The TeaParty is just the GOP

I haven't been following them closely. Are they actually running anywhere as their own party or just trying to hi-jack Republican primaries?
 
redrumloa said:
You didn't see the fugly primary in Florida.

Bill McCollum refuses to back Rick Scott, cites qualms
http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/08/26/1 ... scott.html


McCollum was establishment and had full support of the GOP, Rick Scott had Tea Party backing.

Sounds like the GOP is using the Tea Party to replace some of their own with richer dirtier crooks. Scott runs tea Party and as soon as he's in he's all - I'm working with the GOP.
 
Robert said:
I haven't been following them closely. Are they actually running anywhere as their own party or just trying to hi-jack Republican primaries?

The 'Tea Party' is not a political party, but a movement. Until this point, they have stated they do not plan to create a political party since in theory they want support from both sides of the isle.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Sounds like the GOP is using the Tea Party to replace some of their own with richer dirtier crooks. Scott runs tea Party and as soon as he's in he's all - I'm working with the GOP.

Actually I would say the opposite. The GOP fought tooth and nail to defeat Rick Scott in the primary. Rudy Giuliani was just one of the big names the GOP sent down to campaign for McCollum. It wasn't until after Scott won did the GOP reluctantly start backing him and even then some like McCollum refuse to.
 
redrumloa said:
It wasn't until after Scott won did the GOP reluctantly start backing him and even then some like McCollum refuse to.
But he's going to work with the GOP - not the Tea Party. So he isn't really Tea Party. He's shown his true colours.
 
redrumloa said:
Robert said:
I haven't been following them closely. Are they actually running anywhere as their own party or just trying to hi-jack Republican primaries?

The 'Tea Party' is not a political party, but a movement.

Called a party but not a party? Somewhat confusing for outsiders looking in.

Until this point, they have stated they do not plan to create a political party since in theory they want support from both sides of the isle.

So they disagree with both parties but want to run using the established party names?

How depressing.
 
The TeaParty can be fairly explained if a group of GOP were in a coma from 2000-2008, woke up, and refused to learn what transpired as they slept.
 
faethor said:
The TeaParty can be fairly explained if a group of GOP were in a coma from 2000-2008, woke up, and refused to learn what transpired as they slept.
:roflmao:

i think some are still in a coma
 
It's taken three trips to Kentucky, but I'm finally getting my Tea Party epiphany exactly where you'd expect: at a Sarah Palin rally. The red-hot mama of American exceptionalism has flown in to speak at something called the National Quartet Convention in Louisville, a gospel-music hoedown in a giant convention center filled with thousands of elderly white Southerners. Palin — who earlier this morning held a closed-door fundraiser for Rand Paul, the Tea Party champion running for the U.S. Senate — is railing against a GOP establishment that has just seen Tea Partiers oust entrenched Republican hacks in Delaware and New York. The dingbat revolution, it seems, is nigh.

"We're shaking up the good ol' boys," Palin chortles, to the best applause her aging crowd can muster. She then issues an oft-repeated warning (her speeches are usually a tired succession of half-coherent one-liners dumped on ravenous audiences like chum to sharks) to Republican insiders who underestimated the power of the Tea Party Death Star. "Buck up," she says, "or stay in the truck."

Stay in what truck? I wonder. What the hell does that even mean?

Scanning the thousands of hopped-up faces in the crowd, I am immediately struck by two things. One is that there isn't a single black person here. The other is the truly awesome quantity of medical hardware: Seemingly every third person in the place is sucking oxygen from a tank or propping their giant atrophied glutes on motorized wheelchair-scooters. As Palin launches into her Ronald Reagan impression — "Government's not the solution! Government's the problem!" — the person sitting next to me leans over and explains.

Read on

Whilst my title might well be OTT, I would say that this from a non US perspective is insightful on how the GOP has nommed up the Teabaggers for their own use.

TL;DR?

Vast forests have already been sacrificed to the public debate about the Tea Party: what it is, what it means, where it's going. But after lengthy study of the phenomenon, I've concluded that the whole miserable narrative boils down to one stark fact: They're full of shit. All of them.
 
redrumloa said:
Robert said:
Called a party but not a party? Somewhat confusing for outsiders looking in.

The movement is named after the famous Boston Tea Party of 1773.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party

Yes, and it was started by the media and republican media operatives to suck people away from the Ron Paul Revolution which was looking like it could draw votes away on some tight seats. It has even mobilized against Ron Paul. Ironically it is backing his son, Rand Paul. It seems they may be playing father and son against each other.

As far as I can see, the Tea Party is the same right wing loonery that has been taking over the GOP for the last couple of decades and it has now switched to a strategy of using the politically disaffected help pound the final few (dirtbag fundy loon) nails into the GOP coffin. It's going to be a very ugly GOP by the time they get back into power.
 
redrumloa said:
Robert said:
Called a party but not a party? Somewhat confusing for outsiders looking in.

The movement is named after the famous Boston Tea Party of 1773.

Yes and that really begs the (somewhat rhetorical, since we can all guess the real answer) question - why?

There have very little (if anything) in common.
 
Robert said:
redrumloa said:
Robert said:
Called a party but not a party? Somewhat confusing for outsiders looking in.

The movement is named after the famous Boston Tea Party of 1773.

Yes and that really begs the (somewhat rhetorical, since we can all guess the real answer) question - why?
Conservatives glorify the past.
 
Robert said:
Yes and that really begs the (somewhat rhetorical, since we can all guess the real answer) question - why?

There have very little (if anything) in common.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement

The theme of the Boston Tea Party, an iconic event of American history, has long been used by anti-tax protesters.It was part of Tax Day protests held throughout the 1990s and earlier More recently, the Libertarian theme of the "tea party" began with Republican Congressman Ron Paul supporters as a fund raising event during the 2008 presidential primaries to emphasize Paul's fiscal conservatism, which laid the groundwork for the modern-day Tea Party movement.
 
Yes, like I said, nothing in common with the original.

Boston:
because they believed that it violated their right to be taxed only by their own elected representatives.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party

Taxation without representation.

But the current 'party' seem to think that by simply hi-jacking the name and using this powerful, historic imagery to make a tenuous connection to any old tax they don't like, some people will be stupid enough to swallow it.

And I suppose they've been proved right, up to a point. Pretty transparent to most people though, wouldn't you agree?
 
Mildly related, but funny just the same...



:lol:
 
Back
Top