparently legal in California anyhow. Read up on S510 to see what this is really about.