Has Q chucked it?

Russell now blatantly grifting the electrosensitive subset of anons. I know one ("no 'phones in the house!") who will lap this up.
The fact he is wearing a device to protect you from "evil wireless signals" whilst speaking into a wireless mic only adds to the fun.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1846024507758162396
It's a shame there wasn't an amulet to protect vulnerable young women from Russell Brand.
 
Could be in the political jokes thread as obviously tongue in cheek.
GargpWwXcAA-uGS
 
Robert said:
Russell now blatantly grifting the electrosensitive subset of anons. I know one ("no 'phones in the house!") who will lap this up.
The fact he is wearing a device to protect you from "evil wireless signals" whilst speaking into a wireless mic only adds to the fun.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1846024507758162396
It's a shame there wasn't an amulet to protect vulnerable young women from Russell Brand.
Click to expand...

I didn't bother replying to this since I don't disagree it's garbage, but figured I'd point out it makes him no different than the so called "mainstream" outlets. When I used to even bother watching them, they'd run advertisements and late night infomercials for similar garbage. For about a decade there was some magical bracelet that would cure everything being pushed. They even had fairly big name celebrities in the commercials / infomercials. I'd be willing to bet if I tuned in late night to these garbage stations, I'd still see similar.
 
redrumloa said:
I didn't bother replying to this since I don't disagree it's garbage, but figured I'd point out it makes him no different than the so called "mainstream" outlets. When I used to even bother watching them, they'd run advertisements and late night infomercials for similar garbage. For about a decade there was some magical bracelet that would cure everything being pushed.
Click to expand...
All true except part of Brand's old image was poking fun at woo-woo. These days he's peddling it.
 
Robert said:
All true except part of Brand's old image was poking fun at woo-woo. These days he's peddling it.
Click to expand...

The MSM channels never put their face with the product. If it was a commercial, it was a commercial separate from whatever show. Infomercials I guess they just hid behind the disclaimer at the beginning, something like "The following program is paid advertising for XYZ. Onions expressed do not necessarily reflect *** Station.". I don't know how individual YT personalities can accept ad dollars while still keep said product at arm's length.
 
Not specifically Q related but I've seen the same poster promote Q stuff before and this gave me a chuckle. In case anyone doesn't know, the poster he's correcting for misinterpreting the book is the author of said book.
Gbd5FLWakAAIzAa
 
As much as Q-Anon is bullsh*t, it's been made a pysyop IMO, one of their key positions is 100% true. Pizzagate was never about a single creepy pizza shop. Yes there is a global sex trafficking and pedophilia ring of celebrities and left leaning politicians. Epstein didn't kill himself. You never saw the Epstein list. Every single Diddy inner circle person is endorsing Kamala, despite most of them previously saying they wouldn't endorse anyone. Weird how that flipped with them all after a certain civil lawyer stated he had all the tapes. The panic is real. The Diddy tapes aren't public, but what these degenerates allowed out there before all of this should tell you all you need to know.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1037058324836235

Yes, the biggest part of needing to stop orangemanbad at all cost, including assassination, is this. He really will expose them this time. That includes Obummer and Michael. Do you remember $15k for "hotdogs" at the White House in Wikileaks? Probably not.
 
Last edited:
Robert said:
Now we're back onto "the moon landings were fake".
GfV5ecRWYAAEpk_
Click to expand...

I've entertained their arguments and it's still nonsense. The best I'll give them is NASA is notorious for doctoring photos, which provides fuel for the wackos. I think there's an obvious situation that NASA is refusing to disclose certain things, but actually going? Yeah, we've gone.
 
redrumloa said:
I've entertained their arguments and it's still nonsense. The best I'll give them is NASA is notorious for doctoring photos, which provides fuel for the wackos. I think there's an obvious situation that NASA is refusing to disclose certain things, but actually going? Yeah, we've gone.
Click to expand...
It's an issue with social media generally but one thing Q-anon in particular has demonstrated is how easy it is to recycle nonsense over and over and over again. No matter how comprehensively that nonsense is debunked, there are always millions more gullible rubes queuing up, begging to be lied to and take the place of the previous cadre of simpletons. I genuinely fear for the future of society.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top