- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
- Messages
- 5,144
- Reaction score
- 1,243
faethor said:
redrumloa said:The Fox story references CORD being used which I don't know anyone against. The use of aborted babies for medical research is where the problem lies. Is there any point arguing this on Whyzzat again?
Not always but at least here on Whyzzat the more right wing people lean against stem cell research. Many right-wing sources have cited that stem cell have yet to produce any useful treatments. Right wingers, here at least, have a it came from Fox so therefore it's gotta be true attitude. Well, here is Fox News publishing a story on how someone was healed with Cord "blood" which are in reality... Stem Cells. Yup we already have treatments with stem cells and we should fully continue and push forward with further treatments and uses for Stem Cells.cybereye said:Is that a whole story here? Did the CORD from the aborted babies? It just a question of what on my mind.redrumloa said:The Fox story references CORD being used which I don't know anyone against. The use of aborted babies for medical research is where the problem lies. Is there any point arguing this on Whyzzat again?
I agree.it may have set the USA back far enough that we may have lost an industry
redrumloa said:@faethor
Again you gloss over a few things. The Fox story mentions cord blood which probably came from live births, not aborted babies.
FluffyMcDeath said:I don't think aborted babies were ever the issue. The main contention was about whether fertilized ova left over from in vitro fertilization could be used for stem cell research (they are currently destroyed).
The plus is Stem Cells have never used aborted babies, at least in the USA. So alls good and there was no legitimate reason for the Bush Administration to stop the progress of the industry.redrumloa said:FluffyMcDeath said:I don't think aborted babies were ever the issue. The main contention was about whether fertilized ova left over from in vitro fertilization could be used for stem cell research (they are currently destroyed).
I have never heard an argument against stem cell research except in the case of using aborted babies.
redrumloa said:I have never heard an argument against stem cell research except in the case of using aborted babies.
and we know how ignorant they are about biology - these people still think the world is 6000 years old :roll:FluffyMcDeath said:redrumloa said:I have never heard an argument against stem cell research except in the case of using aborted babies.
"Aborted babies" is what the Republicans call the unimplanted blastocyst left over from in vitro fertilization.