- Joined
- Apr 1, 2005
- Messages
- 10,874
- Reaction score
- 6,581
The Q account hasn't posted anything for over a year but the anons are still as mental as ever. Matthew Perry's death is animating some of them:Is QAnon still a thing? The world can be a strange place sometimes. The HBO Doc about it says it all.
He's at least partly blaming gamer-gate. Blamer-gate?He was after Nancy. There are lots of sane reasons to want to get rid of her, but if you're going to try something like that it's best to have an insane reason handy.
DePape's defense team argues these online influences were responsible for his bizarre plan to invade the Pelosi home and confront Nancy Pelosi on Russia's alleged involvement in the 2016 election, all while wearing an inflatable unicorn costume and livestreaming the conversation. DePape said he only attacked Pelosi's husband when it was clear that plan was falling apart, an argument which could mitigate against the legally important charge that the attack was retaliation "against the official for performance of their duties."
Whereas the vehicle doing the finger-pointing there, The Grayzone, is above such propaganda?But Bellin¿cat, though ... https://thegrayzone.com/2021/10/09/bellingcat-intelligence-contractors-extremists-syria/
I don't have a subscription. Any chance of a synopsis or quotes of the relevant points?Wall St Journal (paywalled)
WSJ News Exclusive | Instagram Connects Vast Pedophile Network
The Meta unit’s systems for fostering communities have guided users to child-sex content; company says it is improving internal controls.www.wsj.com
Well, indeed. Those who shout loudest about pedophilia rarely care about pedophilia. Rather it's a stick to beat whomever they disagree with. They rail against pedophilia by making unfounded accusations against those they don't like. When someone is actually investigated for pedophilia, if that someone is "on their side" it's either ignored or excused. You need look no further afield than this thread for more than one example of such.but pedos? Who cares?
Certainly not many of the Qanon mob seem to care so long as the "pedo" is onside.pedos? Who cares?
It makes sense that he'd be bit of a pedo for the UN to take him on as a weapons inspector. That way they can tell him what to find. He's served his time and he was still right about Iraq.I was going to post this bizarre clip of Scott Ritter in the war thread but he's a good example of this. So many "save the children from leftie paedos" types love him as he "tells it like it is".
Certainly not many of the Qanon mob seem to care so long as the "pedo" is onside.