Has Q chucked it?

I still occasionally get caught out by the unhinged madness of this stuff:
384185943_211433625285901_4955356146734158734_n.jpg
 
Is QAnon still a thing? The world can be a strange place sometimes. The HBO Doc about it says it all.
 
Is QAnon still a thing? The world can be a strange place sometimes. The HBO Doc about it says it all.
The Q account hasn't posted anything for over a year but the anons are still as mental as ever. Matthew Perry's death is animating some of them:
F9u2IXFXIAApFgM

F9u2IXIXEAAEAI5
 
He was after Nancy. There are lots of sane reasons to want to get rid of her, but if you're going to try something like that it's best to have an insane reason handy.
He's at least partly blaming gamer-gate. Blamer-gate? :p
--
DePape's defense team argues these online influences were responsible for his bizarre plan to invade the Pelosi home and confront Nancy Pelosi on Russia's alleged involvement in the 2016 election, all while wearing an inflatable unicorn costume and livestreaming the conversation. DePape said he only attacked Pelosi's husband when it was clear that plan was falling apart, an argument which could mitigate against the legally important charge that the attack was retaliation "against the official for performance of their duties."
 
Isn’t Bill Gates to blame for all of this? That’s what the word on the street says.
 
Here is a liberated version.

"The pedophilic accounts on Instagram mix brazenness with superficial efforts to veil their activity, researchers found. Certain emojis function as a kind of code, such as an image of a map—shorthand for “minor-attracted person”—or one of “cheese pizza,” which shares its initials with “child pornography,” according to Levine of UMass."

Just reminded me of "conspiracy theories".
and it's not like they can't muster the effort to close down networks - like Jan Sixers, but pedos? Who cares?
 
but pedos? Who cares?
Well, indeed. Those who shout loudest about pedophilia rarely care about pedophilia. Rather it's a stick to beat whomever they disagree with. They rail against pedophilia by making unfounded accusations against those they don't like. When someone is actually investigated for pedophilia, if that someone is "on their side" it's either ignored or excused. You need look no further afield than this thread for more than one example of such.
 
I was going to post this bizarre clip of Scott Ritter in the war thread but he's a good example of this. So many "save the children from leftie paedos" types love him as he "tells it like it is".

Certainly not many of the Qanon mob seem to care so long as the "pedo" is onside.
It makes sense that he'd be bit of a pedo for the UN to take him on as a weapons inspector. That way they can tell him what to find. He's served his time and he was still right about Iraq.
 
There's been a bunch of these crackpots that have fallen for some AI images of the Pope and called him a "pedo" because of it. Not to worry though; he's been hanged for it already. And right in front of the white House. :confused:
GDgjw5AaUAAf44C
 
Qanon's weird obsession with movies has been a constant thread for the whole 6 years (and counting). So much of the lore and messaging comes from fictional movies, right up to the "WWG1WGA" slogan that Trump responded to the other night.

GEyajtvWoAAqvZc
 
Back
Top