Has Q chucked it?

I had no idea the CEO of Gab was such a crackpot.
Got another wacky email from Mr. Torba this morning, reminding me, "We are human beings made in the image of God" and "Jesus is King" and "“Religious + Practical Side Supporting Documents” contains all of the details giving both the religious reasons for why Christians cannot receive the Vaccine".
:confused:
 
Got another wacky email from Mr. Torba this morning, reminding me, "We are human beings made in the image of God" and "Jesus is King" and "“Religious + Practical Side Supporting Documents” contains all of the details giving both the religious reasons for why Christians cannot receive the Vaccine".
:confused:
There are 8 billion souls on earth today with more coming all the time. Heaven is filling up so if you want your spot you'd better get ahead of the rush. Seriously. Heaven: people are dying to get in!
 
Things not going so well for the Q Shaman now, according to Jim Watkins:
E7wawlsUYAIxlUL
 
Jake should be getting therapy.
And reading lots of books of a great Variety would be good for him and everyone.
But him not being inundated by the BS on fox NOT-news is a good thing.

how many serial killers does his mom know? :eek:
 
Jake should be getting therapy.
And reading lots of books of a great Variety would be good for him and everyone.
But him not being inundated by the BS on fox NOT-news is a good thing.

how many serial killers does his mom know? :eek:
I think most serial killers are not kept in solitary confinement. This is especially concerning if he is in solitary already and has not even been convicted. His offense was non violent. Citizens of the US should be concerned about this and the expansion of the authority and reach of the capitol police. There is an expansion of reach in play similar to that which followed 911, but on a far flimsier base and specifically aimed at domestic opposition.
I presume about half the population are complacent because they think that since they aren't in any way "deplorable" they will be fine - but that's the same short sightedness that Bush Republicans had when they thought the expanding police state would never come for them.
 
His offense was non violent.
yes, I agree that those persons who entered the Capitol (still illegally) but didn't break the windows, doors or attack the police were nonviolent.

I've NEVER supported prison. It's a stupid method for dealing with problem people and problems in society in general.

That's one reason I suggest the Jake fellow needs therapy.
All the terrorists need some sort of therapy
The US has a really horrible prison system
 
This is especially concerning if he is in solitary already and has not even been convicted. His offense was non violent. Citizens of the US should be concerned about this...
After 20 years of locking sometimes completely innocent people up without charge in Gitmo for multiple years at a time and torturing them, unsubstantiated claims of harsh treatment like this must come as quite the devastating shock to citizens of the US.
As an aside, although the Q Shaman appears not to have been directly involved in violence, he was part of a mob and some of that mob allegedly were violent, so I'm not sure of the merits of labouring the "non-violent crime" point.

-EDIT-
Since we're talking about unsubstantiated things that might reasonably be expected to concern US citizens, don't expect too many folk to give the square root of a {bleep} about this either:
 
Last edited:
After 20 years of locking sometimes completely innocent people up without charge in Gitmo for multiple years at a time and torturing them, unsubstantiated claims of harsh treatment like this must come as quite the devastating shock to citizens of the US.
As an aside, although the Q Shaman appears not to have been directly involved in violence, he was part of a mob and some of that mob allegedly were violent, so I'm not sure of the merits of labouring the "non-violent crime" point.

-EDIT-
Since we're talking about unsubstantiated things that might reasonably be expected to concern US citizens, don't expect too many folk to give the square root of a {bleep} about this either:
Assange still in prison without trial (and he's spent lots of time in solitary too) - it's extrajudicial punishment to make examples. People rioted all last summer and got slaps on the wrist. Even if the capitol riot was 10 x worse that should result in 10 slaps on the wrist. These persecutions are so transparently political. One set of rioters were good for the party, one set were a threat to the party (not in that moment, but if the mood behind it was allowed to continue the ruling party would have trouble maintaining authority. As with Gitmo, by labeling people "terrorists", all normal jurisprudence and due process gets tossed out the door.
 
Which party are we talking about?
Upper case 'P' party. The actual ruling party. The ones that can withhold prosecution or bring it down regardless of law. The mostly technocratic normally pragmatic players who usually focus on foreign threats but who are currently ideologically infected and suffering an autoimmune reaction. Some gangs are allowed to intimidate and damage with impunity like the brown shirts were, others get show trials. Perfectly sound and normal things to say are flagged and hushed. Things are getting weird and the worst abuses of reason come wrapped in rainbows wearing a smiley face mask. A theocratic ecstasy flows through millennials who have been fed a lo-cal substitute for doing good. I have no idea if there is a Jim Jones holding the tiller or if it's just a headless mania but I worry it ends the same either way.
Can the falcon still hear the falconer? Would it heed now if it did?
There is usually a pretty thick veil over the machinations of state but the veneer seems transparently thin these days as if someone feels so confident of their advantage they've put aside stealth in favour of exercising some muscle.
 
Upper case 'P' party. The actual ruling party.
So when you said, "One set of rioters were good for the party, one set were a threat to the party," you did not mean a political ruling party like the Democrats of Republicans, but an overarching ruling party, regardless of who is nominally in charge?
Sounds remarkably like previous descriptions of the "cabal" or "deep state".
 
So when you said, "One set of rioters were good for the party, one set were a threat to the party," you did not mean a political ruling party like the Democrats of Republicans, but an overarching ruling party, regardless of who is nominally in charge?
Sounds remarkably like previous descriptions of the "cabal" or "deep state".
The major political parties have long had more common interest with each other than with the public. Trump was an outsider and therefore a threat to the party Party (the meta party, a sort of non-aware recognition of shared interests).
Businesses, militaries, institutions, churches and parties are all organs of state that both co-operate and are at odds with each other. Think murmurations. Individual birds plot their own course but the flock flows and changes shape with brief patterns that emerge, pass through then dissipate.
But also think of crystallization, over time individuals form groups, groups accrete into institutions. A flock of a million small birds eventually becomes a flock of a few hundred really big birds.
But then add a zombie virus that takes over the brain (the leadership) of those big birds. Christianity in Rome, Communism in Russia and China, Nazism in Germany. All religious in nature - a righteous chosen flock oppressed by an evil adversary justifying war by every means until, from the ashes, a miraculous everlasting utopia will arise (and, obviously, very little regard for facts and reality).
We've got one of those zombie mind viruses going around at the moment, and it's flying enough mega-birds these days that it has become the defacto ruling system (and that is the Party to which I refer) in the 5 eyes countries. It is now large enough (or, if we are lucky, merely almost large enough) to "Fair Game" (deliciously ironic Scientology parlance meaning punish and harrass by all means possible) those who don't go along, or at least don't pretend to go along.
 
This could just as well go in the election fraud thread:

Leaked voting machine BIOS passwords led investigators to Q-friendly county clerk.

Last week, Ron Watkins—conspiracy theorist, QAnon enthusiast, and former 8chan site admin—released photocopies of an installation manual for Dominion voting machines. The copied pages gave basic instructions for configuring BIOS passwords and iDRAC, a standard network remote control tool (which the manual explicitly requires the administrator to disable).

The next day, Watkins released a video purporting to be from a "whistleblower" exposing Dominion's "most egregious lie"—that Dominion can remotely administer the machines, he said. He also released several screenshots of Election Management Systems hardware his "whistleblower" had access to.

Although none of Watkins' screenshots—which will be immediately familiar to anyone who's ever administered enterprise-grade hardware—are as damning to the voting machines as Watkins would clearly like, they did end up causing problems for one of Watkins' fellow travelers: county clerk Tina Peters of Mesa County, Colorado, whose office manages the machines in question.
 
Back
Top