Two Weeks To Go

Dammy

Dammy

Member
Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
1,487
Reaction score
31
Two weeks to go until the GOP primary and I am having to talk myself into bothering to vote. It's pretty sad that the Presidential race is a minor consideration and if that was the only thing on the ballot, I probably wouldn't stop by (it's on my way to the main highway) to vote for the current GOP contenders. America is probably already pasted the point of no return and those who will attempt to lead America out of a massive inflationary style depression will most likely be who wins this election. Electing one of the Elite's picks is not going to help matters, they will just make American's slave collars of different weights to carry that will be pasted from generation to generation. Yet that is all we get to chose from, if we bother to chose at all.

The only thing more depressing is hearing from the shrills of the Elite's puppets who are more then eager to do the bidding of their masters while licking the Elite's boots hoping for a crumb of power.

2016 will be the critical election. It will set in concrete America's path for the next couple of centuries. I can only hope to see it and to see Americans renounce the elite's poison and begin America's reconstruction.
 
Obama gave us change, the wrong kind of change, as predicted. Under Obama we lost the Constitution and Bill Of Rights.
 
Let's dare to compare Mitt and Ron: for a start.

candidate-media-chart.jpg

Now look who's funding Romney and who funded Obama
mittsmoney.jpg


Right - but who's funding Romney versus who's funding Paul?
mitt_romney.jpg


Romney is being funded by the biggies in the financial industry so who will he be answerable to? And Paul is being funded by enlisted men and women so who will he be answerable to?

And for a little bit more comparison on their respective backgrounds...

Ron Paul is against SOPA, NDAA and the Patriot act. Romney says he would have signed the NDAA.

So what's the downside for you? Is it that Ron Paul wants to end the War on Drugs? Or that he wants to stop spending money on policing the world and bring the troops home? Or something else?
 
Ron "Soros" Paul is not a real option.
 
Dammy said:
Ron "Soros" Paul is not a real option.
Click to expand...
Glenn Beck is not a real analyst.

Glenn Beck has a contract with Clear Channel, Clear Channel is a controlled asset of Bain Capital and Bain Capital IS Mitt Romney.

And that's how "Democracy" works.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Glenn Beck is not a real analyst.

Glenn Beck has a contract with Clear Channel, Clear Channel is a controlled asset of Bain Capital and Bain Capital IS Mitt Romney.

And that's how "Democracy" works.
Click to expand...

jesus fluffy... by the time i get to the friggin board its just scraps of meat strewn about... you could save some for the rest of us...heh heh
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Glenn Beck is not a real analyst.

Glenn Beck has a contract with Clear Channel, Clear Channel is a controlled asset of Bain Capital and Bain Capital IS Mitt Romney.

And that's how "Democracy" works.
Click to expand...

Except that his GBTV is Mercury One (his own company) and isn't connected to Bain. By your reasoning, I guess Beck is controlled by Obama's OMB guy, Jeffery Zients since he is ex-Bain? But other then attempting to tar and feather the messenger, how about explaining to me, a GOPer, on why Ron "Soros" Paul is worthy of my vote when he in pretty deep with Barney Frank? 13 days for my vote...
 
Dammy said:
Except that his GBTV is Mercury One (his own company) and isn't connected to Bain.
Click to expand...
Just because he puts it out through a different channel does not make his contract irrelevant. When I on my own time I don't trash the guys who pay my cheque ... because they pay my cheque. Beck has a five year, $50 million contract - that's a lot of cheque and buys a lot of loyalty - and it's up in 2013. Do you suspect that might ever enter into his thoughts?

By your reasoning, I guess Beck is controlled by Obama's OMB guy, Jeffery Zients since he is ex-Bain?
Click to expand...

Really? My logic suggests that a guy who worked for Bain & Company (a business consulting firm founded in 1973) has influence with Bain Capital founded in 1984 ?

According to Bain & Company ...

Bain Capital was formed as a separate entity by former Bain consultants to further leverage Bain's results creation capability. Bain Capital is a venture capital company; it is not a sister company nor a division of Bain.
Click to expand...

I don't think that sounds very much like my logic at all. Sounds like something you would say.

But other then attempting to tar and feather the messenger, how about explaining to me, a GOPer, on why Ron "Soros" Paul is worthy of my vote when he in pretty deep with Barney Frank? 13 days for my vote...
Click to expand...

Beck tars and feathers Ron Paul and you mindlessly ditto it by calling him Ron "Soros" Paul. I have given multiple pointers to why Paul is worthy of your consideration and even your vote. His stand on issues goes back at least 30 years with a consistency virtually unheard of in modern politics. The Right-Wing elites hate him because he endangers their cronyism and if you looked a bit more at Paul than at what the establishment says about him you would know that.

Barney Frank and Ron Paul agree on some important issues but disagree on others. Both believe that the military is currently wasting enomous sums of money that could be better spent or saved. On the other hand, Ron Paul wants to end the Federal Reserve or at least force it to go under regular audits. Barney Frank does not want to audit the Fed but thinks that there should be more oversight. On the other hand, Mitt Romney wants to increase your taxes and cut his (being worth a quarter of a billion dollars he can live off his investments unlike 99.9% of the people).

If the Presidential race is between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama then there might as well not be a race at all as they are both for the same things.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Just because he puts it out through a different channel does not make his contract irrelevant. When I on my own time I don't trash the guys who pay my cheque ... because they pay my cheque. Beck has a five year, $50 million contract - that's a lot of cheque and buys a lot of loyalty - and it's up in 2013. Do you suspect that might ever enter into his thoughts?
Click to expand...

From what I'm hearing, GBTV is grossing multiple times more then that in it's first year alone. If anything, they would have dumped him long ago for his Soros episodes. BTW, Bain has ownership of the company that owns CCC. That's getting a bit diluted for control of a syndicated show's material. Now Ron Paul, OTOH, is a disaster from his editorial responsibilities in his own news letter to the zero bills passed that was authored by Ron Paul, to his misunderstanding of Islam sects and middle east religious and political balances.

I'm kinda thankful this is not going to be the critical election for America, that will be 2016 or maybe 2020 as America will decide how to begin reconstruction and the path that will lead. What is about to begin by the end of this year or early 2013 is unstoppable.
 
Dammy said:
From what I'm hearing, GBTV is grossing multiple times more then that in it's first year alone.
Click to expand...

You hear the darndest things. He's got a quarter million subscribers. The network is looking to pull in more than $20 million in the first year. Then he has to pay his expenses. Say that he personally gets to keep half of what comes in - that's still $10 million - which is what one year of his Clear Channel contract is worth. The contract is no chump change. It makes up a pretty decent chunk of his income (which is multiple millions a year so you know he really has the best interests of the little guy at heart when he is picking which politician to back).
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
You hear the darndest things. He's got a quarter million subscribers. The network is looking to pull in more than $20 million in the first year. Then he has to pay his expenses. Say that he personally gets to keep half of what comes in - that's still $10 million - which is what one year of his Clear Channel contract is worth. The contract is no chump change. It makes up a pretty decent chunk of his income (which is multiple millions a year so you know he really has the best interests of the little guy at heart when he is picking which politician to back).
Click to expand...

So what does that have to do with Ron Paul being in bed with Soros' people? If Beck is wrong, it should be easily refuted. If Beck is right, then it's much easier to smear Beck then prove a fact wrong. So far, I'm seeing the latter. Soros and his buddies win this election. You happy yet Mr.NWOaslongasprogressivesruleoverpeeons up there in Canada?
 
Dammy said:
If Beck is right, then it's much easier to smear Beck then prove a fact wrong.
Click to expand...
You make a valid point there but the same stands the other way around. It is easier to smear Paul than to prove the smear wrong. That's what smears are for. That's how politics works these days. What would Karl Rove do?

For example - Kerry Vs Bush. Kerry served and was decorated, Bush's dad got him a cushy flying job (which he didn't complete). Rove strategy - smear Kerry's war record. Now Ron Paul vs Mitt Romney. Ron Paul has the Constitutional cred and Mitt Romney is the rich elite kid. Strategy - smear Paul as an NWO lacky.

Nothing I say will likely get through - it'll probably just make you think that I'm part of the NWO conspiracy - you already seem to thin that I am a friend of Soros. I should see how he feels about that the next time we're golfing.

But you are letting a little money grubbing shill smear someone who has been around Washington for 40 years holding the same constitutional position and voting it.

And you don't want anyone to try to refute Glenn Beck because otherwise you might have been more forthcoming with "the evidence" but you don't really care about what's going on. You like your opinion and that's fine.

Personally I have lots of problems with Ron Paul's platform but if I was living in the US I would still vote Paul over Obama because there are issues that he will raise that need to be understood and talked about but the establishment doesn't want to discuss -- because it would hurt them. To gain their freedom Americans first have to understand how they are chained and to understand that they have to talk about it.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
You make a valid point there but the same stands the other way around. It is easier to smear Paul than to prove the smear wrong.
Click to expand...

Beck's video was damning enough for the need of Paul to refute it, and he didn't. That speaks volumes right there that he hasn't replied to it. I'm sure you don't like Beck at all, but give the man some credit, he does do research on his subjects.

What would Karl Rove do?
Click to expand...

I don't know, I really don't care what Karl Rove does or says. He is apart of the establishment and therefore, apart of the problem that has to be overcome.
 
Wow, now I've seen it all. Fluffy tearing apart a conspiracy theory. ;)

But I have to admit, Fluffy seems to be bang on in this case. Ron Paul seems to be what he advertises. Not sure I could say that about the rest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top