A Revolting Confession

How do you feel about the US torturing people day in day out. You probably wouldn't like it. That's why it's not on the news, but they haven't stopped doing it just because it's not on the news. How did you feel about Syria torturing people that were sent there to be tortured by the US CIA? The Americans were quite happy with the service back when they were outsourcing this kind of "enhanced interrogation" but now it's become "bad". Tut-tut.
I don't think you have to tell me about the hypocrasy, as I mentioned in a post before.

True, people shouldn't be tortured but let's not be tricked into thinking that Syria is somehow the center of the worlds torturing problems. We can look closer to home to find the people who pay to have people tortured in countries all around the world.
Don't be so picky, I needed an example which people won't react to in the lines of "what are you talking about never heard of it". I can't help we live in a world of perfectioned propaganda.
 
Yes. You are right. They are not horrific at all. Certainly they don't compare.
Not quite what I was trying to say. Let me rephrase then. Telling me you felt nothing for those killed on 9/11 can't be justified by the fact that you felt nothing for all those other attrocities. Your quote of Kurt Tucholsky doesn't quite apply here. In his time, reading about mass death in a news paper is quite different then watching it unfold with your own eyes. We watched 9/11 unfold with our own eyes even if they were electronic ones. I'm pretty sure Kurt Tucholsky would not agree with your logic here at all because after all he was a satirist (ironically, it may have supported your argument more if it was Stalin who made that statement). I somehow doubt you're being satirical here.
 
Telling me you felt nothing for those killed on 9/11 can't be justified by the fact that you felt nothing for all those other attrocities.
When the Death Star blew up at the end of Star Wars I don't think there were a lot of people in the audience thinking "Oh my God. All those people!" and that's NOT just because it is a movie because when the movie maker WANTS you to have an emotional reaction you will have one. The reaction you have is based on the point of view it has been presented with and what you are shown. The deaths of the people on the planes is much more important to the producers than the deaths of the people on Iran Air Flight 655, for example. They are telling the story that they want you to see and the stories of all those "other" people is kept hidden from you. I have feelings but I know when they are being manipulated too and I don't live through only my feelings, and nor do the people who run things - but they rely on you feeling that which they want you to.
 
Personally, I feel the same about Iran Air Flight 655 as I do about Korean Air 007. Fact is, you can get only so emotional about either as in both cases non of it was recorded and shown on TV (or YouTube). We didn't see footage of people burning to death or their horror as they fell from the sky because there is no such footage. I think Kurt Tucholsky's point is that no one sees a million people killed all at once and because of that you'll only ever read about such numbers in a news paper or text book. But that's NOT what this article is about Fluffy. This article is about a guy who felt joy watching the towers go down in real time, and if he was watching the TV that day like I was he probably saw the jumpers too. I personally find it hard to understand how you can separate the human/emotional part of this event from the politics strictly because of the fact that we witnessed it happen as it happened. 20 years from now people who weren't alive at the time may not have the same emotional impact, I can understand that because they don't have that emotional point of reference, but that's not what you're describing here.
 
Yes, the hypocrasy and the horrified reaction to seeing/hearing/reading about horrors are two seperate things.
 
Personally, I feel the same about Iran Air Flight 655 as I do about Korean Air 007. Fact is, you can get only so emotional about either as in both cases non of it was recorded and shown on TV (or YouTube).
Just put yourself there. You'll get emotional - see it or not. There';s no footage of most air disasters but you can't recreate the horror and empathize with the people with the slightest effort?

I think Kurt Tucholsky's point is that no one sees a million people killed all at once and because of that you'll only ever read about such numbers in a news paper or text book.
And we didn't see 3000 people die on TV and we didn't know them or anything about them until we were lead to it by the media.
But that's NOT what this article is about Fluffy. This article is about a guy who felt joy watching the towers go down in real time, and if he was watching the TV that day like I was he probably saw the jumpers too.
This is what makes it hard for you to read the article for what it says, I guess. People get stuck on - you didn't feel enough about the people so nothing else counts.
I personally find it hard to understand how you can separate the human/emotional part of this event from the politics strictly because of the fact that we witnessed it happen as it happened.
Come on Mike. How old are you? Do you still cry every time you scrape your knee? Or - wait, maybe you just haven't seen people getting killed enough "on TV". Yes, when they get quietly killed away from our sensitive eyes - that's different. You never saw the footage of the Hiroshima bomb? You think most people watch that and think about all the parents losing children, all the orphans, all the families burning together or apart - wondering where their brothers and sisters are, if they are alright - flesh peeling, eyes melting - or do they just see a big boom, or do they see a war ending, or so they see a technology demonstration to warn off a rising rival power? It's all of those things, of course - do you only see one thing and how do you know t is the right thing to see.

I admit that my experience of the event was coloured by my experience of the preceding decade, and what I had learned those symbols to mean. If you didn't have that perspective then you couldn't have seen it that way. Fair enough.

But it's not that he says he felt joy at the buildings going down. Do you feel joy when the team you support beats the guys they're up against just because you enjoy thinking about how much dissapointment those guys are feeling - or because the guys you support won? Further, do you feel joy when someone else knocks your teams strongest opposition on their ass just because you know how much it hurts them or because you know it improves your chances later?

You probably just can't see it - and that's OK. You ask me how I can separate things and I can but I don't know how and I won't, it seems, be able to make that make sense to you. I don't understand how people can't look at things on multiple levels. It baffles me so I admit to suspecting that people just pretend they can't do it for appearances sake - so that other people won't rag on them for being "cold".
 
Fascinating thread. I've never really thought about my feelings of what happened a decade ago in much depth but this thread has at least started the process. Very thought provoking, which is one of the reasons I come to this site. So for that, I doff my imaginary cap to Whyzzat in general and Fluffy in particular for kicking off such an intriguing, albeit controversial topic.

@Fluffy:

I admit that my experience of the event was coloured by my experience of the preceding decade, and what I had learned those symbols to mean. If you didn't have that perspective then you couldn't have seen it that way. Fair enough.

I think this is an important factor. When the events happened, I was much more ignorant of world events than I am now. I didn't feel any of the things mentioned in the article but I also didn't feel any immediate sense of the people involved and the actual horror of it all. If I'm honest with myself (and anyone reading this) I admit to being somewhat spellbound by the spectacle of it all, in a very detached way.

Would I have felt any of those things knowing what I know now? I don't think so but I couldn't say for certain. There have certainly been times when I've felt somewhat embarrassed at myself for more trivial shadenfreude and had a little difficulty rationalising those feelings. Never with anything involving people being killed (as far as I can remember) but I couldn't say with absolute certainty that I never will.
 
I remember the day, the first inckling I had of anything happening was whilst at my bank, a guy storms in quickly, pays his money and cries out to the staff, "you know you're next!"

When I got home I went on IRC and the people there were talking about something, when I asked what was up I was told "Dude, turn on the TV, any channel. Don't ask why, just do it."

And I switched over to bbc 1 live just as the second plane went in.

First reaction: I didn't realise there were films like this on at this time of day

Then a slow sickening feeling as I realised, this wasn't a movie.

Then kind of a numb shock at it all. Questions like "wtf, how did this happen?"
 
Just put yourself there. You'll get emotional - see it or not. There';s no footage of most air disasters but you can't recreate the horror and empathize with the people with the slightest effort?
Of course you can, but it's not the same. If fantasy is all we needed no one would bother making porn as it would be useless. See just one person jumping off the WTC and it's an all new ball game because that's an image you can't erase from your mind, never mind forget - and that's an image I've seen only that day. And now that I think of it, this kinda blows your little theory about media manipulation out of the water too, as it's the images that have been buried by he mainstream press that have stayed with me the longest.

And we didn't see 3000 people die on TV and we didn't know them or anything about them until we were lead to it by the media.
We had no idea how many people died at the time, and the numbers didn't matter as far as I'm concerned. As for the media leading us, well I think that's complete nonsense. The people demanded to see everything there was to see about the WTC. You're telling me you'd have rather watched the Simpsons? It's comments like this that expose how you view others - that we're nothing but dumb "sheeple" lead oh so easily. Not one original thought in our brains, all planted there by "the man" and his news media.

This is what makes it hard for you to read the article for what it says, I guess. People get stuck on - you didn't feel enough about the people so nothing else counts.
What the article is? A quick shot at fame perhaps? Nothing like a bit of controversy to get people reading - pretty handy for someone who makes his living off what he writes. Potvin has his reasons for writing that.

Come on Mike. How old are you? Do you still cry every time you scrape your knee? Or - wait, maybe you just haven't seen people getting killed enough "on TV".
Um, no, but I have been a witness to an actual murder. Someone did die in front of my eyes at the hands of another and I was unable to do anything. I also saw a guy get his brains splattered on the street when a car hit him. I can't say I felt great about either. Not sure how either event has changed me. How many people must I see die before I gain the clarity to see through all the horror and to focus on the great powers lurking in the shadows that pull the strings?

Yes, when they get quietly killed away from our sensitive eyes - that's different. You never saw the footage of the Hiroshima bomb?
Well, you're talking to someone who has a morbid curiosity about all things war. I HAVE thought about the dead at Hiroshima. Same goes for those who burned to death in a tank or drowned in a submarine. But this is all tangential, side tracking what started this thread. We're talking about someone who felt happy, not sadness, when two large buildings full of people were destroyed. The problem is he saw American imperialism collapsing, not the people faced with a dilemma of burning or jumping. Fact is he had no idea of how many died at the time, but it also seems he didn't care. His first thought was about his own political agenda. To me, this defines the person and tells me how he thinks.

I admit that my experience of the event was coloured by my experience of the preceding decade, and what I had learned those symbols to mean. If you didn't have that perspective then you couldn't have seen it that way. Fair enough.
Well, I certainly hadn't been brainwashed by far left groups if that's what you mean. Nope. But I am perhaps one of the few Westerners who had a good idea of who Osama bin Ladden was BEFORE 9/11 and also knew about Ahmad Shah Massoud's assassination on Sept 9, 2001 (an event that at the time I felt was tragic).

But it's not that he says he felt joy at the buildings going down.
But it is precisely that.

Do you feel joy when the team you support beats the guys they're up against just because you enjoy thinking about how much dissapointment those guys are feeling - or because the guys you support won?
So what team do you see yourself on? I'll tell you one thing, you're not on the team that brought down those towers. So why would you be pleased by their destruction? If anything, you should have seen what their destruction would lead to: diminished rights and needless wars. The only ones that should have felt any happiness from the WTC attacks are the war mongers.

It baffles me so I admit to suspecting that people just pretend they can't do it for appearances sake - so that other people won't rag on them for being "cold".
It's lack of empathy - one of the criteria for Antisocial personality disorder.
 
If I'm honest with myself (and anyone reading this) I admit to being somewhat spellbound by the spectacle of it all, in a very detached way.
Well, we must hang together, we psychopathic emotional cripples. If I'm so dead inside the why do I cry when I'm chopping up babies? Hmm?

I'm giving up on even trying to explain - I'm going for broke!!!
 
If I'm honest with myself (and anyone reading this) I admit to being somewhat spellbound by the spectacle of it all, in a very detached way.
That I can understand. It's still a long ways from saying "Ya!" as the towers fall.
 
Back
Top