Has Q chucked it?

Q Crackpot gets 9 years. "I'm not a criminal and I don't deserve to go into a prison where other people have committed heinous crimes." :confused: Judge, unsurprisingly, disagreed. The irony of her committing election fraud in her mentally-deranged attempt to prove election fraud is quite something.

9 years for voting-system breach

Peters was convicted of three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty, and failing to comply with the secretary of state," the Associated Press wrote at the time.

After the conviction, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said that "Tina Peters willfully compromised her own election equipment trying to prove Trump's big lie. She has been found guilty by a jury of her peers and will now face the consequences of her actions."

In October 2021, Peters was barred from supervising elections due to the leak of voting-system BIOS passwords to QAnon conspiracy theorist Ron Watkins. At the time, Mesa County District Court Judge Valerie Robison detailed how Peters brought a man into a meeting on a "trusted build" software update that is meant to ensure a secure chain of custody for the voting system.

During that meeting, video and photos were taken of a laptop that displayed passwords, which were later posted to an online social media site. Mesa County data was also leaked to Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO who spread false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.

"Some of the facts in the case have never been disputed, Peters admits that in May 2021, she used the identity of a Fruita man named Gerald Wood to give a different man—Conan Hayes, a self-described data expert from California—access to county voting equipment, both to copy its hard drive and a few days later to attend a secure update of the machine's software. Hayes is a retired surfer with ties to Lindell and his campaign of spreading falsehoods about the country's election system."

-edit-
Video of sentencing is quite interesting for a foreigner like me:
 
Last edited:
The bold Marg now has the deep state cabal starting a hurricane over Republican areas to steal the election. At least she didn't blame "The Rothschild Family" this time (yet).
GZDUJWKW0AAtlKX

GZDUJVlWEAAJFgS
 
The bold Marg now has the deep state cabal starting a hurricane over Republican areas to steal the election. At least she didn't blame "The Rothschild Family" this time (yet).
GZDUJWKW0AAtlKX

GZDUJVlWEAAJFgS

"Never let a good crisis go to waste" - Hillary Clinton

See my post on genocide in the US for proof on this. As for controlling the weather, the US has certainly tried repeatedly for almost 100 years. They had some success with HARP, but at least officially shut it down. I believe in proof so I won't make such a declaration, but do think anyone who does not give at least a side eye to the Maui fires or the behavior of Hurricane Helene isn't a critical thinker. I have no first hand experience with wildfires, but I am somewhat of an expert on Hurricanes at this point having dealt directly with 11 major hits in my lifetime both personally and professionally.

Andrew
Charley
Francis
Ivan
Jeanne
Dennis
Katrina
Rita
Wilma
Irma
Helene


I won't say much more at this time except no other storm in recorded history ever failed to loose strength quickly once hitting land. I'd worry about those not at least being curious. However the storm itself happened, the end results are Dems are using it as their October Surprise leaving a deep, deep trail of dead voters in their path.
 
The bold Marg now has the deep state cabal starting a hurricane over Republican areas to steal the election. At least she didn't blame "The Rothschild Family" this time (yet).
GZDUJWKW0AAtlKX

GZDUJVlWEAAJFgS
I doubt they can control the weather, but they can slow roll the assistance to areas that would vote the wrong way so that people can't get to polls and mail-in ballots can go missing. It's more a crime of opportunity and, besides, on a more human level, why would you help people who hate you or that you hate - unless you had some kind of honour, of course.
 
Even though it's not Q it seems very apropos - sort of Blue-Anon election interferency and yet hilarious. The story seems to check out with a bit of googling but this presentation is more entertaining.
 

It seems you are completely unaware that the US has a long history of attempting weather modification and actually used it in the Vietnam War. That's not a conspiracy theory, it is recognized historical record. Just because you may stick your fingers in your ears and close your eyes doesn't mean history didn't happen.

There are also patents and regulation regarding weather modification. The only thing unproven to me is just how effective any such technology would be on a large storm and whether that technology has been used against citizens. I'd like to shrug it off and say definitively it was impossible or "they" would never do that, but the evidence to the contrary gives me pause.

I know you won't click this link, but Fluffy may. It's only ~10 minutes long but it does touch on the historical record stuff you can verify.

 
It seems you are completely unaware that the US has a long history of attempting weather modification
It seems you are too, since you liked a post that said:
I doubt they can control the weather
;)
More seriously, I'm well aware of weather modification efforts but it's quite the jump from that to starting a hurricane to kill GOP voters.
:confused:
 
More seriously, I'm well aware of weather modification efforts but it's quite the jump from that to starting a hurricane to kill GOP voters.

Killing GOP is certainly the plan, but may not be the only plan. There's permits for the largest lithium mine in the US to break ground in 2025 in the exact area hardest hit. Just a coincidence, amIright.

We can give the benefit of doubt that the hurricane was 100% natural and FEMA is still trying to kill off these people. I cite example after example in the Genocide thread, but that whole sticking fingers in ears and closing eyes thing is going on...
 
I'm just seeing this now and it certainly is worth a watch.

"Qanon Shaman" ties NLP, Mass Formation Psychosis and Critical Factor Bypass to Mockingbird Media​

 
Last edited:
It seems you are too, since you liked a post that said:

;)
More seriously, I'm well aware of weather modification efforts but it's quite the jump from that to starting a hurricane to kill GOP voters.
:confused:

Rereading this it seems you have a quick take binary view of facts. I live in the grey area trying to figure out what is actual hard reality. If you have an open mind eventually you can see what is real. Most people just want rapid easy answers so they can move on to the next rapid easy answer.

What's your opinion of Hildabeast now compared to when I uploaded my current avatar?
 
Last edited:
It's not just mad Marj who thinks* the storms are deliberate. Thread full of Q nonsense; chem-trails, weather weapons, etc:

*I say "thinks". I know at least a couple of these cranks are preying on the gullible for money and don't believe a word of the pish they post.
 
It's not just mad Marj who thinks* the storms are deliberate. Thread full of Q nonsense; chem-trails, weather weapons, etc:

It's not just Q folks. It's becoming a default position for many every day people, intelligent people. I have my suspicions but haven't climbed onboard, often makin me the odd man out in conversations.
 
It's not just Q folks. It's becoming a default position for many every day people, intelligent people.
And that's one of the reasons Q-anon is so fascinating. Most of the Q followers I know were exactly that, "every day, intelligent people," before they started down the "I'll believe anything I'm fed, no matter how mental," rabbit hole. Now at least one of them (a primary-school teacher) claims the earth is flat. Another is adamant Covid is a hoax, even though she knows some of the same people I do who died from it. Both think the moon landings were fake and both, surprise surprise, have been sharing this "weather weapon" nonsense on Facebook. I know about half a dozen others in various levels of red-pilled derangement. These are mostly middle-aged Scottish people with no previous connection to US politics or anti-Semitism but now they all hate Jews and love Trump. Until around 5 years ago, not a single one of them posted any of this crap. It's a sad indictment of contemporary society that people are so easily manipulated by grifters peddling lies.

-edit-
Here's one from the school teacher last night. I also noticed a new one on her page; Alzheimer's was deliberately created by doctors 40 years ago to reduce population:
”If you go on a low Cholesterol diet or cholesterol medication, it’s the fastest way to Alzheimer’s disease”
462368596_3731799297074321_4912425062180115362_n.jpg

There's plenty more where that came from.
 
Last edited:
I have some nuanced opinions on some of those subjects, but mostly agree with your sentiment.
Alzheimer's was deliberately created by doctors 40 years ago to reduce population:

This one is relatively new to me, but there is some substance to it. I'm not talking about made by doctors 40 years ago to reduce population, but rather this part.

”If you go on a low Cholesterol diet or cholesterol medication, it’s the fastest way to Alzheimer’s disease”

That's actually not a conspiracy theory in any way. It is firmly now part of the mainstream conversation in the medical field. It's not universally accepted, but a portion of the medical field have pretty compelling evidence. Alzheimer's Disease is considered Type 3 Diabetes.

Type 3 diabetes (Wikipedia)


Type 3 diabetes is a proposed pathological linkage between Alzheimer's disease and certain features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Specifically, the term refers to a set of common biochemical and metabolic features seen in the brain in Alzheimer's disease, and in other tissues in diabetes; it may thus be considered a "brain-specific type of diabetes." It was recognized at least as early as 2005 that some features of brain function in Alzheimer's disease mimic those that underlie diabetes. However, the concept of type 3 diabetes is controversial, and as of 2021 it was not a widely or generally recognized diagnosis.

I'd say at this point the Wikipedia article is fair to call it controversial. Dr. Atkins low carb lifestyle was for a very long time considered controversial, even when I first properly learned of it in 2002 by reading his (original) book. In current year the general concept of low carb is probably the most accepted. There's good evidence as to why it took so long, but I won't get into that here.

My general point is this Type 3 Diabetes thing is compelling and may one day become accepted fact. It doesn't automatically mean doctors got together 40 years ago in some smoky room and decided to kill people off with low cholesterol diet and drugs. It could simply be the science was WAY WAY wrong and the field has been stubborn to admit they were wrong. When I was a kid natural butter was demonized and margarine was pushed as the "healthy" alternative. We obviously know that's bullsh*t now, but it took decades for the mainstream to admit. Do you remember olestra chips? It seems the mainstream gets it wrong more that they get it right. Incompetence, greed or a desire for genocide? That's the question.


 
Last edited:
It's not universally accepted, but a portion of the medical field have pretty compelling evidence. Alzheimer's Disease is considered Type 3 Diabetes.

Type 3 diabetes (Wikipedia)


Type 3 diabetes is a proposed pathological linkage between Alzheimer's disease and certain features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Specifically, the term refers to a set of common biochemical and metabolic features seen in the brain in Alzheimer's disease, and in other tissues in diabetes; it may thus be considered a "brain-specific type of diabetes." It was recognized at least as early as 2005 that some features of brain function in Alzheimer's disease mimic those that underlie diabetes. However, the concept of type 3 diabetes is controversial, and as of 2021 it was not a widely or generally recognized diagnosis.

I'd say at this point the Wikipedia article is fair to call it controversial. Dr. Atkins low carb lifestyle was for a very long time considered controversial, even when I first properly learned of it in 2002 by reading his (original) book. In current year the general concept of low carb is probably the most accepted. There's good evidence as to why it took so long, but I won't get into that here.

My general point is this Type 3 Diabetes thing is compelling and may one day become accepted fact. It doesn't automatically mean doctors got together 40 years ago in some smoky room and decided to kill people off with low cholesterol diet and drugs.
Indeed, it's an interesting and important field of research. I'm aware of one recent study that indicates high cholesterol in over 85s may lead to better memory. You can read about it here.
(https://www.alzheimersresearchuk.org/news/better-memory-thinking-seen-85s-despite-high-cholesterol/)

I'm also aware of another recent study which indicates high cholesterol increases risk of Alzheimer's. This, AFAICT, is in accordance with the preponderance of evidence to date. You can read about that one here.
(https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/h...orting-molecule-may-increase-alzheimers-risk/)

There is, however, also research suggesting cholesterol does not directly increase the risk for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease.
(https://www.kcl.ac.uk/archive/news/...-link-between-high-cholesterol-and-alzheimers)

What I'm not aware of is any study showing low cholesterol increases risk of Alzheimer's. If you know of such research, I'd be interested to read it. Alzheimer's is something that has devastated my extended family and I'm always keen to learn more about it.

Back to the Q cranks - the issue I have with this statement:
"If you go on a low Cholesterol diet or cholesterol medication, it’s the fastest way to Alzheimer’s disease”
is that it's dangerous. Even if there is a study indicating higher cholesterol reduces the risk, that doesn't mean high cholesterol is good for you. It's practically guaranteed that because of this Q-anonsense, some idiots will be ignoring good medical advice to reduce their cholesterol level. Even the link I posted showing better memory in over 85s with high cholesterol has this statement from Dr. David Reynolds, Chief Scientific Officer of Alzheimer’s Research UK:
“The overwhelming weight of evidence indicates that high cholesterol, especially in midlife, is linked to an increased risk of dementia. It is very difficult to identify a single risk factor for dementia in this selective group of very old people who do not already have the condition. The finding that high cholesterol in people over 85 may be linked to better cognitive function, probably reflects the genetic makeup of people who survive to this advanced age rather than the amount of cholesterol in their blood.

“There is no suggestion or evidence from this research that people should increase their cholesterol levels to maintain a healthy brain and we know high cholesterol is a risk factor for many other health conditions. Currently the best evidence to maintain good brain health is to eat a balanced diet, maintain a healthy weight, not smoke, exercise regularly and keep blood pressure and cholesterol in check.

As usual with conspiracy theories, there appears to be a tenuous grain of truth blown out of all proportion.
 
Last edited:
As usual with conspiracy theories, there appears to be a tenuous grain of truth blown out of all proportion.

And there's the rub I've always had with anything Q related. Once I really started paying attention to it I saw Q Anon as a psyop. Create this cult of weak minded people and feed them complete nonsense, including about subjects you simply simply don't want discussed in the mainstream. It could be something pretty rock solid obvious with a paper trail of evidence, but if the person you hear it from was just saying the Earth is flat, no one will take it serious.
 
Back
Top