McCain's VP choice

I was thinking that her primary asset was behind her, as McCain also apparently observed. Other than being corrupt and quick to lie and befuddled with bronze aged beliefs I couldn't see what made her particularly qualified but now we have photographic evidence of her patriotism!!!
Flag pic
 
I was thinking that her primary asset was behind her, as McCain also apparently observed. Other than being corrupt and quick to lie and befuddled with bronze aged beliefs I couldn't see what made her particularly qualified but now we have photographic evidence of her patriotism!!!
Flag pic
 
I was thinking that her primary asset was behind her, as McCain also apparently observed. Other than being corrupt and quick to lie and befuddled with bronze aged beliefs I couldn't see what made her particularly qualified but now we have photographic evidence of her patriotism!!!
Flag pic
 
I was thinking that her primary asset was behind her, as McCain also apparently observed. Other than being corrupt and quick to lie and befuddled with bronze aged beliefs I couldn't see what made her particularly qualified but now we have photographic evidence of her patriotism!!!
Flag pic
 
I was thinking that her primary asset was behind her, as McCain also apparently observed. Other than being corrupt and quick to lie and befuddled with bronze aged beliefs I couldn't see what made her particularly qualified but now we have photographic evidence of her patriotism!!!
Flag pic
 
I was thinking that her primary asset was behind her, as McCain also apparently observed. Other than being corrupt and quick to lie and befuddled with bronze aged beliefs I couldn't see what made her particularly qualified but now we have photographic evidence of her patriotism!!!
Flag pic
 
Glaucus said:
Robert said:
Personally, I struggle to understand how anyone capable of thought can be anything other than Agnostic or Atheist but just because someone believes in an absurdly preposterous faerie story, wouldn't stop me voting for them.
Click to expand...
Really? I'm as eager to vote for someone who believes in fictional fairy tales as someone who's been locked in a rubber room for 30 years. Personally, I'd prefer someone who's capable of free thought and can demonstrate it. A brainwashed religious nut doesn't fit that category.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean but that would rule out voting for anyone from a major party in my country.
 
Glaucus said:
Robert said:
Personally, I struggle to understand how anyone capable of thought can be anything other than Agnostic or Atheist but just because someone believes in an absurdly preposterous faerie story, wouldn't stop me voting for them.
Click to expand...
Really? I'm as eager to vote for someone who believes in fictional fairy tales as someone who's been locked in a rubber room for 30 years. Personally, I'd prefer someone who's capable of free thought and can demonstrate it. A brainwashed religious nut doesn't fit that category.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean but that would rule out voting for anyone from a major party in my country.
 
Glaucus said:
Robert said:
Personally, I struggle to understand how anyone capable of thought can be anything other than Agnostic or Atheist but just because someone believes in an absurdly preposterous faerie story, wouldn't stop me voting for them.
Click to expand...
Really? I'm as eager to vote for someone who believes in fictional fairy tales as someone who's been locked in a rubber room for 30 years. Personally, I'd prefer someone who's capable of free thought and can demonstrate it. A brainwashed religious nut doesn't fit that category.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean but that would rule out voting for anyone from a major party in my country.
 
Glaucus said:
Robert said:
Personally, I struggle to understand how anyone capable of thought can be anything other than Agnostic or Atheist but just because someone believes in an absurdly preposterous faerie story, wouldn't stop me voting for them.
Click to expand...
Really? I'm as eager to vote for someone who believes in fictional fairy tales as someone who's been locked in a rubber room for 30 years. Personally, I'd prefer someone who's capable of free thought and can demonstrate it. A brainwashed religious nut doesn't fit that category.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean but that would rule out voting for anyone from a major party in my country.
 
Glaucus said:
Robert said:
Personally, I struggle to understand how anyone capable of thought can be anything other than Agnostic or Atheist but just because someone believes in an absurdly preposterous faerie story, wouldn't stop me voting for them.
Click to expand...
Really? I'm as eager to vote for someone who believes in fictional fairy tales as someone who's been locked in a rubber room for 30 years. Personally, I'd prefer someone who's capable of free thought and can demonstrate it. A brainwashed religious nut doesn't fit that category.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean but that would rule out voting for anyone from a major party in my country.
 
Glaucus said:
Robert said:
Personally, I struggle to understand how anyone capable of thought can be anything other than Agnostic or Atheist but just because someone believes in an absurdly preposterous faerie story, wouldn't stop me voting for them.
Click to expand...
Really? I'm as eager to vote for someone who believes in fictional fairy tales as someone who's been locked in a rubber room for 30 years. Personally, I'd prefer someone who's capable of free thought and can demonstrate it. A brainwashed religious nut doesn't fit that category.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean but that would rule out voting for anyone from a major party in my country.
 
redrumloa said:
Robert said:
This type of hypocrisy can be found in all the other major religions too. The sad thing is the perpetrators are oblivious to it, which is where the absurdity comes in.
Click to expand...

You mean the hypocracy of the athiest religon?
Click to expand...

Hypocrisy? 'Atheist religion'?

You'll have to elaborate, since 'atheist religion' is an oxymoron.

You appear to have no idea what the word 'atheist' actually means.

Here is a hint:
If you are catholic, you are atheist - to all religions except catholicism.
If you are jewish, you are atheist - to all religions except judaism.
If you are muslim, you are atheist - to all religions except islam.
If you are atheist, you just believe in one less religion than any of the above.
Atheism simply means a lack of belief in a deity. It does not necessarily mean belief that there cannot be a deity of any kind.
Perhaps you see this as a subtle difference but it is a very important one.
 
redrumloa said:
Robert said:
This type of hypocrisy can be found in all the other major religions too. The sad thing is the perpetrators are oblivious to it, which is where the absurdity comes in.
Click to expand...

You mean the hypocracy of the athiest religon?
Click to expand...

Hypocrisy? 'Atheist religion'?

You'll have to elaborate, since 'atheist religion' is an oxymoron.

You appear to have no idea what the word 'atheist' actually means.

Here is a hint:
If you are catholic, you are atheist - to all religions except catholicism.
If you are jewish, you are atheist - to all religions except judaism.
If you are muslim, you are atheist - to all religions except islam.
If you are atheist, you just believe in one less religion than any of the above.
Atheism simply means a lack of belief in a deity. It does not necessarily mean belief that there cannot be a deity of any kind.
Perhaps you see this as a subtle difference but it is a very important one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top