John Rogers said:
"You bring them in the world unwanted, unloved, you send them to the electric chair."
He wasn't saying that's what he does, or what should be done, but was addressing the Republican side of the house in the Alabama legislature. His point is pretty clear and not complicated. This is a decades old debate and we've talked about it before. There is a pro-life section of the populace (often religious) that are all for saving babies, and killing adults, anti-abortion but pro-death penalty. They have the moral argument that babies are innocent and criminals aren't (even though DNA shows many death row inmates are innocent), but there are further consequences that also result in suffering and death from insisting on birth for every embryo).
In a certain way pro-lifers are just like liberal bleeding hearts in that they call for an obvious good (saving babies, helping refugees, helping the poor, disaster relief etc), but they want other people to bear the cost. This is particularly cruel when the conditions of life are hard, incomes are low and you can't send your children out to work when they are 5, and especially where the child is only barely viable - who will require intensive permanent care imposing financial burdens on parents (or a parent) who can't manage it all to prolong a life that may not even be worth living.