Climate Change Under Predicted

2012 tied for the hottest year in Minnesota. Additionally, we had a drought the last half of the year. This year was fairly unique as 70% of our moisture came in the first 5 months of the year. Almost every year we see slightly more rain in the fall timeframe.

Talking about trends - Minnesota has seen warmer and shorter winters over the last 40 years. (Probably why I remember sledding and snowmobiling during Thanksgiving break and it hasn't been an option for my kids. Oldest is 6.)
 
2012 tied for the hottest year in Minnesota. Additionally, we had a drought the last half of the year. This year was fairly unique as 70% of our moisture came in the first 5 months of the year. Almost every year we see slightly more rain in the fall timeframe.

We had an unusually cold start to December, with a bit of snow and sub-zero temperatures for a week or so.
This was followed by a sudden, double-figure rise in temperatures, accompanied by a couple of weeks of extremely wet weather, with lots of flooding around the country.
About a week ago, the downpour started to let up but the temperatures have stayed well above average.

Hopefully it will dip again before too long because I'm hoping to get a wee bit of snowboarding in this winter.
 
7 a.m. this morning, Glasgow, 12 degrees celsius.
Same time 12 months ago it was about 30 degrees colder.
 
Australia adds new colours to heat map - purple and magenta:
http://www.cnet.com.au/bom-adds-new...er-map-for-record-heat-339342964.htm?feed=rss

weather_1.jpg


On 2 January 1960, Australia reached its highest-ever temperature (PDF): 50.7 degrees Celsius, in Oodnadatta, a small town toward the north of South Australia.
If the Bureau of Meteorology's (BOM) forecast is anything to go by, that record is about to get thumped off its throne. The heatwave coming over the next week looks to be so severe that BOM has added two new colours to the weather map — purple and magenta — to bring the top limit to 54 degrees Celsius to accommodate the rise.
However, although the weather is still heating up, BOM has added that it is only the most likely of a number of weather projections, telling The Sydney Morning Herald that it could be wrong. Head of climate monitoring Aaron Coutts-Smith told the newspaper, "The indications are, from the South Australian office, that we are not looking at getting anywhere near that [50-degree level]."


 


Yes, and the Chinese themselves apparently blame global warming:
The national meteorological administration said China is seeing dropping temperatures partly because of south-moving polar cold fronts, caused by melting polar ice from global warming. It said the air is moist and likely to dump heavy snow in China, Europe and North America.

The jet-stream moving South was one of the reasons given for the last couple of years of severe winters in the UK. Some also linked this to melting polar ice at the time.
 
@Robert,

These sorts of changes are why 'Climate Change' is the name to use. While the leading factor is a Warming it may, for relatively short times, push a cooling effect. If I recall one was the cold melting Greenland Ice sheet was predicted to cool the Atlantic current by Europe producing colder and snowier winters. It seems to make sense if increase the rate of cold water entered into a water system will stabilize that water system and impact the overall environment. It's a short lived event. When that cold water is gone (eg Ice sheet is no more) the rate the water heats up will increase quickly as there's no longer a moderating control.
 
@Robert,

These sorts of changes are why 'Climate Change' is the name to use.

Well, it is and it isn't.
On the one hand the climate is indeed changing.
On the other hand, the evidence tends to point towards the climate changing at least partly because of global warming.

I really don't mind too much which term you use; however, I usually prefer use global warming.
The reason for this is that the term, "climate change," is often used simply to appease idiots.
The type of idiots who are incapable of understanding (or perhaps unwilling to) that a highly unusual and extremely cold, local weather event is not only an entirely feasible outcome of warmer globe, but also a predictable one.
Even the idiots who made "The Day After Tomorrow" weren't *that* stupid:
the9h.jpg

;)

While the leading factor is a Warming it may, for relatively short times, push a cooling effect. If I recall one was the cold melting Greenland Ice sheet was predicted to cool the Atlantic current by Europe producing colder and snowier winters. It seems to make sense if increase the rate of cold water entered into a water system will stabilize that water system and impact the overall environment. It's a short lived event. When that cold water is gone (eg Ice sheet is no more) the rate the water heats up will increase quickly as there's no longer a moderating control.

Hmm... not too sure about the last part of that but you could well be correct.
 
For a bit of balance, it should also be pointed out the the UK Met Office has revised its predictions downwards.




http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/en...a-standstill-new-Met-Office-figures-show.html

View from the Independent:
There is a difference between weather and climate. Weather is what you see when you look out of the window; climate is the pattern that remains when day-to-day variations are set aside and the long-term average is considered. Weather is about events; climate is about trends. Climate is what we expect to see; weather is what we actually get.

The Met Office's revised predictions on medium-term climate change released this week have been seized upon by sceptics who insist that man-made global warming caused by excess CO2 in the atmosphere is an invention of over-zealous environmentalists. Global warming is "at a standstill", headlines have crowed, and the danger posed by greenhouse gases is more seriously questioned than ever. If only it were so simple.
What the Met Office's latest computer model actually says is that the global temperature may rise at a fractionally shallower rate over the coming five years than had been predicted. But we can still expect more above-average warmth than the world has experienced in the previous 50 years. Climate change is, then, no less of a grim reality than it was and there is no reason to conclude that it has "stalled".
 
Back
Top