NASA's Curiosity sinks Mars water theory?

Robert

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
10,801
Reaction score
6,528
Data from NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars has left scientists scratching their heads. On the one hand, the bot appears to have found evidence that water once flowed on Mars, but on the other hand, the readings suggest there couldn't have been.

The problem stems from carbon dioxide, or rather the lack of it. Curiosity has been trundling across the unforgiving dust world for nearly five years now, and so far it has found no carbonates. This potentially blows a hole in boffins' theories about the Martian atmosphere.

Current thinking is that about 3.8 billion years ago, Mars had running water on the surface. The Sun back then wasn't strong enough to warm the Martian surface to a temperature that would cause liquid water to form, so scientists postulated that there was enough carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to heat the surface using a greenhouse effect.

If that was the case, Martian rocks should be studded with carbonate material. Instead, Curiosity hasn't found any evidence of this after drilling into what is thought to be the bed of what was once a giant lake in the Gale Crater, according to new research to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.
 
More on this from Ars:
A team of researchers has created a new estimate of Mars' ancient carbon levels using data collected by the Curiosity rover. They've also concluded that there was nowhere near enough CO2to warm the planet to the point where water on the surface would remain liquid.

The researchers conclude that the Martian atmosphere at the time the clays were formed had a lot more CO2 than the lower limits of previous estimates. But the numbers are still fall far short of what's needed to keep the temperature above freezing.

This doesn't definitively rule out the greenhouse explanation; certain environmental processes the researchers are not considering could have changed the composition of the clays. Where does that leave things? It's largely the same predicament as before. This study adds more evidence that Mars didn’t have enough CO2 in its atmosphere to have kept water liquid from 3.8 to 3.1 billion years ago. So either warming was driven by some other mechanism, or somehow the water was able to flow despite temperatures that were typically below. Either conclusion would be interesting.
 
up035513.jpg
 
Back
Top