I relish the irony of this statement. You want the government to let the elites continue to consolidate their wealth and power because when the government is gone and has been replaced by the elites and their money then everything will be OK? Once the plantations have got rid of the resistance organizers then they will give their slaves freedom?
I want everyone to be able to make bucket loads of money, not just the Soros' of the world.
Well, yes, hyper-inflation is a great equalizer, but is it really the tool you want to use? It will be much more painful.
I want big business to be responsible and go under if they are not[...]
Who is going to keep them responsible? I know a lot of people like to believe in this thing called "the market" but it doesn't really exist. The guys with the most money run the market - it doesn't work the way naive economists say it does any more because the mathematical assumptions underlying that belief were never truly justified and as the major players have become bigger the assumptions have been completely violated.
You see, for the elites like Soros, they need a strong centralized government to control the people.
But the elites don't care if that government is a nominally elected one (they don't like the ones that are freely elected by a knowledgeable electorate - too hard to control) or an unelected corporation. In fact many of them would prefer government by unelected corporation but the only disagreement is whose corporation it should be.
They just control that government via finances. If there is strong business and a decentralized government (read power to the individual states), Soros and company can not manipulate with complete control.
Soros, Soros, Soros. It's not just Soros, of course and when you say they manipulate the government by finance you are being too narrow. They control the government with MONEY. Money is how the Koch brothers got the governor of Wisconsin in, money is how the Koch brothers (and Soros and all the others) fund "independent" think tanks that write bills then they fund the lobbyists that encourage politicians to pass the bills and then they organize the funding that gets in politicians that passed the bills for them and get rid of the ones that don't play ball. And the more money the government lets them keep the more they are able to do this.
They fear the individual combining their power, [...]
Yes. They hate and fear unions. That is why they spend money putting anti-union stories in their newspapers and TV news, that is why they fund the election of anti-union politicians and that is why write anti-union laws for the politicians to rubber-stamp.
You keep thinking this is a zero sum gain, wealth creation is not a zero sum gain. Wealth creation is what protects little guys like me from the Soros' of the world. I don't need him, I don't need his money, I don't need his scraps if I can be apart of something not connected with him to make wealth. Government, OTOH, is the throttle and today, can pick and chose who they want to succeed or lose.
The wealth you make, you make for Soros. The wealth you make will be the wealth you make for whoever employs you. You do need money or something that works like it - and you will need whatever kind of money is currency where you live and if that happens to be Starbucks points because Starbucks corporation owns the place you live (if there is no people's government any more, for e.g.) and taxes are due in Starbucks points or they'll take your property, then you will need to work for Starbucks points.
Either people run governments for themselves to do the things that people want done to run their societies or they abdicate and will have their societies run for them. If people don't participate in their governments then businesses will take over the governments and run the society to benefit businesses over people. If the government starves and fades away because the businesses aren't willing to pay for it to do this (because the people will be too poor to pay for it by then) then it will collapse and the businesses will just run the society without a "peoples'" government.
The East Idea Trading Company used to run several countries. It wasn't good for the people that lived there. They didn't experience "freedom".