2020 Presidential Debates

[redrumloa]

Even Fox barely covered it.

24.5 minutes long and doesn't even cover it all.

 

[Robert]

Ya'll are most dems, you and even some on the right hand side.

So remind me when I said Biden being too old was a hoax?

Even now you what I am replying to you are trying to claim that Biden's mental ability is equivalent to Trump.

I said they were both too old. They both are too old. Mental ability doesn't need to even be similar for them to both be too old.

Clearly you are still listening to and believing the same talking points the "media" are pushing.

Their current propaganda is that Trump is as bad or worse than Biden.

Trump is worse than Biden but that has little to do with either of their ages.

 

[redrumloa]

Trump is worse than Biden but that has little to do with either of their ages.

Only president in my lifetime to have no new military conflicts, brought North Korea to heel, sub $2.00/gal gasoline, record low inflation @ ~1.6%, record low unemployment, sub 3% interest rates on mortgages, made NATO members pay their share, affordable groceries and rent, record low illegal border crossings, building the wall, kept Russia in check, etc etc etc.

But yeah, none of that makes up for mean tweets and jokes about Rosie O'Donnell, right?

 

[Robert]

But yeah, none of that makes up for mean tweets and jokes about Rosie O'Donnell, right?

Well, there's that.
Then there's the sexual assaults.
Then there's the numerous felony convictions.
Then there's the mocking disabled people, POWs, foreigners, etc.
Then there's the "grab 'em by the pussy" personality.
etc, etc.
The man is an unapologetic bullying buffoon and a horrible excuse for a human being. The saddest thing is, that's the real reason a lot of people like him.

 

[redrumloa]

Then there's the sexual assaults.

Unproven, likely fake claims. There are similar claims against Biden, including from his own daughter.

Then there's the numerous felony convictions.

Obvious lawfare that will be overturned on appeal. There was no crime. i bet you can't even tell me what the actual crime was without Googling and even then probably struggle to say what the actual crime was in a way you could defend.

Then there's the mocking disabled people, POWs, foreigners, etc.

Hoaxes you fell for. You can show a clip of that one journalist he mocked, but it wasn't a disability he mocked. He did an the old "duh, I'm a moron" gesture that's been around for decades.



If that journalist is weak minded and afraid of being the target of criticism, maybe he's in the wrong line of work.

Then there's the "grab 'em by the pussy" personality.

Locker room talk about consenting adult women. Not my personality, but what consenting adults want to do in their free time is up to them.

Biden sniffing and molesting women and children repeatedly on camera doesn't move the needle for you. Neither does the fact both him and his son are known p3d0s bother you.

 

[Robert]

There are similar claims against Biden,

Until Biden has been found liable for sexual assault, there is no comparison. And even if that day comes, so what? Then you'll just have two horrible rapists instead of one and the only difference would be you'd still make excuses for one of them.

 

[redrumloa]

We'll see. It's amusing the way you claim to be against crimes of various sorts, accusing people on the flimsiest of evidence, until your hero is actually found guilty of such crimes. Then you either turn into an apologist for illegal behaviour or claim it's all a stitch up, based on nothing more than your adoration of the culprit.

No, I always have receipts. If you can't see the Dem playbook of attacks, I got nothing for you. I bet you still think Brett Kavanaugh is part of a rape gang.

He had a disability and Trump mocked him by doing a cr

He did exactly what I said he did.

Known pedos? What, like Trump's pal Epstein?

Nice try. Trump never flew on Lolita Express, unlike Bill Clinton did dozens of times and never visited pedophile Island, like Slick Willy at least 14 times. Trump was never "friends" with Epstein and only ever bumped into him at NY functions. Bill Clinton OTOH is pictured with Epstein victims. you do know your gif is from LONG before his first legal problems right? People like Bill Gates hobnobbed with him long after his conviction, which is why his wife left him (her words).

Trump actually threw Epstein out of Mara Lago and banned him for life for inappropriate behavior.

Would you be surprised if it came out that Trump had sex with underage girls? It wouldn't surprise me any more than it would surprise me to see you jump to his defence in such circumstances.

I've always said release the Epstein client list and let the chips fall where they may. *IF* Trump was actually on there, I'd have the same disdain for actual p3d0s like Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden etc.

 

[Robert]

He did exactly what I said he did.

You asserting that again doesn't make it any more believable than the first time but even if he was doing what you said, what would that say about his judgement? Horrible behaviour in one scenario and even worse in the other.

Trump was never "friends" with Epstein

It's clear from that clip they were getting along just dandy-oh. His comments on Maxwell's arrest were also not those of someone who barely knew her.

Bill Clinton OTOH is pictured with Epstein victims.

Pointing out someone else is also a creepy chum to a mass-paedophile is not the defence of Trump that you think it is. It still leaves him as a creepy chum to a mass-paedophile.

I've always said release the Epstein client list and let the chips fall where they may.

Did you watch his interview with Fridman? He asks Trump about releasing the list and Trump goes a bit coy and changes the subject without committing to releasing it.

*IF* Trump was actually on there.

I don't think he is but I think he knows and likes others who are on there, hence his reluctance to talk about it.

You get awfully touchy at the suggestion he's your hero but look at your continued defence of the man. He is an utter cretin with all sorts horrible stains to his record but you have him on a pedestal, claiming all of those stains are mere smears or lies. You explain away or excuse them all. Not just some of them, all of them. If that's not classic, blinkered hero-worship I don't know what is.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Did you watch his interview with Fridman? He asks Trump about releasing the list and Trump goes a bit coy and changes the subject without committing to releasing it.

He may have been coy for many reasons. He hasn't released all the the JFK material he said he would either. He may have dirty hands or he may just be getting leaned on by people who do. Epstein's project could have just been a personal endeavour but it does have the look of a state sponsored operation. If the state was a "friendly" one it would be very difficult to survive releasing too much.
And we still don't know what secrets Trump forgot to give back at the end of his term. Wonder if there was anything Epsteinious in that pile. We can't know - unless a president declassified it.

 

[redrumloa]

but it does have the look of a state sponsored operation. If the state was a "friendly" one it would be very difficult to survive releasing too much

I think it's a given that it was at least in part a state sponsored honeypot. Anyone who dismisses the concept outright at worst is an idiot and at best doesn't know history. It's been done before in the US, such as Operation Midnight Climax.

The agency appeared to be experiencing its own form of madness. The San Francisco branch of the program (the other hub was in New York City) was dubbed Operation Midnight Climax and it involved agents using hookers to lure johns into a secret pad decorated with photos of women in bondage and other suggestive images by the French artist Toulouse-Lautrec. The johns were given acid-laced cocktails and, from behind two-way mirrors, a Bureau of Narcotics agent, who doubled as a CIA operative, along with his minions would quaff martinis and watch the drugged sex.

That link isn't Infowars, it's Time Magazine. With Epstein it was probably more of a way to compromise high level people.

 

[Robert]

He may have been coy for many reasons.

Indeed. As I said, my guess is he knows people on the list.

He may have dirty hands or he may just be getting leaned on by people who do. Epstein's project could have just been a personal endeavour but it does have the look of a state sponsored operation. If the state was a "friendly" one it would be very difficult to survive releasing too much.

Either way, it doesn't look like he'll be releasing it if/when he gets back in.

 

[redrumloa]

The "wearing a wire" anons are back!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1833699041638592771

I dismissed this when you posted it because unlike the claim against Biden that looked more likely, I didn't think the resemblance of Kamala's earings matched. Now the company who makes the wireless audio hearings have themselves responded.

Wireless Audio Earrings Company Responds to Rumors Kamala Harris Wore Earpiece During Presidential Debate​

“The resemblance is striking,” the company told Just The News.

Read more on this story from Just The News reported:

Following the presidential debate on Tuesday, social media users theorized that Vice President Kamala Harris wore audio earrings on stage. The Germany-based company that sells the earrings said on Wednesday that the resemblance between Harris’ earrings and their audio earrings “is striking.”

 

[Robert]

I didn't think the resemblance of Kamala's earings matched. Now the company who makes the wireless audio hearings have themselves responded.

They sound deadly serious too:

"To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign. The choice of colour is a bit challenging though as orange does not go well with a lot of colours."

I think they might just be yanking your chain, old bean.