Police state is here and the Liberal Media is running distotion

the problem is that this happened in texas
 
Even after all these years and huge amounts of evidence to the contrary, you're persisting with this increasingly transparent charade that you supposedly think the media is liberal?
You don't really still still think that, do you?

If you really are still managing to pull the wool over your own eyes with this blindingly obvious bunkum, I can only congratulate you on a quite staggering feat of cognitive dissonance.
 
Everything is liberal when your're an extremist.
 
@Robert/Mike
Maybe not in Glasgow or Kanada, but in the USA MSNBC is universally known as the official media outlet of the democrat party. I doubt faethor or CC would deny this.
 
I won't bother to argue about MSNBC, but I will say this in a nerdy kinda way:

Code:
bool is_media_liberal = GetAllOfUsMedia() == USMEDIA::MSNBC;

Btw, I just quit my job of writing crappy Oracle SQL and got a new one doing high performance C++ work. Woohoo!
 
@Robert/Mike
Maybe not in Glasgow or Kanada, but in the USA MSNBC is universally known as the official media outlet of the democrat party. I doubt faethor or CC would deny this.
I fully deny that simply because there's no such thing as 'the democrat party'. We do have a party named the Democratic Party. They're certainly more liberal than other parties. But, they're working hard at not being liberal. They're more Reagan Centrist than liberal. Heck the 'liberal' president is to the right of the Republican Reagan.
 
@Robert/Mike
Maybe not in Glasgow or Kanada, but in the USA MSNBC is universally known as the official media outlet of the democrat party.

That may well be true but the "democrat party" are hardly liberal.
They're mostly bought and paid for by the same corporations who own most of the "republican party" and also own the media that you claim is liberal.
 
They're certainly more liberal than other parties. But, they're working hard at not being liberal. They're more Reagan Centrist than liberal. Heck the 'liberal' president is to the right of the Republican Reagan.

This is encouraging. Recognising the problem is the first step to solving it. :D
 
That may well be true but the "democrat party" are hardly liberal.
They're mostly bought and paid for by the same corporations who own most of the "republican party" and also own the media that you claim is liberal.

I don't much argue that point the channels are largely bought by the same people. I do argue with the point that Obama is to the right of Reagan which is laughable. GWB was to the left of Carter!

About the media, call it what you want but they are all mouthpieces for the Democrat Party except the recent Fox. I have issues with Fox also, but they are different issues.
 
I don't much argue that point the channels are largely bought by the same people. I do argue with the point that Obama is to the right of Reagan which is laughable. .
Who gave illegals amnesty, negotiated with terrorists, cut and ran the military when attacked by foreigners, signed 11 raises in taxes, who had the biggest corporate tax hike ever, tripled the deficit, funded the Taliban? (Hint: out of the two choices it wasn't Obama.)
 
I don't much argue that point the channels are largely bought by the same people. I do argue with the point that Obama is to the right of Reagan which is laughable. GWB was to the left of Carter!

About the media, call it what you want but they are all mouthpieces for the Democrat Party except the recent Fox. I have issues with Fox also, but they are different issues.

You are clearly not speaking the same English as the rest of us. It looks like you need to start explaining what you mean when you use the words LEFT and RIGHT.
 
You are clearly not speaking the same English as the rest of us. It looks like you need to start explaining what you mean when you use the words LEFT and RIGHT.
EDIT: Wanted to reword this better.
I think the valid question is - what does left or right mean. In the case of many people here, and elsewhere, they view left or right as 2 static points on a line. The parties may move about the line but the 'left' or 'right' do not change. Other people (for example: Fox News, Redrumloa) appear to treat Left and Right as alternative names for the 2 parties. Where Left always means Democratic Party and Right always means Republican party. In the dynamic usage even though the parties move around the line, the Democratic Party is always called Left.
 
Just watched the video finally. So Lawrence got his impression of the event from standing on a corner for the day, and Ron got his impressions from the "liberal media" therefore Ron Paul is a liar? Nice.
 
Back
Top