I really wish it would mean the rich would get taxed. But sadly, it doesn't look like it
The Reedy Creek Improvement District collects about $105 million a year to operate services inside Reedy Creek, according to Randolph. So Disney, in effect, taxes itself for such things as operating its own power plant, maintaining roads and providing fire protection.
"This is on top of other taxing authorities it sets in," Randolph said as part of a series of tweets he posted on this issue. "So Disney pays the same Orange County, local and state school taxes, etc., as all other properties inside Orange County. If Reedy Creek goes away, the $105 million it collects to operate services goes away. That doesn’t just transfer to Orange County, because it’s an independent taxing district. However, Orange County then inherits all debt and obligations with no extra funds."
That makes it sound like the changes would save Disney $105 million a year AND consequently Disney may have to scale back its business. That doesn't make a lot of sense. Did Disney write this?I really wish it would mean the rich would get taxed. But sadly, it doesn't look like it
DeSantis dissolves Disney’s Reedy Creek district. What it means for Florida counties, taxpayers
Orlando-area counties like Orange and Osceola face potential impacts from Gov. Ron DeSantis' dissolution of Disney's Reedy Creek Improvement District.finance.yahoo.com
That makes it sound like the changes would save Disney $105 million a year AND consequently Disney may have to scale back its business. That doesn't make a lot of sense. Did Disney write this?
I don't give a rat's behind about disney.That makes it sound like the changes would save Disney $105 million a year AND consequently Disney may have to scale back its business. That doesn't make a lot of sense. Did Disney write this?
Disney operates like a county government, building and maintaining municipal services like electricity, water and roads, and providing police and fire protection. It even taxes itself. The setup was intended to give Disney autonomy while also relieving the counties of paying for new services and infrastructure in what was once a remote and rural area.
"homeowners here could see property taxes jump by 20% to make up the difference. And even then, it probably wouldn't be enough to cover all the money that would be lost."
"Disney was in charge of ambulance services and fire services," reports WMFE's Prieur. "So if someone has a heart attack or a car accident, now it's up to the county to figure out how to handle that — and how to foot the bill.
I'm not even suggesting that the situation that was created in 1968 should just continue. But if they are going to change they shouldn't be shafting the people who live there. In this battle between corporation and government the losers are the public
it seems to me this is a problem that doesn't actually existDisney's change in politics towards kids
It's not the gay. The "gay" is total misdirection. It is the ideology that your sex is all a social construct, that it's all in your head and your "gender" is real. That males can be women if they say so (no-one much cares about FTM) and that what colour you are determines your personality and moral worth, and that teachers should be able to have sexual conversations with very young children and that schools should be able to keep anything that goes on between children and teachers and even the curriculum secret from parents. People would feel uncomfortable about this if it was happening in Christian churchs, they should feel equally uncomfortable when any other religions claim these rights too (and "critical" theories are religious faiths).it seems to me this is a problem that doesn't actually exist
the only thing disney is trying to get kids to do is watch their films, buy their products and go to their amusement parks.
There is no such thing as "grooming" kids to be gay in Grammar school. As friends who happen t be gay have pointed out, THEY were "groomed" to be straight and that just never worked.
but we agree that desantis reaction is most definitely spiteful. MY issue is that disney will not be harmed. Regular people will. That really isn't very good leadership.
When the state established the Reedy Creek Improvement District in 1967 as an independent taxing district controlled by Walt Disney World, it gave it the power to build roads, sewers and utilities as well as the authority to set its zoning laws, establish its police and fire departments, and regulate its construction. The district can borrow money by issuing bonds to pay for services and that infrastructure and, while Disney must also pay property taxes to Orange and Osceola counties, the state also allows the Reedy Creek Improvement District to tax itself. The current tax rate is three times higher than the maximum amount allowed by cities and counties, Schumer said. Proponents of the bill “had some misconception that Disney’s getting some special property tax break for Reedy Creek,’’ said Scott Randolph, Orange County tax collector. “It’s not.”
Personally, I don't care. I refuse to tell other people how they should feel about themselves.It is the ideology that your sex is all a social construct, that it's all in your head and your "gender" is real.