UFOs watching the nukes?

The Bigfoots realize the danager of nukes and therefore feel they must monitor. Dontcha know that?!
 
I read about this a while back here: http://www.cufos.org/missiles.pdf
It's been going on since the early 60's. It's quite scary because these things show up and the missiles start switching off - or sometimes on!

This sort of interference is widely reported with UFOs, yet we haven't the slightest idea what is happening.

It's no surprise that governments don't want to talk about UFOs (well, US and UK actually, many other governments are quite open about the subject). To admit to UFOs is to admit to things like this. I really don't think the people in charge of our military want to admit that they have no idea what is going on and they have no way to defend against it.

If these things turned nasty they wouldn't even have to attack, they just float around near some missiles and set them off, we'd be destroyed by our own weapons.


BTW http://www.cufos.org is the "Centre for UFO studies" that was set up by Dr. J. Allen Hynek to study UFOs in a scientific manner.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
Seriously? Well, let's hear all about it then. I guess we'll have to wait until Monday though.

In all seriousness, there have long been credible reports of UFOs around nuke sites. Whether these UFOs are piloted by grays, reptilians or just everyday commies is unknown.

-Edit-
I only mean "commie" in the most respectful way, of course, as it is a noble ideal.
 
minator said:
I read about this a while back here: http://www.cufos.org/missiles.pdf
It's been going on since the early 60's. It's quite scary because these things show up and the missiles start switching off - or sometimes on!

This sort of interference is widely reported with UFOs, yet we haven't the slightest idea what is happening.

Right, there is something there but the general public has no idea what it is.
 
minator said:
I read about this a while back here: http://www.cufos.org/missiles.pdf
It's been going on since the early 60's. It's quite scary because these things show up and the missiles start switching off - or sometimes on!
And you know this how? It's not like nuclear silos are open to the public. And how does one turn off and on a nuclear warhead? What does that mean exactly?
 
I think the probability is high we'll see something similar to the last BigFoot discovery. That was simply a costume in a box. Maybe some pictures of two pie tins together hanging by a string.
 
Glaucus said:
And you know this how?

:lol:

The bit where I said "I read about this a while back here:" should be a bit of a clue!
 
minator said:
The bit where I said "I read about this a while back here:" should be a bit of a clue!
Yes, I got that. And when you ask Christians how they know their religion is real they point to the bible. So let me make it more clear, how do you know that article isn't full of shit? It's not what I call inconclusive evidence.
 
Glaucus said:
minator said:
The bit where I said "I read about this a while back here:" should be a bit of a clue!
Yes, I got that. And when you ask Christians how they know their religion is real they point to the bible. So let me make it more clear, how do you know that article isn't full of shit? It's not what I call inconclusive evidence.

Look at the credibility of the witnesses and sheer number of them. It is easy for most to dismiss poorly educated rural "rednecks", but how do you dismiss such a vast number of highly credible witnesses? Besides this article and the show that is sure to follow, I recommend you watch this show mentioned in the article linked below.

http://www.examiner.com/ufo-in-national ... fo-secrets

They just showed it again last night on History Channel and will probably replay it soon.

The film's web site states that Fox "assembled the most credible UFO witnesses from around the world to testify at The National Press Club in Washington D.C.: Air Force Generals, astronauts, military and commercial pilots, government and FAA officials from seven countries tell stories that, as Governor Fife Symington from Arizona stated, 'will challenge your reality'.

"Their accounts reveal a behind-the-scenes U.S. operation whose policy is to confiscate and hoard substantiating evidence from close encounters to the extent that even Presidents have failed to get straight answers. I KNOW WHAT I SAW exposes reasons behind government secrecy from those involved at the highest level.

"Fox has won the support of several key media, government and military personnel, and has made numerous television and radio appearances including: Larry King Live, Anderson Cooper 360, ABC Nightline, Dateline NBC and George Noory's Coast to Coast Radio."
 
ask the police how useful 'witnesses' are. they get stuff wrong all the time
 
I'm not sure how I lean on this in general. My feeling is that intelligent extra terrestrial life visiting us here is highly improbable. Intelligent life being anywhere near us in the universe is improbable and life that is able to find us and traverse the distance is even more improbable and then having done that, showing themselves to the military but failing to make themselves otherwise known seems like strange behaviour indeed (unless the intention is to rule secretly through a viceroy - but what could they want from us that they couldn't more easily take or make themselves?)

As to the secrecy of the military, it doesn't surprise me. People may witness many phenomena and misinterpret them but if any phenomenon (natural, friendly or enemy) impacts a weapons system or operational viability then those things would certainly become classified. If it was an enemy probe or test you don't want to help the enemy know the results, or if it was ball lightning or other phenomenon you don't want to advertise that your system has weaknesses to electrical attack and if it was some system that you are developing yourself you don't want to reveal effects.

So far we have - people saw things - they don't know what they were - the military said keep quiet. The evidence at present doesn't yet overcome the improbability of the proposition that these are extra terrestrial craft.
 
FluffyMcDeath said:
My feeling is that intelligent extra terrestrial life visiting us here is highly improbable.
I agree. Though I'm with Steven Hawkins that I don't want them to visit us. If they are anything like us they are likely to enslave, spread diseases, if not exterminate major areas of our popular.
 
The best part was understanding these people are people. They give us the reasons the aliens are doing this. Meaning that part of their testamony is worthless, or at least until the aliens confirm it.

And the UN Denies appointment of alien ambassador.
 
Famed Physicist Michio Kaku Says Close to a “Smoking Gun” on UFOs
http://theintelhub.com/2010/08/25/famed ... n-on-ufos/

Dylan Ratigan of MSNBC says that UFO believers may now be vindicated.

On the Dylan Ratigan Show, he interviews famed theoretical physicist Michio Kaku on UFOs. Kaku says that Leslie Kean’s new book on UFOs “is as close as you are going to get to a smoking gun.”

In her book, “UFOs: Generals, Pilots and Government Officials Go On the Record” Kean documents how 5% of reported UFOs that have no earthly explanation. She tells how military and other government officials are coming forward to say that there is a “there” to the UFO phenomenon.

Kaku says that Aleins “could be thousands, millions of years more advanced.” If so, Kaku feels that if they are that far ahead in technology then the Aliens could in fact be visiting earth. He says that advanced physics would make interstellar travel likely.
 
Yes, I got that. And when you ask Christians how they know their religion is real they point to the bible.

Religion is a completely different issue, it is literally about belief, it has nothing to do with evidence - though obviously not everyone will agree with that.
Ironically science was pretty much started for religious reasons, by muslims.

So let me make it more clear, how do you know that article isn't full of shit?

I don't.

It's not what I call inconclusive evidence.

It's about UFOs. You are not going to get conclusive evidence.
The scientific method is based on the idea of repeatability, this is something that for whatever reason, is not repeatable.

I did once read quite a bit on the topic. It's clear at least 95% of all sighting can be explained. There's also an immense amount of bullshit out there which doesn't exactly help, but that's what you get when mainstream science chooses to ignore a topic rather than investigate it.

However there are scientists who study this, Hynek was the one who started it off, but there have been others since.

Unknown to most people there is quite a bit of evidence, and I don't just mean sightings, there's everything from radar tracks, ground traces, radiation burns and even dead bodies.

As for these particular cases, UFOs around military bases are not unknown, neither is the phenomena of electrical systems suddenly going dead, though no one can yet explain it.

All we know is there's someone flying things around which we have no understanding of, and they've been doing it for a very, very long time, by which I mean centuries, if not millennia.
 
minator said:
I did once read quite a bit on the topic. It's clear at least 95% of all sighting can be explained. There's also an immense amount of bullshit out there which doesn't exactly help, but that's what you get when mainstream science chooses to ignore a topic rather than investigate it.
...
All we know is there's someone flying things around which we have no understanding of, and they've been doing it for a very, very long time, by which I mean centuries, if not millennia.
And here's the problem. Just because something is unexplained doesn't mean one select a single unknown cause for the the explaination. Sometimes people and scientists simply don't have enough facts to lead them to the correct conclusion. Sometimes this evidence is impossible to collect. The answer is we don't know. The belief is it's little green men from another planet.
 
Back
Top