Watergate 2.0 on 50th anniversary of Watergate 1.0

Speaking of what gets mainstream coverage and what doesn't:


288681685_566591004990357_8481475182474088047_n.jpg
 
Yes yes, they "mostly peacefully" burned major blue cities to the ground and caused the most costly property damage in US history. You completely miss how this narrative fits entirely, much more so even, with what happened on 1/6/21, but is being framed entirely different. About 120,000 people went to the capital to protest on that day. That's only the number for the capital and not the number around the country. In total 865 people have been arrested for that day. Putting aside everything else and assuming all 865 are mustache swirling nefarious criminals, it still makes up 0.7% (less than 1%) of those at the capital that day, let alone around the country.

George Floyd riots were not the only organized terrorism during Trump's presidency. It was almost nonstop for 4+ years. Those events barely got mainstream news mentions and when they were they were framed like you just posted. The Jan6 event saw not a single person killed by a protestor. There were no millions in damages, let alone hundreds of billions in damages. The sham hearings are put in a prime time slot and produced by a Hollywood producer. They didn't even follow congressional rules when selecting speakers. The whole thing is a sham "Reality Show" brought to you by the same people who had dems believing in things like the "Trump pee pee tape", Russian collusion and so on. As the viewership numbers show, it's not working any longer. As it's not working they are getting increasing desperate with the midterms approaching.
so, you didn't read or understand the links
thanks for playing
 
Trump was not in the protestors, did not direct the protestors and did not open the doors and escort the protestors in. He even told them to go home in peace before the shenanigans started.
According to Cassidy Hutchison, who I suppose could be a lying libtard, he wanted to allow armed protestors:
 
Back
Top