Dammy you are wrong

Paul can't drop out. He's gotta stay in, in hopes he can win the VP nomination. If he's the only other playa he might just have a chance. The best way to get to the Presidency is through the Vice
 
Dammy said:
That's the only hope Obama has, the Tea Party folks stay at home rather then vote for a Socialist.
Click to expand...
Is Lyndon LaRaouche running again?

Problem is, Tea Party is scared that the Marxist will ruin their country beyond anyone's redemption if he is given another four years
Click to expand...
To rephrase - Yes the Tea Party's grip on reality is a fleeting accident, at best.

Tea Party has to make a decision on which Global Elite faction to back
Click to expand...
What?! You seem to think the Tea Party is some indepenent movement. Instead it's puppet libertarian group supported by Koch Bros and Fox News. In reality the Tea Party can't pick anyone. The Global Elites already picked them.
 
We have to get away from the bullshit 2 party system. It is complete bullshit. Obama is a total piece of shit. Romney is a total piece of shit
Click to expand...

Amen, brother!

This has been the case for a while. Gore was as big a piece of shit as GWB. Obama as big a piece of shit as McCain. It's not a recent problem. It just takes a while to recognize.

If you're not in the 0.001% and you think either of the two parties has your best interest in mind.... You're sadly delusional.
 
ilwrath said:
Gore was as big a piece of shit as GWB.
Click to expand...
I used to favour Gore because I believe that the rot would have been slower under him. However, slow rot would have been more of a problem because people would have had more time to adapt to it and wouldn't notice so much. With Cheney and his chimp at the helm that administration was so hamfisted and impatient it just rushed a lot of stuff - it was enough of a jolt to start waking people up.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
I used to favour Gore because I believe that the rot would have been slower under him. However, slow rot would have been more of a problem because people would have had more time to adapt to it and wouldn't notice so much.With Cheney and his chimp at the helm that administration was so hamfisted and impatient it just rushed a lot of stuff - it was enough of a jolt to start waking people up.
Click to expand...


Interesting view and, now that I think about it, I tend to agree but only up to a point (assuming you mean you're happier it worked out as it did - apologies if I'm overstating your position).
There are many hundreds of thousands of dead people who might still be alive had Gore won.
That's not to say he definitely wouldn't have done the same but it seems unlikely.
 
Robert said:
There are many hundreds of thousands of dead people who might still be alive had Gore won.
Click to expand...
It's so hard to say. Would he have just gone there in a more convincing way? Would it have just taken him longer to kill those people. remember that the president is really only the CEO whose job it is to carry out the will of the owners.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Soros was funding Ron Paul to make Romney the GOP candidate because Santorum so had a chance otherwise.
Click to expand...

More or less, that is pretty close to my thoughts. Romney is probably the closest GOP that can be elected that can be controlled by the Global Elite. Soros may not like some of Romney's policies, but he is more acceptable then someone from the Tea Party.

(Paul isn't drawing any votes from anyone. Paul brings his own votes to the party.)
Click to expand...

yeah, right.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Much of the Tea Party has been co-opted but a large percentage of them are Ron Paul supporters and were back when Ron Paul was throwing Tea Parties, before the Tea Party started.
Click to expand...

Pity Ron Paul was late to the Tea Party, but such is life.


If by Marxist you mean the Oligarchs ...
Click to expand...

No, I mean Marxist.
 
Robert said:
Interesting view and, now that I think about it, I tend to agree but only up to a point (assuming you mean you're happier it worked out as it did - apologies if I'm overstating your position).
There are many hundreds of thousands of dead people who might still be alive had Gore won.
That's not to say he definitely wouldn't have done the same but it seems unlikely.
Click to expand...

Or how many more additional hundreds of thousands would be dead.
 
Dammy said:
Pity Ron Paul was late to the Tea Party, but such is life.
Click to expand...
Ron Paul had his Tea Party protest December 19, 2007. Rick Santelli didn't launch his Tea Party until February 19, 2009 right on CNBC
Just before that on January 24, 2009 a fellow named Trevor Leach organized a Tea Party of his own in New York. Leach was the chairman of "Young Americans for Liberty" which is an offshoot of "Students for Ron Paul".
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Ron Paul had his Tea Party protest December 19, 2007. Rick Santelli didn't launch his Tea Party until February 19, 2009 right on CNBC
Just before that on January 24, 2009 a fellow named Trevor Leach organized a Tea Party of his own in New York. Leach was the chairman of "Young Americans for Liberty" which is an offshoot of "Students for Ron Paul".
Click to expand...

The theme of the Boston Tea Party has long been used by anti-tax protesters, including Ron Paul

The Tea Party Movement beginning is tied to Rick Santelli and Michelle Malkin
 
I used to favour Gore because I believe that the rot would have been slower under him. However, slow rot would have been more of a problem because people would have had more time to adapt to it and wouldn't notice so much. With Cheney and his chimp at the helm that administration was so hamfisted and impatient it just rushed a lot of stuff - it was enough of a jolt to start waking people up.
Click to expand...

Oh, I agree... It would have played out a bit differently had it been Gore. But ultimately we'd be in the same mess. It's the choice between a kick in the crotch and a punch to the kidney. Either way, we're getting the bad end of the deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top