Space Stuff

SpaceX says its BFR will fly someone around the Moon. We have questions.
Warning: Wild speculation in this story.
BFS1-800x457.jpg

Concept illustration of the Big Falcon Spaceship flying around the Moon.
On Thursday evening, without any advance notice, SpaceX tweeted that is had signed the world’s "first private passenger to fly around the Moon aboard our BFR launch vehicle." Moreover, the company promised to reveal "who's flying and why" on Monday, September 17. The announcement will take place at the company's headquarters in Hawthorne, Calif.

There were only two other clues—tweets from Elon Musk himself. Was the rendering of the Big Falcon Spaceship in SpaceX's tweet new? Yes, Musk said. And was he the passenger? In response to this, the founder of SpaceX simply tweeted a Japanese flag emoji. This would seem to be strong clue that the passenger is from Japan. Or maybe Musk was enjoying the epic Seven Samurai movie at that moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
Revealed: The billionaire baron who’ll ride Elon’s thrusting erection to the Moon and back

yusaku_maezawa.jpg

Yusaku Maezawa ... Biz baron is going to lead the ultimate artist's retreat

SpaceX today named its first paying passenger it will fly around the Moon and back to Earth – and it's Japanese biz baron Yusaku Maezawa. Yeah, him. You know. Him.

“SpaceX has signed the world’s first private passenger to fly around the Moon aboard our BFR launch vehicle — an important step toward enabling access for everyday people who dream of traveling to space,” Elon’s Muskeers teased on Friday ahead of Monday night's big reveal.

The trip will be made using SpaceX’s BFR: its Big Falcon Rocket (or Big F**king Rocket, depending on how much someone's been smoking). In a webcast in the past hour, SpaceX supremo Elon Musk revealed that the passenger is none other than Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa, and the flight will hopefully take place by 2023 at the latest.

Maezawa made his estimated $2.7bn with the online clothing firm Start Today, and is a keen patron of the arts. He wants to do a circuit of the Moon, and take six to eight artists with him – be they painters, sculptors, musicians, or architects – and in return for the trip they must create art to inspire humanity.
 
The math of why it’s so hard to build a spherical Death Star in space
In his book Math With Bad Drawings, Ben Orlin connects abstract math with reality.
deathstarTOP1200-800x533.jpg

Geometry puts some real design constraints on Darth Vader's desire for a spherical Death Star.
Opting to build the Death Star in the shape of a sphere may not have been classic Star Wars villain Darth Vader's wisest move, according to math teacher Ben Orlin.
 
Ice volcanoes have likely been erupting for billions of years on Ceres
The one cryovolcano we can see now is joined by dozens of extinct ones.
AhunaMonsCeres_Dawn_960-800x450.jpg

Ahuna Mons, a likely cryovolcano.

All of the bodies in our Solar System started out hot, with energy built up by their gravitational collapse and subsequent bombardment. Radioactivity then contributed further heating. For a planet like Earth, that has kept the interior hot enough to sustain plate tectonics. Smaller bodies like Mars and the Moon, however, have cooled and gone geologically silent. That set the expectations for the dwarf planets, which were thought to be cold and dead.

Pluto, however, turned out to be anything but. It turns out that water and nitrogen ices need far less energy input to participate in active geology, and radioactive decay and sporadic collisions seem to be enough to sustain it. Which brings us to Ceres, a dwarf planet that is the largest body in the asteroid belt. The Dawn spacecraft identified an unusual peak called Ahuna Mons that some have suggested is a cryovolcano, erupting viscous water ice. But why would Ceres only have enough energy to support a single volcano?

A new paper suggests it doesn't. Instead, there may be more than two dozen cryovolcanoes on Ceres' surface. We just haven't spotted them because geology on the dwarf planet didn't stop when the cryovolcanoes stopped erupting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
The math of why it’s so hard to build a spherical Death Star in space
In his book Math With Bad Drawings, Ben Orlin connects abstract math with reality.
deathstarTOP1200-800x533.jpg

Geometry puts some real design constraints on Darth Vader's desire for a spherical Death Star.
Opting to build the Death Star in the shape of a sphere may not have been classic Star Wars villain Darth Vader's wisest move, according to math teacher Ben Orlin.
For any given volumne, if you wan't to minimise the surface area enclosing it then you end up with a sphere. If you have a pressurized container it will naturally tend to become spherical if it can. The force from internal pressure will dwarf gravity but you end up with the same shape. Trying to stop the structure from becoming spherical would mean having to use more and stiffer material. Trying to cover a non-spherical shape with a tough outer skin would mean using more material to skin the same volume.
 
For any given volumne, if you wan't to minimise the surface area enclosing it then you end up with a sphere. If you have a pressurized container it will naturally tend to become spherical if it can. The force from internal pressure will dwarf gravity but you end up with the same shape. Trying to stop the structure from becoming spherical would mean having to use more and stiffer material. Trying to cover a non-spherical shape with a tough outer skin would mean using more material to skin the same volume.

Indeed, while I found the article interesting I also found the Death Star example a poor choice. At one point he goes on about the aerodynamics of a sphere. I'm not the biggest Star Wars fan in the world but I'm pretty sure it never entered a planetary atmosphere at any point.
 
China appears to be accelerating development of a super-heavy lift rocket
The Long March 9 rocket would be on par with the Saturn V booster.
GettyImages-996594594-800x534.jpg

A Long March-2C rocket carrying two satellites is launched at the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center on July 9, 2018 in Jiuquan, Gansu Province of China.

As part of its long-term planning, Chinese rocket officials have talked for some time about a super-heavy lift rocket that will enable a human lunar program. For this rocket, called the Long March 9, officials have generally cited the 2030 time frame for its maiden launch.

However, at the World Conference on Science Literacy 2018 this week, an engineer with the China National Space Administration, Li Guoping, said the country planned to launch the Long March 9 booster in 2028. This comes as China has successfully ramped up its launch cadence in 2018—it should launch about three dozen orbital rockets this year, more than any other country. The report in the Chinese news service Xinhua did not specify why this larger rocket was now expected to launch two years earlier than previously announced.
 
Bouncing robots land on asteroid 180m miles away amid mission to fetch sample for Earth
Second time lucky for Japan after first try proved a bust
jaxa_rover.jpg

ROVER-1A and 1B (top and bottom) and ROVER-2 (middle right) on Ryugu : JAXA artist impression

The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has landed a pair of tiny drum-like hopping robots on the surface of asteroid Ryugu.

The cylindrical bots are about 18cm wide and 7cm tall (7 x 2.8in), and were traveling onboard the Hayabusa2 spacecraft, which left Earth in December 2014.

When the probe reached the right spot several hours ago, the robots, encased in a container called MINERVA-II1, were allowed to slowly free-fall to the asteroid’s surface. The rock is roughly 180 million miles from Earth, and it takes about 16 minutes for a radio signal to clear that distance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
Exciting times...
Get ready for a flood of new exoplanets: TESS has already spotted two
We look at the design of NASA's latest planet hunter and why it was made that way.
tess_6-800x476.jpg

NASA's successor to the Kepler mission, the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), is already paying dividends. The satellite was only launched in April and spent time undergoing commissioning and calibration. But it has now started its science mission, and researchers have already discovered two new planets.

These are expected to be the first of as many as 10,000 planets spotted by TESS. So we thought this was a good opportunity to take a careful look at the planet hunter's design, the goals that informed the design, and what its success should mean for our understanding of exoplanets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
Bouncing robots land on asteroid 180m miles away amid mission to fetch sample for Earth
Second time lucky for Japan after first try proved a bust
jaxa_rover.jpg

ROVER-1A and 1B (top and bottom) and ROVER-2 (middle right) on Ryugu : JAXA artist impression

The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has landed a pair of tiny drum-like hopping robots on the surface of asteroid Ryugu.

The cylindrical bots are about 18cm wide and 7cm tall (7 x 2.8in), and were traveling onboard the Hayabusa2 spacecraft, which left Earth in December 2014.

When the probe reached the right spot several hours ago, the robots, encased in a container called MINERVA-II1, were allowed to slowly free-fall to the asteroid’s surface. The rock is roughly 180 million miles from Earth, and it takes about 16 minutes for a radio signal to clear that distance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
Good news: Sub-surface life on Mars possible, moons from big impacts. There is no bad news
Yippee, it's a double whammy of Red Planet research
mars.jpg

In a double dose of Martian research, scientists believe that the planet once had the right environmental conditions to support life underground and its moons may have been born from an ancient collision.

Deep life
NASA boffins are increasingly convinced that the best chances for finding microbial life on Mars is under the surface, and new research backs that up.

“We showed, based on basic physics and chemistry calculations, that the ancient Martian subsurface likely had enough dissolved hydrogen to power a global subsurface biosphere," Jesse Tarnas, lead author of a paper published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters and a graduate student at Brown University in the US, on Monday. "Conditions in this habitable zone would have been similar to places on Earth where underground life exists."
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
After a decade of testing, propylene rocket fuel may be ready for prime time
Vector has received a patent for its liquid oxygen-propylene rocket engine.
Vector-R-B0.001_P19H-FT-1A-2017-05-03_302-800x565.jpg

In May, Vector launched a full-scale prototype of the Vector-R rocket.

For a long time Rocket Propellant-1, or RP-1, reigned supreme as the fuel of choice for the first stage of rockets. This highly refined form of kerosene, which was derived from jet fuel, powered the Saturn, Delta, Atlas, Soyuz rockets throughout the 20th century. It even served as fuel for modern rockets like the Falcon 9.

RP-1 has the benefit of being dense, which means a lot of fuel can be packed into a relatively small tank. However, RP-1 isn't the most efficient fuel, a measurement known as specific impulse. Liquid hydrogen, by contrast, has a really high specific impulse. But because it is not at all dense, it can't efficiently be used as a first stage fuel.

This is one reason why a number of major new rocket engines developed during the last decade, including SpaceX's Raptor and Blue Origin's BE-4 engines, have been designed to use methane as a fuel. It represents a compromise between RP-1 and hydrogen—not quite as dense as the former, and with not quite as high a specific impulse as the latter. Methane is also useful if you want to go to Mars, because it is relatively abundant in the red planet's thin atmosphere and could be used to refuel an ascent vehicle.

However a long-time rocket scientist named John Garvey believes there is another viable fuel for rockets, propylene, and he has been working with it for more than a decade. After Garvey co-founded Vector in late 2015 along with Jim Cantrell and Eric Besnard, he got a chance to put his propylene fuel into action for a real orbital rocket.

And now, he says, propylene has proven itself. Vector has received a patent for its liquid oxygen-propylene rocket engine and is nearing the first flight of its orbital Vector-R rocket, which is powered by three of these engines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
NASA to celebrate 55th anniversary of first Moon landing by, er, deciding how to land humans on the Moon again
In 2024, boffins realise a Saturn V is parked outside Houston
dark_side_of_the_moon.jpg

US space agency NASA published its long awaited National Space Exploration Campaign Report this week, and it makes for sobering reading for those still recovering from its 60th birthday celebrations.

The report (PDF) was in response to the 2017’s NASA Authorisation Act (PDF) and is a little late. NASA does specialise in delays, so the fact the roadmap is only little tardy is something to cheer about. The report does not make cheery reading for those recalling the promises of the eras of the presidencies of George Bush and Barack Obama.

NASA currently has five distinct space exploration goals: to hand over low earth orbit (LEO) operations to commercial entities; build capabilities to support lunar surface operations; send prospecting robots to the Moon; get some more boot-prints in lunar dust; and finally demonstrate how humans might get to Mars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adz
A Japanese company has announced a long-term plan to develop the Moon
"Around 2030 we expect to begin developing propellant and sending it to spacecraft."

On Wednesday, a Japanese company called ispace announced that it has two missions planned to the Moon within the next three years and that it has acquired ride-share launches on two Falcon 9 rockets to carry out those flights. The company's founder, Takeshi Hakamada, also said he has a long-term vision to have a city on the Moon visited by 10,000 people a year by 2040. (aye, right! :rolleyes:)

If this all sounds a little too ambitious, well, welcome to the world of aerospace, which is always heavy on promotion and big ideas. And we like that. NASA didn't land on the Moon because it was timid. However, we also feel compelled to bring at least a splash of realism to the conversation.
 
Back
Top