With a Canadian style Health Care system the US could wipe out its deficit

http://www.european-hospital.com/en/article/8808-France_ranks_low_in_Europe_for_MRI_equipment.html

n average, European countries possess 17 MRI machines per one million people. With only 9.4 MRI machines per million people, France ranks between Portugal and Turkey, putting it among the least well-equipped in Europe, according to the Société Française de Radiologie.

It’s not a flattering assessment and quite a paradox that in the MRI stakes its rank is so lowly, considering that France is the European country that spends the most on healthcare – second only to Germany. France has four times less MRI machines than neighbouring Germany and two times less than Spain or Italy. In all, some 592 MRI scanners are operational (40 were installed only last year), which is simply insufficient according to radiology experts. France stands far behind Japan, or the USA, for the best rate of equipment and falls far below its own national programme to combat cancer (Plan Cancer 2009- 2013).
For the optimum handling of the disease, this recommended the availability of 10 MRI scanners per one million people by 2011 and a maximum of 10 to 15 days wait for patients. In reality, the average wait still remained at 32.2 days in 2011, compared to 34.5 days in 2009, and up to 55 days – almost two months – in the most underprivileged areas (Pays de la Loire, Poitou-Charente or Alsace). Considering the ageing population, which leads to new patho logies and new needs, it is considered that 63% of the French population is subjected to a waiting time exceeding 30 days, compared to 50% in 2006. Since its creation in 1999, the ISA (Imagerie Santé Avenir), which gathers medical imaging information, has annually evaluated the delay before obtaining an MRI appointment. After having repeatedly pointed out the French backwardness in terms of equipment, in recent years ISA has been even more preoccupied by the increasing geographic inequalities. In some areas of the country patients might wait up to 75 days!


Nice price, if you don't die before you get your turn.

 
yeah but flipside is in this country we cant bargain for lower rates from drug companies or health care. and theyve decided to bankrupt everyone for their services
 
Keeping the peasants alive is not high on the priority list.

It's kept me alive twice thanks.

Either operation would have bankrupted my family.

And there will always be limits on providing, in the US, it's cost, in the UK and to a lesser extent Canada and France, it's capacity.

Either will kill you. In the UK, Canada and France, it doesn't 99% of the time.
 
Keeping the peasants alive is not high on the priority list.
Life expectancy in France 80.7, Germany 79.4, Spain 80.9, Italy 80.5, UK 79.4... The USA ties with Cuba for 78.3 years. I'll agree these Europeans can probably do better, but, they do seem to have a lead on the peasants in the USA.
 
Life expectancy in France 80.7, Germany 79.4, Spain 80.9, Italy 80.5, UK 79.4... The USA ties with Cuba for 78.3 years. I'll agree these Europeans can probably do better, but, they do seem to have a lead on the peasants in the USA.

You can thank HFC, BPA's, GMO's and many other factors for that.
 
Keeping the peasants alive is not high on the priority list.
No, not in the US. In France how ever it seems to be as the French tend to live, on average, almost 3 years longer than Americans: List of countries by life expectancy

More importantly is how the US compares to Canada. The two countries are similar in many ways, with similar demographics and culture. The big key difference there is the health care system. It seems to me Canadians have the better system.

But then, you aren't much of an evidence guy are you?
 
Back
Top