- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Messages
- 7,710
- Reaction score
- 2,587
faethor said:@Red
A couple of items I've run across. Chinese made SUV, Zoyote, is coming to the USA. Roush is working on the electric only model. It's about Honda CRV sized. Estimated cost is $30K. Range is 150-200 miles between charges. Top speed is 70 MPH.
Ford's new electric charger for their plug-ins is 6.6kW and takes about 4 hours to charge your car. Twice as fast as the Nissan Leaf's charger at 3.3kW and 8 hours to charge. Nissan is supposedly going to upgrade their chargers.
Toyota is saying 10 new electric vehicles within the next 4 years. With "genuine driving excitment" -- which of course is a phrase I can only laugh at in association with any Toyota. Perhaps they've stolen enough Fuji Heavy Industries tech (aka Subaru).
redrumloa said:Sad, but predicted by me. I have long argued with a friend of mine that the price is simply way too high for the Volt. I don't know what they were thinking, nor my friend. I had higher hopes for the Leaf, but even that price is too high. The leaf was advertised all along as being an affordable car. First they hinted it would be sub $20k, then they stated it would be about $24,000. Last I checked they are about $33,000 in the dealer. Anyone with a brain will factor in the cost of not just the increased electric bill, but the periodic battery pack replacement. It simply is not worth it unless you are rich, at this point.
faethor said:It appears Nissan is keeping most Leafs in Japan rather than ship them to the US. Also, the recent tsunami is expected to impact Leaf production and sales within the US and within Japan.
cybereye said:I am this friend that Redrumloa talk about this electric car, the Volts. The big picture is what we can agree, but the finer detail is what we do not agree nor are we talking about two different subjects within the big picture. We are stuck with the subject as ROI for MPGe. I do agree that Volts cost too high cause of the battery and I also knew leaf is way too low to sell the car.
cybereye said:EPA should start looking at energy efficiency, not energy usage. MPGe is a measure of the average distance traveled per “unit of energy” consumed. That “unit of energy” is in which 33.7 kilowatt hours of electricity is equivalent to one gallon of gasoline
Coal is fairly close to a car around 30%. A car is 25-35%. Natural Gas is much better towards 50%. A modern hydroelectric can be even higher towards 90%, though our older plants are probably close to the 70% range.metalman said:The Leaf carries a 24-kwh battery pack. A 50-mile one-way drive depletes the pack so much that the charge timer on the dash predicts a 34hr charge lvl 1 charge time or 6hr lvl 2 charge. Nissan recommends their charger. This takes about 8 hours to charge the vehicle. Ford's charger is about 4 hours to charge as it charges at a faster rate.
You would have to include the energy efficiency of the electrical plant your getting electricity from.
Its not more efficient in energy usage, its just using a more abundant or cheaper source, nuclear, coal or hydro
faethor said:Coal is fairly close to a car around 30%. A car is 25-35%. Natural Gas is much better towards 50%. A modern hydroelectric can be even higher towards 90%, though our older plants are probably close to the 70% range.metalman said:The Leaf carries a 24-kwh battery pack. A 50-mile one-way drive depletes the pack so much that the charge timer on the dash predicts a 34hr charge lvl 1 charge time or 6hr lvl 2 charge. Nissan recommends their charger. This takes about 8 hours to charge the vehicle. Ford's charger is about 4 hours to charge as it charges at a faster rate.
You would have to include the energy efficiency of the electrical plant your getting electricity from.
Its not more efficient in energy usage, its just using a more abundant or cheaper source, nuclear, coal or hydro
And isn't there more than 'energy efficency' to know? Almost all power plants capture pollutants better than automobiles. And there's the need to get energy to the source of generation. So there is also efficency of pollution cleaning and efficency of energy delivery systems. In the energy delivery systems we have gas that needs to be delivered to every town, gas cars, or coal to the local plant which powers many towns, or water is right there and doesn't get delivered. Each of those produces their own pollutants and own costs.
FluffyMcDeath said:If all subsidies were removed for coal and gas and roads etc, I suspect we'd all be getting around on electric trains but incentives are in place to change behaviour and while there are those who favour incentivising electric vehicles with tax breaks there are others who seem to be intent on de-incentivising with extra fees. For example in Washington state, there is a move afoot to place surcharges on electric cars to make up for lost gas tax revenue.
metalman said:Drive 50 miles, wait 34 hours to drive another 50 miles.
metalman said:cybereye said:EPA should start looking at energy efficiency, not energy usage. MPGe is a measure of the average distance traveled per “unit of energy” consumed. That “unit of energy” is in which 33.7 kilowatt hours of electricity is equivalent to one gallon of gasoline
You would have to include the energy efficiency of the electrical plant your getting electricity from.
cybereye said:We are stuck with the subject as ROI for MPGe. I do agree that Volts cost too high cause of the battery and I also knew leaf is way too low to sell the car."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-0 ... sting.htmlTony Posawatz said:“A sample of our early Volt customers suggest that they drive 1,000 miles before they fill up the gas tank,”
So 1000 miles divide by 44 would take 22 gallon of diesel. The total 22 gallon of diesel is $76.78 and the volt 9 gallon gas tank is $38.25. He would have save $38.53 out of 1000 miles driven. I use cheapest VW fuel with highway miles vs. Chevy highest fuel with short range on electric for handicap. That seems great in the long run. You know fuel is never fix price and price always go up in the long runs.redrumloa said:Abysmal! Are you kidding me??? My non-hybrid VW gets 38/44 and cost less than half the price of a Volt. Pathetic! I spit on GM management!
cybereye said:That seems to be very good ROI on the car base on the MPG. Redrumloa’s car is not even close to beating that. I would like to see what the ratios that able to get that numbers are out of all the Chevy Volt out there.
redrumloa said:Consumers who don’t regularly drive very far can plug in the car to recharge and won’t use much fuel.
That does not mean free of cost. You still associate plugging in with free driving. To figure true MPGe you have to calculate the actually cost of kWh being used for for battery recharging compared to range driven. With such a large draw you also have to consider possible demand charges. This cost is not negligible, it is a real cost.
Finally you have to consider the cost of battery replacement every couple of years The Volt is a POS.