A pathetic Bigfoot claim...

[faethor]

Doesn't one need a control sample to compare the DNA to? Where did they get the Bigfoot control?

What they confirmed is the DNA is from an unknown primate from a sample believed to be left by a Bigfoot, for me that is good enough.

Thanks.

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

 

[faethor]

Doesn't one need a control sample to compare the DNA to? Where did they get the Bigfoot control?

What they confirmed is the DNA is from an unknown primate from a sample believed to be left by a Bigfoot, for me that is good enough.

Thanks.

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

 

[faethor]

Doesn't one need a control sample to compare the DNA to? Where did they get the Bigfoot control?

What they confirmed is the DNA is from an unknown primate from a sample believed to be left by a Bigfoot, for me that is good enough.

Thanks.

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

 

[faethor]

Doesn't one need a control sample to compare the DNA to? Where did they get the Bigfoot control?

What they confirmed is the DNA is from an unknown primate from a sample believed to be left by a Bigfoot, for me that is good enough.

Thanks.

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

 

[redrumloa]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

 

[redrumloa]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

 

[redrumloa]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

 

[redrumloa]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

 

[redrumloa]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

 

[redrumloa]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

 

[faethor]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

Primate aliens likely landed and scratched themselves on a screw.

I didn't see the show but here's the thing. In order for a definitive DNA analysis one must compare the sample against a control. If the DNA was on a screw who knows what has happened to the quality of the sample. It likely was exposed to rust, time and atmospheric conditions. These all degrade the quality of the sample. One can't rule out that perhaps multiple primates (aka people) likely walked by and been scratched on the same screw depositing multiple DNA samples which are now intermixed. Even more likely some animals likely got scratched mixing their blood with the human primate blood. The scientific answer is we have a sample we cannot conclusively match to any knowns.

The belief part is that the unstated assumption (the condition of a pristine and singular being DNA sample) is right and we end up self deceiving and inserting that bigfoot is the only answer. The lack of evidence creates a false positive in those individuals who wish to believe. Unfortunately lack of evidence doesn't prove positive our asssumption, bigfoot exists.

 

[faethor]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

Primate aliens likely landed and scratched themselves on a screw.

I didn't see the show but here's the thing. In order for a definitive DNA analysis one must compare the sample against a control. If the DNA was on a screw who knows what has happened to the quality of the sample. It likely was exposed to rust, time and atmospheric conditions. These all degrade the quality of the sample. One can't rule out that perhaps multiple primates (aka people) likely walked by and been scratched on the same screw depositing multiple DNA samples which are now intermixed. Even more likely some animals likely got scratched mixing their blood with the human primate blood. The scientific answer is we have a sample we cannot conclusively match to any knowns.

The belief part is that the unstated assumption (the condition of a pristine and singular being DNA sample) is right and we end up self deceiving and inserting that bigfoot is the only answer. The lack of evidence creates a false positive in those individuals who wish to believe. Unfortunately lack of evidence doesn't prove positive our asssumption, bigfoot exists.

 

[faethor]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

Primate aliens likely landed and scratched themselves on a screw.

I didn't see the show but here's the thing. In order for a definitive DNA analysis one must compare the sample against a control. If the DNA was on a screw who knows what has happened to the quality of the sample. It likely was exposed to rust, time and atmospheric conditions. These all degrade the quality of the sample. One can't rule out that perhaps multiple primates (aka people) likely walked by and been scratched on the same screw depositing multiple DNA samples which are now intermixed. Even more likely some animals likely got scratched mixing their blood with the human primate blood. The scientific answer is we have a sample we cannot conclusively match to any knowns.

The belief part is that the unstated assumption (the condition of a pristine and singular being DNA sample) is right and we end up self deceiving and inserting that bigfoot is the only answer. The lack of evidence creates a false positive in those individuals who wish to believe. Unfortunately lack of evidence doesn't prove positive our asssumption, bigfoot exists.

 

[faethor]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

Primate aliens likely landed and scratched themselves on a screw.

I didn't see the show but here's the thing. In order for a definitive DNA analysis one must compare the sample against a control. If the DNA was on a screw who knows what has happened to the quality of the sample. It likely was exposed to rust, time and atmospheric conditions. These all degrade the quality of the sample. One can't rule out that perhaps multiple primates (aka people) likely walked by and been scratched on the same screw depositing multiple DNA samples which are now intermixed. Even more likely some animals likely got scratched mixing their blood with the human primate blood. The scientific answer is we have a sample we cannot conclusively match to any knowns.

The belief part is that the unstated assumption (the condition of a pristine and singular being DNA sample) is right and we end up self deceiving and inserting that bigfoot is the only answer. The lack of evidence creates a false positive in those individuals who wish to believe. Unfortunately lack of evidence doesn't prove positive our asssumption, bigfoot exists.

 

[faethor]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

Primate aliens likely landed and scratched themselves on a screw.

I didn't see the show but here's the thing. In order for a definitive DNA analysis one must compare the sample against a control. If the DNA was on a screw who knows what has happened to the quality of the sample. It likely was exposed to rust, time and atmospheric conditions. These all degrade the quality of the sample. One can't rule out that perhaps multiple primates (aka people) likely walked by and been scratched on the same screw depositing multiple DNA samples which are now intermixed. Even more likely some animals likely got scratched mixing their blood with the human primate blood. The scientific answer is we have a sample we cannot conclusively match to any knowns.

The belief part is that the unstated assumption (the condition of a pristine and singular being DNA sample) is right and we end up self deceiving and inserting that bigfoot is the only answer. The lack of evidence creates a false positive in those individuals who wish to believe. Unfortunately lack of evidence doesn't prove positive our asssumption, bigfoot exists.

 

[faethor]

Personally I see the conclusion as wrong but okay you are free to believe what you want.

If you didn't see the show, I recommend you watch it. It culminated with the DNA testing, but the whole investigation was interesting. The blood and tissue sample was from screws in a board left out front of a cabin. What other non-human unknown primate would be in rural Canada?

Primate aliens likely landed and scratched themselves on a screw.

I didn't see the show but here's the thing. In order for a definitive DNA analysis one must compare the sample against a control. If the DNA was on a screw who knows what has happened to the quality of the sample. It likely was exposed to rust, time and atmospheric conditions. These all degrade the quality of the sample. One can't rule out that perhaps multiple primates (aka people) likely walked by and been scratched on the same screw depositing multiple DNA samples which are now intermixed. Even more likely some animals likely got scratched mixing their blood with the human primate blood. The scientific answer is we have a sample we cannot conclusively match to any knowns.

The belief part is that the unstated assumption (the condition of a pristine and singular being DNA sample) is right and we end up self deceiving and inserting that bigfoot is the only answer. The lack of evidence creates a false positive in those individuals who wish to believe. Unfortunately lack of evidence doesn't prove positive our asssumption, bigfoot exists.