There was video of the Fort Hood shooting

redrumloa said:
FluffyMcDeath said:
and then there wasn't.

Why would anyone order such a thing?
Click to expand...

Why should someone profit from the video of people being murdered?
Click to expand...

That is the most half way not totally ridiculous theory I've heard so far for the benefit of the destruction of evidence. It has an emotional appeal.

On the other hand - why should someone NOT profit so long as they didn't do the murdering? At least someone gets something positive out of it. On the third hand, wouldn't confiscation serve to prevent the footage being used for profit AND preserve a record of the event for possible prosecutions and training?

Now, I could see there might be a problem if the footage shows people acting improperly or dishonorably or reveals that standard procedures that should have prevented this were not followed.

I would have thought that correct handling and collection of evidence would be proper procedure following a crime. Perhaps the procedures are out of whack in that place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top