- Joined
- Apr 2, 2005
- Messages
- 14,966
- Reaction score
- 2,154
metalman said:
Actually there was a hard film of ice on the windshield. The picture showed after it had been scrapped off. Unless I misunderstand the definition of frost, this was ice.
metalman said:
metalman said:
Glaucus said:So I know you guys are getting a kick out of all this weird weather in Florida, but you can't use it to form an argument about global weather trends as Florida isn't a good indicator.
redrumloa said:metalman said:
Actually there was a hard film of ice on the windshield. The picture showed after it had been scrapped off. Unless I misunderstand the definition of frost, this was ice.
I stopped reading after "Yes" as I'm so thrilled that we can finally agree on Global Warming. I knew you'd come around.redrumloa said:Glaucus said:So I know you guys are getting a kick out of all this weird weather in Florida, but you can't use it to form an argument about global weather trends as Florida isn't a good indicator.
Yes
The answer to your Yes and No is well, Yes and No. Scientists continue to research the impact of Global Warming to Hurricanes. Now just because 1 happens to miss Florida doesn't mean there's no Hurricane. Atlantic Hurricanes have been increasing in frequency. Also it appears that hurricane paths are changing.redrumloa said:Yes and no, Mike. The "scientist" and politicians do the exact same thing when it fits their agenda, when it doesn't they use your argument. Don't you remember what was said after the 2004-2005 hurricane seasons? I do, I lived through the 8 hurricanes that made landfall in Florida those 2 years. This was used as the slam dunk answer to prove global warming. Al Gore even put a picture of a hurricane for his movie. In 2007-(early)2008 we had a slightly atypical dry spell and it was used as proof of global warming.Glaucus said:So I know you guys are getting a kick out of all this weird weather in Florida, but you can't use it to form an argument about global weather trends as Florida isn't a good indicator.
The biggest problem with the 'Greenhouse Theory' is it's a allegory used for a describing things to a layman. No climatologist has scientifically shown that greenhouses and the atmosphere work by the exact same processes. It's a term used for simplification of explaination. What the problem here is anti-gw assume they are one in the same, disprove that the atmosphere works as a greenhouse then do the dance of the strawmen.metalman said:This demonstrates the big problem with the global warming greenhouse theory
faethor said:The biggest problem with the 'Greenhouse Theory' is it's a allegory used for a describing things to a layman.
Though it appears not all 'scientists' know this. Gerlich and Tscheuschner were able to get their anti-gw published. G&T's paper is an epic fail where the first 40+ pages is building the strawman of 'Greenhouse' is really how the atmosphere works then knocking it down. A great :roflmao: as they now probably in the running for the longest logical fallacy masquarade as a scientific paper. Also I consider the pie on the face of the Physics Journal.metalman said:layman understand Greenhouse theory is an allegory otherwise there would "have to be an actual greenhouse glass"
It appears not all predictions match your statement here's one showing a prediction not of the hottest year ever but one of the top 5. Turns out 2009 is working out to the be the 5th hottest year ever measured.The global warming prediction was 2009 would be the hottest year ever.
faethor said:It appears not all predictions match your statement here's one showing a prediction not of the hottest year ever but one of the top 5. Turns out 2009 is working out to the be the 5th hottest year ever measured.The global warming prediction was 2009 would be the hottest year ever.
:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:Tue Dec 30, 2008 6:37pm GMT
Not sure why that's funny? The prediction was prior to 2009. Sure there may be other predictions. It was simply one illustrating that not all predictions were 2009 as the hottest ever.metalman said:Prediction made:
went out on a limb and didn't wait for that last days data??Tue Dec 30, 2008 6:37pm GMT
Even with a cooler US I believe we were slightly above average. There is another hemisphere. Africa and Australia received some of their hottest months ever measured. This more than off-set the cooler US. The Arctic also remains a warm area.Must have been unusually warm in Siberia this year, to offset the North American cooling they really had to apply "data corrections" to get that result!
faethor said:Here's the NOAA Map for Jan-Nov of 2009.
You can see the slightly cooler US and Siberia (since you asked). Check out Africa, Europe, Asia, South America, Australia - all significantly warmer than the US.
Do you know this arguement has been disproven? Besides NOAA there are other data set which coorespond to the same change. This includes satelittes which show nearly the same change as ground based measured. Statiticans have compared the changes over time in raw numbers set and the quality adjusted set(you feel wrongly) and both resultants produce changes with no statisically significant difference.metalman said:This graph shows the difference between the raw temperature set and the published (corrected) temperature set.
Heresay at it's finest. Give us something that's verifiable. Which scientist said this when and about what conditions?Snowless winters coming
..Another wrong prediction.
Sherry L. Schlueter, Executive Director of the Wildlife Care Center in Ft. Lauderdale, explains how to handle a frozen iguana. With temperatures dipping near freezing, these non-native reptiles can't handle the cold and their scaly bodies shut down until they are able to warm up again.
Glaucus said:I take it you're not keeping any blankets warm in the drier in case you run across a chilled iguana in need of some assistance?
redrumloa said:Glaucus said:I take it you're not keeping any blankets warm in the drier in case you run across a chilled iguana in need of some assistance?
Just updated my post and no! :x I have a rusty machette in case one falls out of a tree in my back yard.
While some people find wild green iguanas to be a beautiful addition to the Florida ecosystem, the sad fact is that they do not belong there. As a consequence, at this time, they do not have a balanced place in the ecosystem with predators and competitors to keep their populations in check. At this time, very little has been done to study the ecological impact that green iguanas may have in Florida. However, given the negative impacts of many exotic species around the globe, such as the zebra mussel, English sparrow, walking catfish, and plants such as kudzu and purple loose-strife, it is best to assume that green iguanas will have some negative impact on the Florida ecosystem.
Robert said:Not sure I'd go down the rusty macheté route but I see where you're coming from.
redrumloa said:Glaucus said:I take it you're not keeping any blankets warm in the drier in case you run across a chilled iguana in need of some assistance?
Just updated my post and no! :x I have a rusty machette in case one falls out of a tree in my back yard.
metalman said:Iguana meat is sold, goes for around $14/lb in gourmet stores :wink: