Tom Cruise Is At It Again...Thetans Are Amoung Us!

[Glaucus]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Most atheists would say the opposite. Regardless, I saw the movie and thought it was pretty good - even though I'm an atheist.

- Mike

 

[Glaucus]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Most atheists would say the opposite. Regardless, I saw the movie and thought it was pretty good - even though I'm an atheist.

- Mike

 

[Glaucus]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Most atheists would say the opposite. Regardless, I saw the movie and thought it was pretty good - even though I'm an atheist.

- Mike

 

[Glaucus]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Most atheists would say the opposite. Regardless, I saw the movie and thought it was pretty good - even though I'm an atheist.

- Mike

 

[Glaucus]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Most atheists would say the opposite. Regardless, I saw the movie and thought it was pretty good - even though I'm an atheist.

- Mike

 

[Glaucus]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Most atheists would say the opposite. Regardless, I saw the movie and thought it was pretty good - even though I'm an atheist.

- Mike

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Reference South Park -- Trapped in the closet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYxQyRvHOWg

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Thanks for the link Faethor. I was making an attempt at sarcasm but the link you provided will be useful for anyone who didn't catch the "closet reference".

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Reference South Park -- Trapped in the closet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYxQyRvHOWg

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Thanks for the link Faethor. I was making an attempt at sarcasm but the link you provided will be useful for anyone who didn't catch the "closet reference".

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Reference South Park -- Trapped in the closet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYxQyRvHOWg

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Thanks for the link Faethor. I was making an attempt at sarcasm but the link you provided will be useful for anyone who didn't catch the "closet reference".

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Reference South Park -- Trapped in the closet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYxQyRvHOWg

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Thanks for the link Faethor. I was making an attempt at sarcasm but the link you provided will be useful for anyone who didn't catch the "closet reference".

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Reference South Park -- Trapped in the closet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYxQyRvHOWg

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Thanks for the link Faethor. I was making an attempt at sarcasm but the link you provided will be useful for anyone who didn't catch the "closet reference".

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[ltstanfo]

@ltstanfo

Reference South Park -- Trapped in the closet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYxQyRvHOWg

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Thanks for the link Faethor. I was making an attempt at sarcasm but the link you provided will be useful for anyone who didn't catch the "closet reference".

Regards,
Ltstanfo

 

[faethor]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Assuming the Bible is historically accurate that point is true. But do not mistake PotC as a historical documentary. If you're looking for biblical accuracies you'll be hard pressed to find it there as the movie goes beyond events protrayed in the Bible, those are but conjecture. Sometimes PotC is inconsistent with the way the Bible protrayed events. The most I can assign the movie as accuracy is the theological perspective of Mel. PotC in many ways is historically inaccurate and in others cannot be verified if it is or isn't accurate.

 

[faethor]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Assuming the Bible is historically accurate that point is true. But do not mistake PotC as a historical documentary. If you're looking for biblical accuracies you'll be hard pressed to find it there as the movie goes beyond events protrayed in the Bible, those are but conjecture. Sometimes PotC is inconsistent with the way the Bible protrayed events. The most I can assign the movie as accuracy is the theological perspective of Mel. PotC in many ways is historically inaccurate and in others cannot be verified if it is or isn't accurate.

 

[faethor]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Assuming the Bible is historically accurate that point is true. But do not mistake PotC as a historical documentary. If you're looking for biblical accuracies you'll be hard pressed to find it there as the movie goes beyond events protrayed in the Bible, those are but conjecture. Sometimes PotC is inconsistent with the way the Bible protrayed events. The most I can assign the movie as accuracy is the theological perspective of Mel. PotC in many ways is historically inaccurate and in others cannot be verified if it is or isn't accurate.

 

[faethor]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Assuming the Bible is historically accurate that point is true. But do not mistake PotC as a historical documentary. If you're looking for biblical accuracies you'll be hard pressed to find it there as the movie goes beyond events protrayed in the Bible, those are but conjecture. Sometimes PotC is inconsistent with the way the Bible protrayed events. The most I can assign the movie as accuracy is the theological perspective of Mel. PotC in many ways is historically inaccurate and in others cannot be verified if it is or isn't accurate.

 

[faethor]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Assuming the Bible is historically accurate that point is true. But do not mistake PotC as a historical documentary. If you're looking for biblical accuracies you'll be hard pressed to find it there as the movie goes beyond events protrayed in the Bible, those are but conjecture. Sometimes PotC is inconsistent with the way the Bible protrayed events. The most I can assign the movie as accuracy is the theological perspective of Mel. PotC in many ways is historically inaccurate and in others cannot be verified if it is or isn't accurate.

 

[faethor]

At least Tom Cruise isn't using his Directorial power to encourage snuff films ala Mel Gibson.

Jesus was crucified on a cross, that is history not fantasy.

Assuming the Bible is historically accurate that point is true. But do not mistake PotC as a historical documentary. If you're looking for biblical accuracies you'll be hard pressed to find it there as the movie goes beyond events protrayed in the Bible, those are but conjecture. Sometimes PotC is inconsistent with the way the Bible protrayed events. The most I can assign the movie as accuracy is the theological perspective of Mel. PotC in many ways is historically inaccurate and in others cannot be verified if it is or isn't accurate.

 

[Vincent]

Didn't Travolta already attempt this and it bombed?

You mean Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000.

Sounds like a B-movie to me

 

[Vincent]

Didn't Travolta already attempt this and it bombed?

You mean Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000.

Sounds like a B-movie to me