Obama adviser wants pre-schoolers to have sex

redrumloa

Active Member
Moderator
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
14,966
Reaction score
2,154
'Safe schools' chief recommends child porn for classroom reading
'Sex acts between preschoolers' among subjects of books backed by openly 'gay' Obama adviser


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=117978

A new report is raising alarms that the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network, a homosexual advocacy organization founded by Kevin Jennings, now head of the U.S. Office of Safe Schools for the Obama administration, is recommending XXX-rated sex writings for children as young as preschoolers.

"We were unprepared for what we encountered. Book after book after book contained stories and anecdotes that weren't merely X-rated and pornographic, but which featured explicit descriptions of sex acts between preschoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air," said the report.

"One memoir even praised becoming a prostitute as a way to increase one's self-esteem. Above all, the books seemed to have less to do with promoting tolerance than with an unabashed attempt to indoctrinate students into a hyper-sexualized worldview," it advised.

The report was posted online by Jim Hoft at the Gatetway Pundit blog after it was obtained from Breitbart.tv co-founder Scott Baker, who said the recommended children's reading assignments need attention.

:shocked:
 
Sorry but my bet is Wing Nutters Daily is just as likely to have spun this to the extreme. WND is a crappy blog masquerating as news.
 
World Net Daily?

Sweet, suffering pajamas, Jim, you're actually Billsey and I claim my five pounds!

:shocked:

The fact that there is not a single bit of substance in the quote only highlights how idiotic that site is.

I'll assume you posted this unmitigated horse-shite for a laugh.
Otherwise I'd recommend you seriously take a step back and consider your irrational hatred for your president and how unhinged it makes you appear.
 
Red, can you back this up with a website that doesn't feature regular "articles" by the legendary Chuck Norris? I'm thinking not...

Chuck should have stuck to acting. Actually, he should have just stuck to getting kicked in the head....
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jD2xtlt ... r_embedded

If it’s all about tolerance, why is the following question necessary?
David LaFontaine, chairman of the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth and the man who is mostly responsible for the Gay Straight Alliances in Massachusetts, tells us, “We believe very strongly that all students should not be sexually active in high school.”

Woman: Question is: What’s fisting?

Man: A little known fact is that you don’t make a fist like this. When they do it, it’s like this. This is a lot easier than this. [laughter]

Woman: You work your way up to it… [unclear] one finger, two fingers, three fingers … Some people can take a hand, or they can’t take a hand.

It’s about tolerance? If Gay Straight Alliances are not about sex, why are the people who run Gay Straight Alliances telling students about fisting? What you did not see is the man leading the discussion positioning his hand and showing 14 year olds how to insert their entire hand into the rectum of their sex partner.

From here:
http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/07/fis ... year-olds/
 
Pathetic, isn't it, what meaningless distractions have to be thrown at people to distract their outrage from the real problems in the world - but they fall for it, every time. A little fisting, a little Tiger Woods - any old sexual titillation and the prudish masses will jump all over it like ants to a picnic all the while saying how appalled they are - like that's fooling anyone.
 
redrumloa said:
@Robert & Mike

You guys never heard of a site called Google? Don't like my source, use Google to see plenty of other sources. I had no idea what WND was, I just copied the first link in Google news at the time after I heard of this nonsense.

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/20 ... ding-list/

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/199837.php

http://www.examiner.com/x-25466-DC-Inde ... o-children

Need more?

I'm leaving for work and have a feeling there will be nothing of anymore substance in those links than the pile of kiech you posted earlier. I'm not about to trawl through three other sites in a futile attempt to give your claim credibility.

Feel free to post any quotes from your own links that show otherwise.
 
Robert said:
I'm leaving for work and have a feeling there will be nothing of anymore substance in those links than the pile of kiech you posted earlier. I'm not about to trawl through three other sites in a futile attempt to give your claim credibility.

Yup, stick your fingers in your ears and yell LALALALALALALA all you want so you can turn around and claim mentioning such a thing is pathetic. But that's ok, I know the next thing you guys will fall back on is the fact Obama is black so anyone who doesn't want their pre-school aged kids encouraged to have sex must be a closet racist. :roll:
 
redrumloa said:
Yup, stick your fingers in your ears and yell LALALALALALALA all you want so you can turn around and claim mentioning such a thing is pathetic. But that's ok, I know the next thing you guys will fall back on is the fact Obama is black so anyone who doesn't want their pre-school aged kids encouraged to have sex must be a closet racist. :roll:

WTF are you talking about?

You start a thread with this title:
"Obama adviser wants pre-schoolers to have sex"

You then post a quote which says nothing of the sort.

Now, if you actually have something to back up your claim, post it.
Do not post a series of links and expect me to carry out your wild goose chase for you.

I honestly thought you were kidding when you started this thread.
It appears, however, that you are completely serious and that concerns me.

If you *are* serious but cannot substantiate your "Obama adviser wants pre-schoolers to have sex" claim properly, yet really believe it, I suggest you speak to someone about irrational anger.

I'm not joking.
 
MATHS will finally be dropped from the school curriculum so that children can be taught the safest way to find pornography on the internet.

Ministers say the online pornography lessons will include an updated version of the 'green cross code' though officials stressed it will focus on orgasms instead of not crossing between parked cars.

The new code will urge the under 12s to: 'STOP' feeling guilty and unclean, 'LOOK' for a disclaimer stating that all participants are over 18, and 'LISTEN' for the thrilling sound of two - or three - healthy young adults reaching an eye-boggling climax.

The scheme will also see the return of the Tufty Club, but instead of showing children how to cross the road safely the friendly squirrel will teach them how to complete all six stages of a reverse Dutch steamboat without breaking their collar bone.

The move is the latest stage in the government's plan to dismantle the traditional curriculum and replace it with a programme of '21st century skills' to ensure British workers will faithfully obey the commands of their ruthless Chinese gangmasters.

Geography has already been replaced with six hours a week of sexual hygiene, including practical lessons on the importance of trimming your fingernails before engaging in elaborate fistwork.

Meanwhile history and science will be phased out to make way for a weekly three-hour lecture about why Christmas is a propaganda tool for the fascist white oligarchy.

A typical primary school day in England now consists of:

9am: Renunciation of Christ

9.30: Genital drawing class

11.30: Quiet piercing time

12.30: Chips and skunk

2pm: Reading out-loud from both volumes of Great British Homosexuals

2.30pm: Dirty words

3pm: Simulated felching (with juice)

3.30pm: Home to the racist parents who want to shackle your free spirit with the totalitarian chains of English and arithmetic.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
 
Robert said:
redrumloa said:
@Robert & Mike

You guys never heard of a site called Google? Don't like my source, use Google to see plenty of other sources. I had no idea what WND was, I just copied the first link in Google news at the time after I heard of this nonsense.

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/20 ... ding-list/

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/199837.php

http://www.examiner.com/x-25466-DC-Inde ... o-children

Need more?

I'm leaving for work and have a feeling there will be nothing of anymore substance in those links than the pile of kiech you posted earlier. I'm not about to trawl through three other sites in a futile attempt to give your claim credibility.

Feel free to post any quotes from your own links that show otherwise.
If you followed the first link you'd find things like...
"A man masturbates and explicitly ejaculates as he sits on a hill overlooking his hometown" ...

OMG SAVE OUR 7-12th GRADERS, :roflmao:

The 2nd article says it best...
"Yeah, I dunno if it's his reading list. It's his organization's."
--
I think this clarifies what is going on. It appears these books weren't made by Obama's appointee in his offical role. They might have been reading books from an ex-organization he belonged to. There is no evidence here to even show they were books that were approved while he was part of the organization, they may well have come after. There is no evidence to show he personally approved these books.

Clearly what is not being done is having the right-wing blogosphere measure the man by his results. Instead they are guessing at past actions and trying to build guilt by association. SAD, and typical.
 
In related news... Having casual sex has no measureable psychological impact. LINK
 
faethor said:
In related news... Having casual sex has no measureable psychological impact. LINK
When I followed your link all I got was:
Session Cookie Error

An error has occured because we were unable to send a cookie to your web browser.

Session cookies are commonly used to facilitate improved site navigation. In order to use Wiley InterScience you must have your browser set to accept cookies.

Once you have logged in to Wiley InterScience, our Web server uses a temporary cookie to help us manage your visit. This Session Cookie is deleted when you logoff Wiley InterScience, or when you quit your browser. The cookie allows us to quickly determine your access control rights and your personal preferences during your online session. The Session Cookie is set out of necessity and not out of convenience.

Not very interesting I'm afraid.... :-( I'm guessing that URL is tied to your user account or something.
 
Back
Top