Anti-evolution movie making liberal reviewers furious!

[Speelgoedmannetje]

I like anything that pisses the establishment off.

Hm, personally I like such too... but I think I'd like this more because of the amazement. Because of the amazement of inbred retards being taken seriously.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

I like anything that pisses the establishment off.

Hm, personally I like such too... but I think I'd like this more because of the amazement. Because of the amazement of inbred retards being taken seriously.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

I like anything that pisses the establishment off.

Hm, personally I like such too... but I think I'd like this more because of the amazement. Because of the amazement of inbred retards being taken seriously.

 

[Speelgoedmannetje]

I like anything that pisses the establishment off.

Hm, personally I like such too... but I think I'd like this more because of the amazement. Because of the amazement of inbred retards being taken seriously.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Can't you just see the froth dripping down the sides of the reviewer's mounth?

Well, I've read the review now and I don't see any frothing. It looks pretty much just about right on the money.

As for Ben, he's a lawyer, a writer, economist, and presidential adviser. He's written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, New York Magazine, Penthouse, Los Angeles Magazine and Barron's Magazine. He's been a speech writer for Nixon and Ford. He's been a prof at American University and University of California, Santa Cruz, and Pepperdine. He's taught libel law and US securities law. Sounds like he's just about as establishment as it gets.

On the other hand, he has been an advocate for raising taxes on the rich. So maybe he's a bit of a liberal, eh?

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Can't you just see the froth dripping down the sides of the reviewer's mounth?

Well, I've read the review now and I don't see any frothing. It looks pretty much just about right on the money.

As for Ben, he's a lawyer, a writer, economist, and presidential adviser. He's written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, New York Magazine, Penthouse, Los Angeles Magazine and Barron's Magazine. He's been a speech writer for Nixon and Ford. He's been a prof at American University and University of California, Santa Cruz, and Pepperdine. He's taught libel law and US securities law. Sounds like he's just about as establishment as it gets.

On the other hand, he has been an advocate for raising taxes on the rich. So maybe he's a bit of a liberal, eh?

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Can't you just see the froth dripping down the sides of the reviewer's mounth?

Well, I've read the review now and I don't see any frothing. It looks pretty much just about right on the money.

As for Ben, he's a lawyer, a writer, economist, and presidential adviser. He's written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, New York Magazine, Penthouse, Los Angeles Magazine and Barron's Magazine. He's been a speech writer for Nixon and Ford. He's been a prof at American University and University of California, Santa Cruz, and Pepperdine. He's taught libel law and US securities law. Sounds like he's just about as establishment as it gets.

On the other hand, he has been an advocate for raising taxes on the rich. So maybe he's a bit of a liberal, eh?

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Can't you just see the froth dripping down the sides of the reviewer's mounth?

Well, I've read the review now and I don't see any frothing. It looks pretty much just about right on the money.

As for Ben, he's a lawyer, a writer, economist, and presidential adviser. He's written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, New York Magazine, Penthouse, Los Angeles Magazine and Barron's Magazine. He's been a speech writer for Nixon and Ford. He's been a prof at American University and University of California, Santa Cruz, and Pepperdine. He's taught libel law and US securities law. Sounds like he's just about as establishment as it gets.

On the other hand, he has been an advocate for raising taxes on the rich. So maybe he's a bit of a liberal, eh?

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Can't you just see the froth dripping down the sides of the reviewer's mounth?

Well, I've read the review now and I don't see any frothing. It looks pretty much just about right on the money.

As for Ben, he's a lawyer, a writer, economist, and presidential adviser. He's written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, New York Magazine, Penthouse, Los Angeles Magazine and Barron's Magazine. He's been a speech writer for Nixon and Ford. He's been a prof at American University and University of California, Santa Cruz, and Pepperdine. He's taught libel law and US securities law. Sounds like he's just about as establishment as it gets.

On the other hand, he has been an advocate for raising taxes on the rich. So maybe he's a bit of a liberal, eh?

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

Can't you just see the froth dripping down the sides of the reviewer's mounth?

Well, I've read the review now and I don't see any frothing. It looks pretty much just about right on the money.

As for Ben, he's a lawyer, a writer, economist, and presidential adviser. He's written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, New York Magazine, Penthouse, Los Angeles Magazine and Barron's Magazine. He's been a speech writer for Nixon and Ford. He's been a prof at American University and University of California, Santa Cruz, and Pepperdine. He's taught libel law and US securities law. Sounds like he's just about as establishment as it gets.

On the other hand, he has been an advocate for raising taxes on the rich. So maybe he's a bit of a liberal, eh?

 

[redrumloa]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece. Besides, I get the impression you are missing the whole point behind the film. I'll go see it when it comes out and let you know what I feel.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

 

[redrumloa]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece. Besides, I get the impression you are missing the whole point behind the film. I'll go see it when it comes out and let you know what I feel.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

 

[redrumloa]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece. Besides, I get the impression you are missing the whole point behind the film. I'll go see it when it comes out and let you know what I feel.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

 

[redrumloa]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece. Besides, I get the impression you are missing the whole point behind the film. I'll go see it when it comes out and let you know what I feel.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

 

[redrumloa]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece. Besides, I get the impression you are missing the whole point behind the film. I'll go see it when it comes out and let you know what I feel.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

 

[redrumloa]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece. Besides, I get the impression you are missing the whole point behind the film. I'll go see it when it comes out and let you know what I feel.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece.

I agree. I only said that what I have seen of it so far has not impressed me. It just takes some old arguments and trots out the old "scientist conspiracy" canard. I will almost certainly download it and watch it, I'm just not going to pay for the experience.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

Well, it certainly is foolish. However, IDers like to pick and choose what could have evolved and invariably anything that they like to point at as an example of something that couldn't evolve gets shown to be something that can be shown to be exactly the sort of thing that could have evolved. Basically, ID is creationism: creationism is religion.

What Ben does, besides the dishonesty of interviewing under deliberately false pretenses (because he knows well that the scientists he "interviewed" would not have agreed to be interviewed in such a movie), he is dishonest (or very confused) about what evolution is.

He takes biological evolution and tries to say that it doesn't explain the creation of the universe, neglecting to mention that it isn't supposed to. It's like saying since the theory of electromagnetism doesn't explain gravity we have to invoke the theory of "intelligent falling", or that some great supernatural being keeps us down.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece.

I agree. I only said that what I have seen of it so far has not impressed me. It just takes some old arguments and trots out the old "scientist conspiracy" canard. I will almost certainly download it and watch it, I'm just not going to pay for the experience.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

Well, it certainly is foolish. However, IDers like to pick and choose what could have evolved and invariably anything that they like to point at as an example of something that couldn't evolve gets shown to be something that can be shown to be exactly the sort of thing that could have evolved. Basically, ID is creationism: creationism is religion.

What Ben does, besides the dishonesty of interviewing under deliberately false pretenses (because he knows well that the scientists he "interviewed" would not have agreed to be interviewed in such a movie), he is dishonest (or very confused) about what evolution is.

He takes biological evolution and tries to say that it doesn't explain the creation of the universe, neglecting to mention that it isn't supposed to. It's like saying since the theory of electromagnetism doesn't explain gravity we have to invoke the theory of "intelligent falling", or that some great supernatural being keeps us down.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece.

I agree. I only said that what I have seen of it so far has not impressed me. It just takes some old arguments and trots out the old "scientist conspiracy" canard. I will almost certainly download it and watch it, I'm just not going to pay for the experience.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

Well, it certainly is foolish. However, IDers like to pick and choose what could have evolved and invariably anything that they like to point at as an example of something that couldn't evolve gets shown to be something that can be shown to be exactly the sort of thing that could have evolved. Basically, ID is creationism: creationism is religion.

What Ben does, besides the dishonesty of interviewing under deliberately false pretenses (because he knows well that the scientists he "interviewed" would not have agreed to be interviewed in such a movie), he is dishonest (or very confused) about what evolution is.

He takes biological evolution and tries to say that it doesn't explain the creation of the universe, neglecting to mention that it isn't supposed to. It's like saying since the theory of electromagnetism doesn't explain gravity we have to invoke the theory of "intelligent falling", or that some great supernatural being keeps us down.

 

[FluffyMcDeath]

You all can make your mind about the movie without seeing it? I seem to remember getting ripped to shreds for refusing to pay money for Moore's nonsense propoganda piece.

I agree. I only said that what I have seen of it so far has not impressed me. It just takes some old arguments and trots out the old "scientist conspiracy" canard. I will almost certainly download it and watch it, I'm just not going to pay for the experience.

For the record I think it would be foolish to claim evolution does not exist in any form, obviously it does. I doubt most ID supporters would deny evolution exists.

Well, it certainly is foolish. However, IDers like to pick and choose what could have evolved and invariably anything that they like to point at as an example of something that couldn't evolve gets shown to be something that can be shown to be exactly the sort of thing that could have evolved. Basically, ID is creationism: creationism is religion.

What Ben does, besides the dishonesty of interviewing under deliberately false pretenses (because he knows well that the scientists he "interviewed" would not have agreed to be interviewed in such a movie), he is dishonest (or very confused) about what evolution is.

He takes biological evolution and tries to say that it doesn't explain the creation of the universe, neglecting to mention that it isn't supposed to. It's like saying since the theory of electromagnetism doesn't explain gravity we have to invoke the theory of "intelligent falling", or that some great supernatural being keeps us down.