Windows Phone backers declare mobile war

  • Thread starter Thread starter News Feed
  • Start date Start date
N

News Feed

Guest
For the first time in a decade, Nokia appears to have a fighting chance in the North American phone market. AT&T Mobility will carry and help promote the Lumia 900, a Windows phone that looks to be Nokia's flagship product.

998-pFFHCfY


Original Source: CNN - Continue reading...
 
Windows Phone 7. It's an interesting story as Microsoft went back to the drawing board. I'm one of a few users (about 2% of us in the USA). Absolutely love it! The iPhone is neat and all but it's chicklet tabs and scrolling seems to be an early computing model. Windows Phone 7 interface and interactivity seems to be GUI next gen. It, mostly, removes the 'application' model of computing into a 'use' model. One doesn't need to go to an app they can go to a person that links together email, facebook, twitter, photos, etc.

Windows Phone 7 is gaining slowing. Last year the iPhone market, stalled. Meaning user count didn't change much. Android grew by 30-40%, which is huge. Windows Phone 7 grew by over 100%. So while small it is gaining momentum.
 
I think the future is Android. It's my belief that iOS has peaked and that the iPhone 4s was a bit of a letdown (not that it wasn't great, but it wasn't what many were expecting). And Apple will not be able to compete with the multiple form factors and non-stop onslaught on new competitors. They may still be the largest phone maker, but add up all the Android devices and they'll start to look small.

As for Windows, well, Microsoft came to the party a bit late. I would consider their phone market penetration a failure. But MS is going all in here as the next Windows 8 will be strongly tied to Windows Mobile. If MS fails to enter the market then, and W8 is still a long ways away, it may even trigger the death of the desktop. Let's face it, the future is probably gonna be what you can already do with the new Motorla Droid RAZR - connect it to a dock with a monitor and keyboard/mouse and use it as a desktop. The apps aren't there yet and even Android 4 needs some more work for UI to really make all that work, but Android is far ahead of iOS in that department. But basically, your computer will be your mobile phone, and all you'll need is a good docking station to change the form factor. And there's evidence that people like that. The ASUS Transformer was highly regarded because of it's keyboard dock. Lenovo is coming out with a similar setup. But if cloud computing takes off then the requirement of a high-end CPU/GPU is less important as the heavy lifting will be done elsewhere. So it's conceivable that MS will also loose it's desktop dominance to Android phones.

Android is also entering the home theater market. Samsung, LG and Lenovo have all announced their latest TVs to run Android. Lenovo was the first to announce ICS. Just pair a bluetooth keyboard/mouse and you'll wonder why you need a desktop or a game console anymore. The icing on the cake will be when they release developer tools for Android. Then you won't need Windows/Mac/Linux for anything.
 
Android is also entering the home theater market. Samsung, LG and Lenovo have all announced their latest TVs to run Android. Lenovo was the first to announce ICS. Just pair a bluetooth keyboard/mouse and you'll wonder why you need a desktop or a game console anymore. The icing on the cake will be when they release developer tools for Android. Then you won't need Windows/Mac/Linux for anything.

Your average user doesn't give a darn about dev tools. On the other hand, hackers may but will they be the kind of tools that come free and let you hack your home device without having to go through Google or Samsung or LG or whoever who, quite understandably, would want to monetize their platform and claim security? Once it's rolled out and it matures a little, will it end up just as iPhone, Wii, PSP, xBox and all those other computing platforms you have to jailbreak to run your own stuff on?
 
Android is a good system. The current problem is highlighted by Fluffy -Dev Tools. Androids don't have a consistent security model. The 'bring your own security' is something scary for the older generation and for corporations.
 
No, the dev tools comment was just a way to measure it's maturity. Once we see apps like Eclipse ported to Android, that's when you'll know Android is a serious contender for the desktop market. But I think that's a long ways away, as the OS is still geared toward single app/single screen. Not so much as Apple is, and that might soon change as I heard there's a commercial app out there designed to allow Android apps to run inside overlapping windows on Android tablets. So maybe by Android v5 (Jellybean)?

Well, fragmentation is a potential problem for Android, but that's a characteristic of open source projects - they often fragment because they can. The big worry was with Amazon as they seem to have a very focused requirement from Android, but so far it seems to all be one big happy family still. There are also a lot of custom Android builds but so far it seems the guys at Android have no problems gobbling up the good ideas since, hey, open source is a two way street after all. Will companies like Samsung decide to break off with their own version of Android locked to their own app store? Perhaps, but that could put them at a disadvantage as well. If you think about it, Google is likely to continue with it's current model even if some vendors go rogue. But those vendors will then have to not only fund all future development, but also deal with users who "jailbreak" their device and install a custom rom based on Google's open code. And to boot, they'd use their Google Android phone with a special app from the Google app store to jailbreak their rogue Samsung TV. I think Android's success is based on not being tied to any one vendor. I would think Vendors understand that and would not be quick to mess with that. We'll see.

One thing to note: Google phones can be "rooted", but that's mostly to gain lower level access. Some special apps do require that. Google does allow rooted phones on the market, but allows app developers to decide if their app can be installed on rooted phones. From what I gather, few developers see any value in filtering out rooted phones. One exception is the movie industry which still wants to encrypt their downloads and tie them to a specific account. Rooted phones can get around that and those with rooted phones may not be able to download movies from some sites. But that doesn't mean people don't wish to root their devices. ASUS has promised to release a special tool to root the back ordered Transformer Prime, but with a warning that they may not be able to rent movies online. I kinda like this approach, although ASUS says it will void your warranty as well which kinda sucks. But still, you have the option. Still, you have less reason to root an Android device than you do an iOS device as Android already allows you to install from any source and exposes your built-in SD card as a flash drive to a computer (meaning, you don't need specialized software to transfer data back and forth). But you're right, vendors may try to change all that. We'll have to wait and see.
 
That's why I drink my whiskey on the rocks!
 
Back
Top