Ready for the next Ice Age? Winter is coming.

Global Warming Alarmist Barbra Streisand Flew Her Dogs 10,000 Miles to Watch Her Sing

Indeed Streisand’s 10,000-mile jaunts on carbon-pumping private jets only arm her critics with proof that her global warming alarmism is nothing more than hot air. And the Grammy-winnning singer’s social media is a near-constant stream of climate change doom-mongering.

Last week, Streisand declared that all climate change deniers need to be voted out of office.
Proving what? There's no such thing as global warming? Barbara is no genius? Or that Breitbart doesn't realize that bringing three little dogs with you on the plane that is carrying you to a destination where you are to perform a show doesn't amount to a hill of beans of difference compared to the weight of Barbara and her stuff flying without the dogs.

It's also a pretty good troll post designed to trigger their target audience into posting before thinking.
 
Proving what? There's no such thing as global warming? Barbara is no genius? Or that Breitbart doesn't realize that bringing three little dogs with you on the plane that is carrying you to a destination where you are to perform a show doesn't amount to a hill of beans of difference compared to the weight of Barbara and her stuff flying without the dogs.

It's also a pretty good troll post designed to trigger their target audience into posting before thinking.

Zoom! Right over your head.
 
Zoom! Right over your head.
Better explain it to me then. How much extra carbon is produced by her taking 3 tiny dogs with her. It's not like they get their own plane, and she's going anyway - because promoters have sold the show and people have bought tickets.
 
Better explain it to me then. How much extra carbon is produced by her taking 3 tiny dogs with her. It's not like they get their own plane, and she's going anyway - because promoters have sold the show and people have bought tickets.

Somewhat clickbaity headline, but the article exposes her as just another Limousine Liberal. Preaching all this conservation for the non-elite, while she jet sets around the world in luxury. Do you know the carbon footprint of a private jet? Just another Al Gore, preaching doom and gloom while living a life that creates thousands, tens of thousands, or more, the amount of carbon than the average person.
 
Well duh! Shame some here fell for defending it.

Chief of Staff for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Admits Green New Deal isn’t About Climate Change

We’ve long been warning you about the left’s ulterior motives in promoting this climate hysteria. As if them lamenting the evils of fossil fuels while jet-setting all over the globe didn’t cue the warning bells already. Welp, just have a look at this admission about the Green New Deal from AOC’s chief of staff:

Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “Green New Deal” is more about drastically overhauling the American economy than it is about combatting climate change, her top aide admitted.

Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, made the revealing admission in a meeting with Democratic Washington Gov. Jay Inslee’s climate director in May. A Washington Post reporter accompanied Chakrabarti to the meeting for a magazine profile published Wednesday.

“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” Chakrabarti said to Inslee’s climate director, Sam Ricketts.
“Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” Chakrabarti added.

How does it feel to be a chump?
 
FYI, I think this guy is a dick, but at least he eats his own dog food. I respect that, it is exceeding rare.

Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters spotted riding NYC subway

mega463383_028.jpg
 
Somewhat clickbaity headline, but the article exposes her as just another Limousine Liberal. Preaching all this conservation for the non-elite, while she jet sets around the world in luxury. Do you know the carbon footprint of a private jet? Just another Al Gore, preaching doom and gloom while living a life that creates thousands, tens of thousands, or more, the amount of carbon than the average person.
You ever hear of "Motte & Bailey' argument? It's something that seems to be common to both the unhinged left and the unhinged right - which boils down to "say something totally f*kin nuts, then claim that you actually meant a more reasonable thing instead".

Here we have "She flies her dogs around in a private jet!!!!" become, "she flies a lot". If that was your point you could have started from there and probably have a sympathetic hearing, but you didn't. You were tricked into rage sharing a link that was over the top and if you then claim that your real point was actually more nuanced then I'll respect you about as much as I respect the SJWs that do the same thing. A general rule you should try to adhere to is not to post a link until you have read the article it links to.
 
Here's a side effect most people won't have given much consideration:
Permafrost thaw sparks fear of mammoth ivory 'gold rush' in Russia
Prospectors dig up remains of extinct animals for trade worth an estimated £40m a year
4772.jpg

Activists and officials in northern Russia have warned of a “gold rush” for mammoth ivory as prospectors dig up tusks and other woolly mammoth remains that can net a small fortune on the rapacious Chinese market.

Melting permafrost from global heating has made it easier for locals to retrieve the remains of woolly mammoths, which have been extinct for thousands of years, and sell them on to China, where the ivory is fashioned into jewellery, trinkets, knives, and other decorations.
 
We are all not dying in 12 years any longer. We are dying in 18 months.

Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months

Hitch your wagon to this hysteria all you wish, just know I will be here to LOL about it.
Do you have any functioning brain cells left or are you assuming that we don't have any? I'm presuming that you are deliberately misconstruing the article because it makes me feel better to think that, because if you honestly think that's literally what the article says I am very concerned for you.
 
... if you honestly think that's literally what the article says...

Indeed, it seems blindingly obvious that it doesn't claim that but confirmation bias can sometimes be surprisingly powerful and weird.

As an aside, halfway down the article is a link to another news item from yesterday, reporting that Europe is experiencing record July temperatures following June records being broken across the continent.
The UK is expected to break not only its highest July temperature but its highest ever. (And I'm stuck in work. :confused:)
And:
Elsewhere Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands all recorded their highest ever temperatures on Wednesday.

Turning out to be quite a summer.
 
Do you have any functioning brain cells left or are you assuming that we don't have any? I'm presuming that you are deliberately misconstruing the article because it makes me feel better to think that, because if you honestly think that's literally what the article says I am very concerned for you.

I didn't make the headline. If you click the link, you will see that is that is the actual headline.

Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months

That headline is not just left wing BBC. Let me Google that for you. So are you disavowing that headline? Or do you have have no functional brain cells left? Sheep will be sheep I suppose.
 
I didn't make the headline. If you click the link, you will see that is that is the actual headline.

Climate change: 12 years to save the planet? Make that 18 months

That headline is not just left wing BBC. Let me Google that for you. So are you disavowing that headline? Or do you have have no functional brain cells left? Sheep will be sheep I suppose.
I'm not arguing about whether that is the headline or even whether I agree with it but with the fact that you interpreted it as "We are all not dying in 12 years any longer. We are dying in 18 months." That is not the actions of a person who can be taken seriously.
 
I'm not arguing about whether that is the headline or even whether I agree with it but with the fact that you interpreted it as "We are all not dying in 12 years any longer. We are dying in 18 months." That is not the actions of a person who can be taken seriously.

Gee, your mirror must be broken and comprehension sorely lacking. I didn't make up that quote of "We are all dying in 12 years", that would be you AGW cultists.

USA Today: 'The world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change,' Ocasio-Cortez says


Washington Post: Ocasio-Cortez says the world will end in 12 years. She is absolutely right.

Let me Google that again for you.

I agree, you can't take these people seriously. You can't take the cult of AGW seriously whatsoever. I would be pleased to see your eyes start to open.
 
... so, let's just get this straight. You complain weekly about how badly liberal news misquotes and mangles everything the right says. But when they quote scientists, they're suddenly 100% spot on in reporting what scientists have said. (sigh, dejected facepalm)
 
... so, let's just get this straight. You complain weekly about how badly liberal news misquotes and mangles everything the right says. But when they quote scientists, they're suddenly 100% spot on in reporting what scientists have said. (sigh, dejected facepalm)

The point is in there, but you missed it entirely. The vast majority of the AGW crowd get their AGW views from the Liberal Media and Pop Culture. Go on a college campus and interview students. I bet you'll find at least 9/10 who think polar bears are now extinct, the north pole is completely ice free, the "Green New Deal" is something we should do, and the world is going to end in either 18 months or 12 years.
 
I don't care what AOC says on this. The article said we have 18 months to take action - YOU said we are dying in 18 months. Those two things are not the same. Take some damn responsibility for your own mouth. What AOC says is her problem. What you say is yours.
 
The article said we have 18 months to take action - YOU said we are dying in 18 months. Those two things are not the same.

What part of "The world is going to end" do you not understand?

Washington Post: Ocasio-Cortez says the world will end in 12 years. She is absolutely right.

If the world ends, we have nowhere to go. We are all dead. It is not just AoC as shown above and with a simple web search. This is the new official AGW cult talking point. Stop trying to run cover for an obvious scam, just because it has communist implications.
 
This doesn't seem to be satire.

Rest Easy, The World's Billionaires Have Formed a Yacht Flotilla to Fight Climate Change

At a Google-sponsored rich people summer camp, the world’s nobles, including two prominent English Harrys (Prince and Styles, respectively), along with noted environmental scientists Leonardo DiCaprio, Katy Perry, and Orlando Bloom, brainstormed to fix this pesky global warming once and for all. Their solution involved flying a combined total of 114 private jets to Sicily and creating a massive floating island of “mega-yachts” where Coldplay provided a live soundtrack to their party talk of greenhouse gasses and the potentially amusing prospect of watching the unwashed fight to the death for potable water. Prince Harry also reportedly delivered an impassioned speech about the environment while barefoot and presumably holding a plate of humpback whale crudo.
 
Back
Top