Newest pop-culture icon

metalman

metalman

Active Member
Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
10,232
Reaction score
3,006
images



Next months cover
 
Pretty groovy looking for a murdering nutcase.

Even Auld Chico Manson, who cut quite a dash as murders go, wasn't quite that pretty:
charles-manson.jpg
 
That's Rolling Stone Magazine for you, the mouthpiece for the far left. I'm not terribly surprised they are sympathetic to the bomber and try to make him out to be some kind of pop superstar with an airbrushed photo on the cover.
 
Since Metalman and Redrumloa clearly didn't want to read the article and instead preferred to judge a book by the cover I decided to read and did read "The Making of a Monster" online. It was interesting and straight forward documenting events in his life that lead up to the bombing. It never blamed any particular event. It gave insight into a life that we have never lived.
 
faethor said:
Since Metalman and Redrumloa clearly didn't want to read the article and instead preferred to judge a book by the cover I decided to read and did read "The Making of a Monster" online. It was interesting and straight forward documenting events in his life that lead up to the bombing. It never blamed any particular event. It gave insight into a life that we have never lived.
Click to expand...

"How a popular, promising student was failed by his family"
 
Read the article. No blame is placed on anything or one. It lays out events and doesn't place blame. You won't find it's all Mom's fault as Freud might have us believe.
 
Well, some people have suggested this alternative cover:

BPfHQ__CMAELUls.jpg


Note the laser sight on his head. I kinda like that one better.
 
faethor said:
Read the article. No blame is placed on anything or one. It lays out events and doesn't place blame. You won't find it's all Mom's fault as Freud might have us believe.
Click to expand...

I'll read it when I get home. You trying to tell me the cover outright lied? I mean what I typed is exactly what the cover says word for word.
 
The title issues more blame than the article.
 
@Fluffy,

The fact that he made the cover isn't the controversy in and of itself (at least from what I've seen online). It's the photo that they chose.
 
faethor said:
Since Metalman and Redrumloa clearly didn't want to read the article and instead preferred to judge a book by the cover I decided to read and did read "The Making of a Monster" online. It was interesting and straight forward documenting events in his life that lead up to the bombing. It never blamed any particular event. It gave insight into a life that we have never lived.
Click to expand...

So why did they give him the Rock Star sepia cover?
its credited as "Illustration by Sean McCabe"
the cover of Rolling Stone, is essentially an place for manufacturing pop-culture icons.

and why did the story repeatedly use his nickname Jahar instead of his given name Dzhokhar?

Guess Tsarnaev plays really loud music…
Loud enough to blow your eardrums…
and some other body parts

hope he bought 5 copies for his mother
 
Robert said:
Pretty groovy looking for a murdering nutcase.

Even Auld Chico Manson, who cut quite a dash as murders go, wasn't quite that pretty:
Click to expand...



Ted Bundy was a serial killer, who also had the lady killer looks too
 
Glaucus said:
@Fluffy,

The fact that he made the cover isn't the controversy in and of itself (at least from what I've seen online). It's the photo that they chose.
Click to expand...

I’m worried that this cover creates unrealistic beauty standards for terrorists. This could cause many terrorists to develop eating disorders, cause them to waste money on beauty products, or even force them to alter their appearances by resorting to plastic surgery. I hope psychological counselling to terrorists suffering from beauty issues is available under ObamaCare.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top