- Joined
- Nov 16, 2011
- Messages
- 3,692
- Reaction score
- 863
lol... bye... wont miss you at all
lol... bye... wont miss you at all
Do Hispanics make you uncomfortable?
Do Jews make you uncomfortable?
Fred Phelps has run for office in various Democratic Party primaries five times. In primary races for governor in 1990, 1994, and 1998, receiving about 15 percent of the vote in 1998. In the 1992 Democratic Party primary for U.S. Senate, Phelps received 31 percent of the vote. Phelps ran for mayor of Topeka in 1993 and 1997. Members of the Westboro Baptist Church helped run Gore's 1988 Presidential campaign in Kansas. Phelps' son, Fred Phelps Jr., hosted a Gore fund raiser at his home in Topeka and was a Gore delegate to the 1988 Democratic National Convention.
So grateful for that support was Gore, Phelps said, that four years later, in 1992, Phelps was provided tickets to the inauguration of President Clinton. Phelps was also sent tickets to the 1996 inauguration.
You could have said "no", but for some reason you chose not to. That's interesting.
I think you set yourself up for "demonizing" when you decided to play pretend that Reverend Wright had anything to do with those Westboro Baptist morons. If you were fair about both sides you would have responded with something more along the lines of "The Westboro Baptists are equally despicable as Rev. Wright" or something along those lines, but instead you decided to turn it around and make it look, once again, as if Rev. Wright is the only bad guy - second only to Obama of course.
As for my injection of race, it was a question to you. And I ask it because when you go to such lengths to demonize someone on such trivial grounds there tends to be some kind of irrational thought process involved. Perhaps your hate for Obama has nothing to do with race but it certainly is an issue for some people. I guess I was foolish to expect an honest answer.
Funny thing about those "controversial" positions is that they aren't actually controversial. I've noticed that it is part of the right wing PR technique to label uncontroversial things controversial simply to try to convince people that they are somehow controversial so as to undermine them. Knowing that people don't have the time to explore all ideas, if you disparage the ideas you don't like then you discourage people from exploring those ideas and therefore don';t have to defend your own indefensible ideas. It's why the religious right disparage Harry Potter and why the Catholic Church disparaged The Davinci Code. If the faithful don't read them then no need to answer the awkward questions raised.
In a similar vein, reading of the Bible is discouraged by the use of preachers who will deliver the carefully selected, sanitized portions to the faithful thus discouraging them from reading the whole thing for themselves as they imagine they are already getting the complete story. Information control is power.
this site points out that "Conservapedia includes obviously photoshopped pictures of Gore with Phelps. In truth, the two have never met."
Which rule is it and why does that excuse you for avoiding answering the question - which you could still now answer but continue to avoid.Another example of Saul Alwinsky's Rules for Radicals.
Hmm. Ridicule, eh? That's Alinsky's #5, isn't it.Nice spin job.
Which rule is it and why does that excuse you for avoiding answering the question - which you could still now answer but continue to avoid.
So you continue to refuse to deny the suggestion. You should be a politician. They always deflect and redirect when they can't answer a question.Perfect example of Saul Alinsky's: “Pick the target, freeze it, personal it, and polarize it.” That is what you are attempting to do to me, but it's not going to work. I don't mind trading barbs back and forth Fluffy, but I do find what you and others are trying to do to me by even suggesting racism completely disgusting, revolting, and I resent your attempt to demean my character in such a fashion.
that's my view of that unbelievable moron, santorum. He's very entertaining in a horrifying way.Listening to him doesn't mean you agree with him
Even the part where he claims to love Jesus?I've watched them both now (finally) and I can't disagree.
well, jesus is make believe so it hardly mattersEven the part where he claims to love Jesus?