Climate Change - Is the Tide Turning?

redrumloa said:
cecilia said:
Are we just jealous, red?

Puhlease. I sleep good at night, real good.
maybe you need therapy to figure out why you constantly harp on someone who is basically irrelevant
 
cecilia said:
maybe you need therapy to figure out why you constantly harp on someone who is basically irrelevant

Irrelevant? So I wish!!!

Al Gore Wields More Influence Out of Government
The former vice president has more freedom to advance his agenda on climate change and other issues

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/ene ... nment.html

The greatest irony of Gore's career is that he's arguably more influential outside of government than when he was nearly atop it. His lecture series on global warming became a blockbuster Hollywood film, then won him a Nobel Prize.

Gore pushes his solutions at meetings with world leaders and academics and through a public information campaign. And his effort is becoming self-perpetuating: In the past several months, he's begun actively encouraging scientists to become more political in expressing their views.
 
Heard an interesting comparision today. Republicans have argued for the 1% Doctrine on Terrorism If there's a 1% chance that the US would be subject to a terrorist attack we must treat it as a certainity. The result is we must spare no expense, torture whomever whenever we want, and invade any nation.

While I agree this is a poor idea, Republicans fail to apply the same reasoning to climate change. There is a 1% chance that the population is changing the not just the US but the world's climate should we not treat it as a certainity?
 
faethor said:
Heard an interesting comparision today. Republicans have argued for the 1% Doctrine on Terrorism If there's a 1% chance that the US would be subject to a terrorist attack we must treat it as a certainity. The result is we must spare no expense, torture whomever whenever we want, and invade any nation.

While I agree this is a poor idea, Republicans fail to apply the same reasoning to climate change. There is a 1% chance that the population is changing the not just the US but the world's climate should we not treat it as a certainity?
as they can't seem to figure out how to make money from climate change they deem it unimportant
 
redrumloa said:
cecilia said:
maybe you need therapy to figure out why you constantly harp on someone who is basically irrelevant

Irrelevant? So I wish!!!

Al Gore Wields More Influence Out of Government
The former vice president has more freedom to advance his agenda on climate change and other issues

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/ene ... nment.html

The greatest irony of Gore's career is that he's arguably more influential outside of government than when he was nearly atop it. His lecture series on global warming became a blockbuster Hollywood film, then won him a Nobel Prize.

[quote:rxy7y2mr]Gore pushes his solutions at meetings with world leaders and academics and through a public information campaign. And his effort is becoming self-perpetuating: In the past several months, he's begun actively encouraging scientists to become more political in expressing their views.
[/quote:rxy7y2mr]you crack me up

yeah, how horrible, gore makes a movie and goes around the world talking. imagine that! whatever he says about Anything is just a jumping off point. people should then go off and investigate on their own and more importantly go see what people doing the research are saying.

frankly, his efforts to get people to look into this IS important, but they still have to do the bulk of the work themselves.
 
@cecilia

I understand that people have issue that net the science discussed in the Gore film is only in the high 90% accuracy. Sure there may be some issues and certainly as we learn more in the coming decade the accuracy may decrease and might even deserve a 2nd revision.

There are bigger problems in the US schools science programs. One example is evolution. Many schools are still scared and skirt the direct discussion of the science. Many schools do not have a robotics program, this should be a requirement in science and math. Out of the 30 industrailized nations the US falls about in the mid-point.

We see the fall out of our educational system within our society today. People declare the need for more VISA workers so we can import the medical and scientific talent we are lacking. That is clearly the lazy and wrong answer. We have 300Million people in this country. Medical and scientific talent is some of the most highly paid. What are we doing wrong that we cannot educate our own nation? We should be building the critical thinking and skills for high tech position. Many call for the 3RS, sorry but this is well beyond Reading, wRiting and aRithmatic. The failure is within our own society.

I see the problem worsening as Federal, State, and Local governments are under some of the largest economic pressures ever. What the governments seem to be doing is stealing or delaying payments to educational institutions. (Thank you MN Republican Gov. Pawlenty.) We need to recommit to education for our nation's future.

Gore is the failure? I can only hope that was meant as a joke.
 
if I had a dime for every time i pointed out the educational system in the US I could retire in great wealth.

I see stupidity all the time. irrationality is rampant.

strangely enough I'm amazed at how many groups there are on FaceBook that try to address irrational thinking. honestly, it's great to see the concern and passion out there!

what those of us who are rational have to figure out is how do we get all this important work done despite the loons. we will never convince them. we have to work around them.

creationalists are certifiable. Frankly I think they are so far gone in their delusions it's a waste of time reasoning with them.

trying to appeal to people by pointing out that they are endangering the future of their children by not teaching them science - like evolution - falls on deaf ears. They don't care. they would rather embrace their ignorance than be good parents.
 
Minnesota has one of the better educational systems. Though it's lost ground under Republican Governer Pawlenty. And he wants to run for President? One can only imagine what would happen if he did this nation wide. His latest idea -- take $1Billion back from K-12 but mostly the State's University system. :whack:

And I agree there are those with irrational delusions which are simply unwilling to entertain the idea that there may be a more rational way to look at the world. Many are harmless. But, we do have our own Christian version of the Taliban in the US. These are the one's that try to push the ignorance is bliss agenda. If we don't talk about evilution or safe sex our kids will never figure it out. The anti-intelligence approach is strong with some. I don't recall this 'force' being as vocal in the past. In the last decade it seems that being less education is a virtue to some. Come on people we were founded out of the Age of Reason and Enlightenment where education is a good.
 
faethor said:
Come on people we were founded out of the Age of Reason and Enlightenment where education is a good.
Isn't it Ironic how most Americans fear intellectuals? Republicans have even convinced their supporters that they're better off dumb. Pretty sad. But then, we're talking about the country that also invented country music. :roll:
 
cecilia said:
"to present the science curriculum where it addresses scientific controversies" -- Seriously people this is the dawn of the 21st Century not the 19th. I suppose there's some gain in learning why the Lamarckian hypothesis was discarded. Though this clearly isn't the point of this legislation.

Personally the story of the scientific controversy of Germ Theory is a more interesting read.

Now I'm all for teaching 'Intelligent Design'. Educating kids about different religions is acceptable. Indoctrination is illegal. There should be a class teaching the differences between the Intelligent Creation as carried out by the Apaches, Aboriginaies, Brahma, and the Demiurge. And of course the latest Intelligent Design Theory -- The Flying Spaghetti Monster.
 
faethor said:
cecilia said:
"to present the science curriculum where it addresses scientific controversies" -- Seriously people this is the dawn of the 21st Century not the 19th. I suppose there's some gain in learning why the Lamarckian hypothesis was discarded. Though this clearly isn't the point of this legislation.

Personally the story of the scientific controversy of Germ Theory is a more interesting read.

Now I'm all for teaching 'Intelligent Design'. Educating kids about different religions is acceptable. Indoctrination is illegal. There should be a class teaching the differences between the Intelligent Creation as carried out by the Apaches, Aboriginaies, Brahma, and the Demiurge. And of course the latest Intelligent Design Theory -- The Flying Spaghetti Monster.
I've said many many times that religion should be taught in religion class and science taught in science class. what IS the big deal?

those of us with at least 2 brain cells firing know that the wacko ID nuts want that science mojo that religion just doesn't have.

too bad so sad
 
Michael Mann - Unprecedented Attacks on Climate Research

For the scientists who study global warming, now is the winter of their despair.

In the news, it has been climate scandal after alleged climate scandal. First came “ClimateGate,” then “GlacierGate,” “Amazon Gate,” and so on. In public opinion polls, meanwhile, Americans’ acceptance of the science of global warming appears to be declining. Even a freak snowstorm now seems to sow added doubt about this rigorous body of research.

In response to growing public skepticism—and a wave of dramatic attacks on individual researchers—the scientific community is now bucking up to more strongly defend its knowledge. Leading the charge is one of the most frequently attacked researchers of them all—Pennsylvania State University climatologist Michael Mann.

link has mp3 file
 
Jan 2010 was colder many places in the USA. Not every place for the West Coast was fairly warm. The USA is about 1.5% of all the land in the world. (We just like to think we're a bigger part.) Worldwide Jan 2010 was the 2nd coldest measured in the last 130 years.
 
Phil Jones, of climategate email fame was hauled in front of MPs to account for himself. The Register has a good writeup.

"during peer review nobody had ever asked to see his raw data or methods."

So much for the rock solid peer review that everyone cites as proof that this stuff isn't junk science.
 
smithy said:
Phil Jones, of climategate email fame was hauled in front of MPs to account for himself. The Register has a good writeup.

"during peer review nobody had ever asked to see his raw data or methods."

So much for the rock solid peer review that everyone cites as proof that this stuff isn't junk science.

OUCH! That should leave a mark!
 
“Why can’t independent people check your scientific papers?” asked Stringer.

“It isn’t traditionally done,” replied Jones. Stringer continued, quoting Jones' email to Warwick Hughes, famous before Climategate broke, refusing to give data. Jones had said, "Why should I make the data available when your aim is to find something wrong with it?"

Scam, scam, scam :roll:
 
redrumloa said:
“Why can’t independent people check your scientific papers?” asked Stringer.

“It isn’t traditionally done,” replied Jones. Stringer continued, quoting Jones' email to Warwick Hughes, famous before Climategate broke, refusing to give data. Jones had said, "Why should I make the data available when your aim is to find something wrong with it?"

Scam, scam, scam :roll:

The Commons Science and Technology Committee criticised UEA authorities for failing to respond to requests for data from climate change sceptics.
But it found no evidence Professor Phil Jones, whose e-mails were hacked and published online, had manipulated data.
It said his reputation, and that of his climate research unit, remained intact.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm
 
Back
Top