- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
- Messages
- 5,144
- Reaction score
- 1,243
Hardly surprising, given the two main choices.
well, it's really including people who may be religious/spiritual but not affiliated with a church (or whatever) as well as atheists (like myself) who have yet to see any proof for the existence of ANY god.
And, of course, everyone else who didn't vote for Gary Johnson?It means atheists were unable to think for themselves, otherwise they would have voted for Gary Johnson.
1/100th of the population can think for themselves then. I believe Gary Johnson got about 1% of the popular vote.
Obama also got a good chunk of women voters. Most women like being Free. They like being able to choose their own careers, make their own money, decide where they will go and when. Once you have a taste of Freedom you are loath to give it up.
1/100th of the population can think for themselves then. I believe Gary Johnson got about 1% of the popular vote.
1/100th of the population can think for themselves then.
1) I refuse to click on a link to an article where the writer doesn't understand the difference between "you're" and "your"67% of single women voted for Obama, only took a few bucks worth of contraceptives and they dropped their panties and voted for Obama. If women can't get married, their only choice is to marry the government.
Why your not married
1) I refuse to click on a link to an article where the writer doesn't understand the difference between "you're" and "your"
I think that was Metalman. The article has 'you're' and he had typed 'your' in his post. It looks like Metalman fixed his post.1) I refuse to click on a link to an article where the writer doesn't understand the difference between "you're" and "your"
Be sure and read the compassionate and non-violent comments
ROFL
That means that statistically, no one on this forum is capable of independent thought. And if there is, at most it would be just one of us. Probably Wayne, who's independent enough to do other things.Unfortunately, I think you're estimating high. That would mean one out of 100 people you talk to has the capability of truly independent thought. In general, I don't see it.
That means that statistically, no one on this forum is capable of independent thought. And if there is, at most it would be just one of us. Probably Wayne, who's independent enough to do other things.
You can't apply that statistic to this sub sample - partly because here at least we can read and write.That means that statistically, no one on this forum is capable of independent thought. And if there is, at most it would be just one of us. Probably Wayne, who's independent enough to do other things.
I've never taken money from the government. not unemployment, not welfare, not anything.So you prefer the government to be your pimp daddy
I know that seems strange to you, but that's because you are a sexist piece of shit